feeshta Posted January 1, 2005 Share Posted January 1, 2005 Originally posted by SoCalSkins I went to UCLA. I hate the USC condoms. I guess that at least makes some semblence of sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feeshta Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 Originally posted by jtyler42 I think we may be the only ones on the board that see that if they are our stating WR's we will be in trouble...We will see Mike Williams shining for another team and the coulda-woulda-shoulda will start... You are not the only ones. For me I just think Williams is the best way to help the team as a whole in round 1. I think the O-line definately needs to be addressed, but does not require a round one pick to shore up. Also the DE position should be addressed, but it simply does not offer the potential to change the team that a great possesion WR does. So, I think we should go for Williams in round one. If he is not there though, we should consider trading down. There are no other players who are worth more than the extra picks, and there are several DE's who appear about equal, giving us the option to trade down and be reasonably assured at least one of them will be there. Whatever happens though, we need to improve this passing game to get anywhere next year. If we still have no passing game we will still not score many points, no matter how good the O-line is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtyler42 Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 Originally posted by feeshta You are not the only ones. For me I just think Williams is the best way to help the team as a whole in round 1. I think the O-line definately needs to be addressed, but does not require a round one pick to shore up. Also the DE position should be addressed, but it simply does not offer the potential to change the team that a great possesion WR does. So, I think we should go for Williams in round one. If he is not there though, we should consider trading down. There are no other players who are worth more than the extra picks, and there are several DE's who appear about equal, giving us the option to trade down and be reasonably assured at least one of them will be there. Whatever happens though, we need to improve this passing game to get anywhere next year. If we still have no passing game we will still not score many points, no matter how good the O-line is. Brilliant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs4Life Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 I hate to say it but i think we have to go with a wr in the draft. What we have right now is not cutting it. Mccants and jacobs dont prove themselves when the get in on plays and Gardner doesnt ever prove himself. He is terrible and only gets worse every season. But i dont think either jacobs or mccants are second wr material. Williams is an animal but after watching braylon edwards today i wouldnt mind getting him either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 Williams is the next Keyshawn Johnson. Talk amongst yourselves as to whether you want to use a top 10 draft pick for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 Originally posted by feeshta You are not the only ones. For me I just think Williams is the best way to help the team as a whole in round 1. I think the O-line definately needs to be addressed, but does not require a round one pick to shore up. Also the DE position should be addressed, but it simply does not offer the potential to change the team that a great possesion WR does. So, I think we should go for Williams in round one. If he is not there though, we should consider trading down. There are no other players who are worth more than the extra picks, and there are several DE's who appear about equal, giving us the option to trade down and be reasonably assured at least one of them will be there. Whatever happens though, we need to improve this passing game to get anywhere next year. If we still have no passing game we will still not score many points, no matter how good the O-line is. I see everyone's point, but I hear a lot of contradicting info on Williams. I admit I wouldn't mind seeing Plaxico here next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Montana Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 Williams should be the pick, or trade down for D-Line. Regardless of what everyone here wants, I find it very hard to believe that we pass on Williams if he is there at our pick. Gibbs went D last year, this year he will go O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 OK, Imma do my JBOOMA impersonation- "What makes you so sure well even have a draft pick?":) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck812 Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 The problem with taking Kiwi with the first pick is that he is not as highly rated prospect as Williams. I wouldn't have a problem picking a DE but there is just not one worthy of a high first round pick right now. Workouts and the combine may change that but right now Williams is the way to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.