phanatic Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 Originally posted by red zone The problem with the Eagles is they are missing someTHING as opposed to someBODY. Three straight NFC championship games? Two at home? You gotta win those. They choked like Monica Lewinsky for cryin' out loud. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Monica swallowed, (although she left some on her dress). EDIT: Keep in mind that the Eagles are 20 million under the cap next season as well as having ten million more to spend for this season. That number will swell as the new TV contracts hit in 2005. I guess you'll have to put up with their "choking" for three more years. Not to mention there seems to be a vaccuum sucking NFL free agents INTO Philly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins11 Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 Wow, I can't believe I read this much of this thread. I guess that's what "being at work" will do to you. Originally posted by phanatic Brilliant! And if both of the Tambay Bay corners didn't cheat the right side (getting out of position)on the CP run, then he has an average day, AT BEST. Isn't this fun? Just to clear something up, Bubba's point about the TO TD was that it should have never counted, since it shouldn't have been ruled a completion. It was a sort of controversial play. There was no such issue in the Clinton Portis 64 TD run... it was clean all the way. By the way, that picture someone posted about TO getting hit before the ball came is VERY blurry. That's not very good evidence to prove your point. Maybe it was made blurry on purpose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZkinsFan Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 F the eagles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 Originally posted by ramseyskins Wow, I can't believe I read this much of this thread. I guess that's what "being at work" will do to you. Just to clear something up, Bubba's point about the TO TD was that it should have never counted, since it shouldn't have been ruled a completion. It was a sort of controversial play. There was no such issue in the Clinton Portis 64 TD run... it was clean all the way. By the way, that picture someone posted about TO getting hit before the ball came is VERY blurry. That's not very good evidence to prove your point. Maybe it was made blurry on purpose OK genius. Maybe you shouldn't comment on something you didn't witness. Here ya goooooooooooooo Einstein! Link for Einstein. EDIT: The Jackass DB didn't even BOTHER to turn around to look for the ball. Burgandy and gold glasses all the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkPSkins Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 regardless of the Pass interference, which I agree was there. If the Vikings had challenged as they should have, there is no way they would have awarded the TD, and they can't call pass interference off of the replay. But's it all a moo point anyway, like a cows opinion, moo, doesn't matter. Funny, how the almost TD/fumble by Culpepper wasn't reviewed either in the last two minutes of the half which should have come down from the booth. The was real close (stephen davis carolina panthers last year close) to being a TD by the Vikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f_dallas Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 regardless of the Pass interference, which I agree was there. If the Vikings had challenged as they should have, there is no way they would have awarded the TD, and they can't call pass interference off of the replay. That's correct- a review would have reversed the TD (likely) and you can't review interfrence. But's it all a moo point anyway, like a cows opinion, moo, doesn't matter Precisely :laugh: I loved that line... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mummer43 Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 Originally posted by MarkPSkins But's it all a moo point anyway, like a cows opinion, moo, doesn't matter. Watch "Friends" much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobo_80 Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 Get ready to see alot of Blue!!! If the Skins cant beat the Ole G-Men, you people are living in a fantasy world if you think they will be able to hang with the Boys. They just got beat by the worst team in the NFC East...sorry second worst team. I wouldnt worry about Philly, just worry about winning ONE division game. Maybe next year guys.:wewantd: :wewantd: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TenaciousB15 Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 Originally posted by TenaciousB15 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/7704712 Originally posted by phanatic Nonsense, simple nonsense. Yards matter, not points! Your f'n kidding me right? This is a joke? Anyway, the Aikmen efficiency rankings explanation has been floating around the internet for a while now. He proposed it to the NFL to actually officially change it to his system. Its nice to see he atleast has it implemented it privately. It actually factors in more important factors, then yards alone, like the NFL currently does it. He does factor in yards, but they do not reflect more important facts, like points allowed. Its funny to see everyone immediatly dismiss this after looking who wrote it. Why? Hear no evil, see no evil? Just read it and see if you actually agree before judging a book by its cover. The Aikman Efficiency Ratings measure offensive and defensive performance using a combination of seven key statistics identified by Troy Aikman, and then measured against league norms (and extremes) established over the last 10 years. An offense or defense performing exactly at league norms in all categories will achieve a score of 75. It will take a truly exceptional unit to score more than 90 during an entire season on either the offensive or defensive scale. In 2003, AER scores ranged on offense from 93.95 (Kansas City) to 63.55 (New York Giants) and on defense from 86.87 (New England) to 62.60 (San Diego). The seven categories measured are: Adjusted Points (20 percent) -- Total Points Scored or Allowed minus Points on Returns and Safeties. Turnovers (20 percent). Red Zone Efficiency (20 percent) -- Measured by Percent of Possible Points (figured by taking the number of Red Zone Chances times 7, then dividing it by the number of Points Actually Scored (defined as TDs times 7 plus FGs times 3). Yards Per Play -- Divided into Yards Per Rush (10 percent of total) and Yards Per Pass Play (10 percent of total). Yards Per Pass Play includes yards on plays involving sacks. First Down Achievement -- Divided into Total First Downs (10 percent of total) and 3rd Down Conversion Percentage (10 percent of total). Also, look at week ones results: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/7683744 See it shows washington looking good on defense. I bet its the coolest thing ever now right? Also, here is another explanation: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/7610861 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potato Sack Posted September 23, 2004 Author Share Posted September 23, 2004 Originally posted by keith Not worried about the cowboys? Right and i bet you werent worried about the giants too? The way our offense is playing thus far, i would worry about every game we play this yr. I think we have more of a legitimate chance of beating the cowboys than we do of beating the Eagles. And, no, I wasn't really worried about the Giants. We killed ourselves with turnovers. And we were THIS close to a winning TD, but again mental errors cost us that one as well. Read my posts. If we limit turnovers and play smarter we can beat both the 'Girls and the Iggles. But we HAVE to play smart. period! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.