phanatic Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Here's a few, Pearls of Wisdom from Bubba. Now while you might not find fault with his assertion on McNabb not being able to win the big game, I ask you, how many Qb's actually have? what a shot in the dark, eh? Good reading, bubba. McNabb can't throw the long ball? 2nd most in the league last year? I respect your position as the ExrtremeSkins most posting, poster (hehehe), but I must call you to task on some of your more, um, presumptious ramblings. I don't homer post, here. I just like to give a realistic opinion, minus the green and silver glasses. Foooolllsballl talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Wow, this is a useless thread. TO swipes at McNabb, some skins fans giggle about it, WB and some others cant deal with a little ribbing, and have a hissy fit over a point of opinion that neither of you will prove. Why bother? WB, you live in freaking Hawaii. Go outside or something. I would suggest you go to Philly and look at your team's Lombardi trophies in order to relax, but that's something only Bubba can do. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Originally posted by Westbrook36 Last year, not many, since the Eagles were so dominant. I can only think of the Cleveland game where we won in overtime. In his career? You don't want to go down that road.... You dodged it. Nice. Two come to my mind right away... that performance ( :laugh: ) against Pitts and the "gut check" ( :laugh: ) in the SB. Now back to your regularly scheduled homerism.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 In all honesty I would be more worried if the Skins had to face the Eagles with Blake & TO, than McNabb & TO in the line up. How can we ever take the opinion of this man seriously again? And he has the nerve to rip NFL writers!?!? Jesus, that is the worst thing I ever seen in my life. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 12, 2005 Author Share Posted April 12, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic Here's a few, Pearls of Wisdom from Bubba. Now while you might not find fault with his assertion on McNabb not being able to win the big game, I ask you, how many Qb's actually have? what a shot in the dark, eh? Good reading, bubba. McNabb can't throw the long ball? 2nd most in the league last year? I respect your position as the ExrtremeSkins most posting, poster (hehehe), but I must call you to task on some of your more, um, presumptious ramblings. I don't homer post, here. I just like to give a realistic opinion, minus the green and silver glasses. Foooolllsballl talk. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: again the avoidance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 12, 2005 Author Share Posted April 12, 2005 Originally posted by Westbrook36 How can we ever take the opinion of this man seriously again? And he has the nerve to rip NFL writers!?!? Mcnabb realy lit it up against the Skins :laugh: Originally posted by Westbrook36 Jesus, that is the worst thing I ever seen in my life. :doh: don't read your own stuff, huh? :snore: wake me when you want to discuss the topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Originally posted by zoony You dodged it. Nice. Two come to my mind right away... that performance ( :laugh: ) against Pitts and the "gut check" ( :laugh: ) in the SB. Now back to your regularly scheduled homerism.... Our only two real losses of the year. Congrats. You just so eloquently stated how McNabb doesn't have the ability to go undefeated. Damn. I knew we should have moved up for Ramsey. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorPickSix Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 hahahahahahahahahah awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 Mcnabb realy lit it up against the Skins :laugh: don't read your own stuff, huh? :snore: wake me when you want to discuss the topic What topic? Where you said McNabb can't handle pressure and he didn't face any until the last drive of the SB? :doh: So typical of a Bubba misinformed biased opinion. Yes, you are right, an NFL QB faced no pressure until the last drive of the SB....Do you honestly believe this crap that you spew? Because if you do, I guess no active players on the Skins save a handful have never faced pressure since they have never because they haven't played in playoff games. See how stupid that sounds? I guess McNabb face no pressure in the two playoff games he won, especially the NFCC Game which would have been his fourth loss in a row. I guess he faced no pressure during the regular season with everyone saying he had no more excuses now that he had Owens. Of course he didn't. You know why? Because to say he didn't fits your baseless ridiculous argument and we ALL know how you like to play hard and loose with facts to suit your premise of whatever you are spewing out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 13, 2005 Author Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by Westbrook36 So typical of a Bubba misinformed biased opinion. Yes, you are right, an NFL QB faced no pressure until the last drive of the SB.... Do you honestly believe this crap that you spew? Because if you do, I guess no active players on the Skins save a handful have never faced pressure since they have never because they haven't played in playoff games. See how stupid that sounds? I guess McNabb face no pressure in the two playoff games he won, especially the NFCC Game which would have been his fourth loss in a row. I guess he faced no pressure during the regular season with everyone saying he had no more excuses now that he had Owens. Of course he didn't. You know why? Because to say he didn't fits your baseless ridiculous argument and we ALL know how you like to play hard and loose with facts to suit your premise of whatever you are spewing out. dear lord you can be a nimrod the McNabb/eagles had the easiest path to the Super Bowl ever. the 30th toughest schedule, the media was concerned with TO, playoffs against a dysfunctional 8-8 vikings team, and a young Falcon team that if you stop Vick, you can beat them easiy... (ask KC) yeah he had so much pressure on him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Yeah, so little pressure that you picked against them in the NFCC Game for just that reason. :doh: Doesn't it suck when all your lies and miscalculations all run together? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 dear lord you can be a nimrod the McNabb/eagles had the easiest path to the Super Bowl ever. the 30th toughest schedule, the media was concerned with TO, playoffs against a dysfunctional 8-8 vikings team, and a young Falcon team that if you stop Vick, you can beat them easiy... (ask KC) yeah he had so much pressure on him Ah, the strength of schedule argument. Fantastic. Remember 91'? the Eagles were 9-6 going into the final game of the season, the Skins were 14-1. The Skins ATTEMPTED TO break and tie a record that Monday night. They succeeded in neither, and that against a carpenter at QB. They lost and were sacked five times in that game thus nullifying their attempt to break the least sacked record. You see, the Eagles would have gone on and won the Super Bowl that year but Bryce Paup ended Randall Cunninghams eason in week one. 10-6 with a carpenter at QB. The Skins were LUCKY that RC was gone the whole year. Strength of schedule you say? Dig a little deeper. Had the Eagles had to fight to beat the Rams and the Bengals to secure homefield, 15-1. Call Snyder and ask him to field something other than a half a$$ed attempt of a arena football team. Don't blame those who have taken the time and the YEARS to BUILD a contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 13, 2005 Author Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by Westbrook36 Yeah, so little pressurethat you picked against them in the NFCC Game for just that reason. :doh: Doesn't it suck when all your lies and miscalculations all run together? you're wrong once again :laugh: I picked the eagles to win both playoff games Doesn't it suck when all your lies and miscalculations all run together? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 13, 2005 Author Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic Ah, the strength of schedule argument. Fantastic. Remember 91'? the Eagles were 9-6 going into the final game of the season, the Skins were 14-1. The Skins ATTEMPTED TO break and tie a record that Monday night. They succeeded in neither, and that against a carpenter at QB. They lost and were sacked five times in that game thus nullifying their attempt to break the least sacked record. You see, the Eagles would have gone on and won the Super Bowl that year but Bryce Paup ended Randall Cunninghams eason in week one. 10-6 with a carpenter at QB. The Skins were LUCKY that RC was gone the whole year. Strength of schedule you say? Dig a little deeper. Had the Eagles had to fight to beat the Rams and the Bengals to secure homefield, 15-1. Call Snyder and ask him to field something other than a half a$$ed attempt of a arena football team. Don't blame those who have taken the time and the YEARS to BUILD a contender. what exactly does this have to do with TO insulting McNabb? :whoknows: yeah the Eagles would have won the Superbowl in '91... Cuningham won so many in his career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Get ready...TO is gonna call McNabb gay... http://www.outsports.com/nfl/2004/0812garciaowens.htm TO is a great teammate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 what exactly does this have to do with TO insulting McNabb? :whoknows: yeah the Eagles would have won the Superbowl in '91... Cuningham won so many in his career. You're trying to equate the Eagles success, last season to a strength of schedule WALTZING them in. I'm giving you an example of misfortune that created opportunity for your beloved Skins. It cut's both ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 you're wrong once again :laugh: I picked the eagles to win both playoff games Doesn't it suck when all your lies and miscalculations all run together? Well, I'm going to do a search. I can almost swear I remember you talking about the pressure of the fourth straight NFCC Game will be too much. I'll check though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic Ah, the strength of schedule argument. Fantastic. Remember 91'? the Eagles were 9-6 going into the final game of the season, the Skins were 14-1. The Skins ATTEMPTED TO break and tie a record that Monday night. They succeeded in neither, and that against a carpenter at QB. They lost and were sacked five times in that game thus nullifying their attempt to break the least sacked record. You see, the Eagles would have gone on and won the Super Bowl that year but Bryce Paup ended Randall Cunninghams eason in week one. 10-6 with a carpenter at QB. The Skins were LUCKY that RC was gone the whole year. Strength of schedule you say? Dig a little deeper. Had the Eagles had to fight to beat the Rams and the Bengals to secure homefield, 15-1. Call Snyder and ask him to field something other than a half a$$ed attempt of a arena football team. Don't blame those who have taken the time and the YEARS to BUILD a contender. Yeah dude, that wasn't random and misleading at all. The Redskins certainly didnt take out the starting QB and most of the starting offensive line among others while leading 19-7 in the 3rd quarter. I mean CLEARLY that's indicative of a team going for a record. You just cant get over your lack of Lombardis, can you? Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 13, 2005 Author Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic You're trying to equate the Eagles success, last season to a strength of schedule WALTZING them in. I'm giving you an example of misfortune that created opportunity for your beloved Skins. It cut's both ways. no, I was pointing out that McNabb didn't have mental pressure on him last season.... the fact he didn't have to play the last 2 games and still win the NFC east helps prove that but hey lets not let that stop you from trying to avoid the point by attacking me or the Skins. Seriously it makes defense of your point so much stronger. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Anyone trying to take away from the Skins SB is reaching as much as anyone trying to take away from the Eagles complete dominance of the NFC last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by Zen-like Todd Yeah dude, that wasn't random and misleading at all. The Redskins certainly didnt take out the starting QB and most of the starting offensive line among others while leading 19-7 in the 3rd quarter. I mean CLEARLY that's indicative of a team going for a record. You just cant get over your lack of Lombardis, can you? Jesus. Um, the sack record was lost by the START OF THE SECOND QUARTER! Besides, WHY would they have left the starters in for nearly a half when they were getting pummled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 no, I was pointing out that McNabb didn't have mental pressure on him last season.... the fact he didn't have to play the last 2 games and still win the NFC east helps prove that but hey lets not let that stop you from trying to avoid the point by attacking me or the Skins. Seriously it makes defense of your point so much stronger. :laugh: Everything negative (or true) you view as an attack. You truly wish to be Jim Jones. It's a discussion, not an attack. It's in the middle of the offseason and theres absolutely no news other than what the Eagles and Skins idiot players want and what they're saying. Attack? Do you go outside and drive the freeways? Now that's an attack! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Well...phanatic, possibly to win a record 15th game? Secondary of course to the sack record , but perhaps winning was a goal here? Check it out. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/sports/redskins/longterm/book/pages/181.htm They entered the final regular-season game, against the Eagles, with a 14-1 record and with home field advantage already wrapped up. After watching Rypien take a hard shot from a blitzing linebacker in the third quarter, Gibbs pulled many of his starters and allowed reserves to finish a game that ended with a 24-22 loss. Courtesy of the ExtremeSkins games data base Washington was ahead 19-7 and appeared to be cruising towards a win, but Philadelphia rallied for 17 fourth-quarter points behind quarterback Jeff Kemp and Roger Ruzek kicked the game-winning field goal with 13 seconds remaining. The only thing the Redskins could accomplish here was an NFL-record tying 15th win during the regular season. As the game on the hard artificial surface wore on, that goal became secondary to keeping the front-line players healthy for the playoffs and Joe Gibbs began to pull his starters, including Mark Rypien and Charles Mann. Jim Lachey summed up the general feeling: “We all hate to lose, but the object is to win in January.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic Um, the sack record was lost by the START OF THE SECOND QUARTER! Besides, WHY would they have left the starters in for nearly a half when they were getting pummled? WHAT? I CANT HEAR YOU UNLESS YOU TYPE IN CAPS, AND ALSO IT MAKES YOUR RIDICULOUS COMMENTS SEEM REASONABLE, NO REALLY. Gibbs had promised earlier in the week that he would play the starters all the way through, and then admitted to changing his mind on the bus on the way to the stadium. The Redskins were up 19-7, and if they really cared about going 15-1, they would have left them in. They didn't. Period. End of story. Your nonsensical ramblings about RC aside, there wasnt a single team in the league that was remotely close to the Redskins that year. Gibbs said all week he was leaning toward using his starters the entire way and playing to win from start to finish. He also told reporters he reserved the right to change his mind, and said that on the bus ride to the game, he did just that."I made my mind up when I got to the stadium that I was going to take him [Rypien] out at the first opportunity," Gibbs said. "If something had happened in the fourth quarter, I'd have felt bad. You go against this team, you know there's a chance of getting hit." Get it? Its called reality. God you sound like a loony right now. Obsessing over your inaccurate interpretation of another failed Eagles season from over a decade ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 13, 2005 Author Share Posted April 13, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic Everything negative (or true) you view as an attack. You truly wish to be Jim Jones. It's a discussion, not an attack. It's in the middle of the offseason and theres absolutely no news other than what the Eagles and Skins idiot players want and what they're saying. Attack? Do you go outside and drive the freeways? Now that's an attack! :laugh: eagle fans thy name be avoidance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.