Tommy-the-Greek Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 I want to know what do most men think about where the line is between sexy and too much? Does it lie in the number of tattoo's the location or size? I believe 2 maybe 3 placed in the right spots can be very sexy. I also think that when a woman gets the 4th one it starts to lose that sexy appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icewater210 Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Only one is good for me. It has to be on the lower back just above the booty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NASMTrainer Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 I selected 1 or 2. My wife has 2 but I am the only one that can see them. She is wanting one on the lower back and I'll be ok with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skip to my lou Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 I'm opting for 0, but I do have a question for the guys with tattoos. What is the reasoning for a guy getting one that can't be seen, you know way up on shoulder as opposed to on arm. Isn't the reason you're getting one is to show it off, or as a memento or something. Just wonderin........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wwninja420 Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 My wife has four, and they only add to her sex appeal. I think it depends on placement and the actual context of the tattoo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrWill Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Originally posted by Skip to my lou I'm opting for 0, but I do have a question for the guys with tattoos. What is the reasoning for a guy getting one that can't be seen, you know way up on shoulder as opposed to on arm. Isn't the reason you're getting one is to show it off, or as a memento or something. Just wonderin........ Depending on what you do for a living.....tattoos may need to be hidden by a short sleeve shirt. 'Some' people would judge you by the fact that you have a tattoo. Previously, I thought that in the military it was customary to not have them below the elbows. Regardless, though....the decision on where to get them is a personal one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdsknbill Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 The Tatoo "MOM" on a woman's forearm just doesn't do it for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qb18_200400 Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 3 is fine with me but no more. My girl has one on her lower back, one on her pelvis and one on here shoulder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 You know, I'm struggling with this one. I mean, its really difficult to say without some 'examples' to look at? Help a brother out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codeorama Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Originally posted by icewater210 Only one is good for me. It has to be on the lower back just above the booty. I don't really care for women with tats, but the lower back is one that can be very sexy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Originally posted by codeorama I don't really care for women with tats Funny how your mind plays tricks on you when you're reading something a little too quickly You had me worried for a second there Code Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Well let me the contrarian here--I won't refuse to date a woman with tats, but come on....these things are so friggin tired. I mean, everyone and their mom(literally) is getting that lame lower-back tattoo. THEY CANT EVEN SEE IT! It's strictly for everyone else(mainly men, if they're heteros) At least when a guy gets a tattoo on his arm he can see the thing. Plus, does anyone think that it sends a certain signal? I mean, REALLY, you see a woman with a tat on her lower back, what do you think she's saying about herself and about her individuality(non-existent)? She's definitely giving off a sexual vibe with that kind of tat--esp because in order for it to be seen in public she has to be wearing certain clothing. ANd no one thinks how lame those things are going to look in 30 years(faded, wrinkled, dried out...nasty) Oh let's all get tats, we're different! No, you aren't. In fact, I am officially more of a rebel because I refuse piercings and tats than I was before. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okiefinfan23 Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 i think 1 or 2 are perfect. as icewater said one right above the butt (lower back). and i also saw a girl with a flower on her toe that wasn't bad looking. i guess as long as a girl doesn't have nasty toes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Hog Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 The wife has one, but another would not bother me at all. That's about it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blondie Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 I have one tatoo........on my ankle.....of a ladybug. I have had it for around 8 years. Long before the current craze of tatoos. I would like another one on my shoulder. Of a feather. I have my belly button pierced..........and currently am wearing a REDSKIN button stick. Sometimes I were a ladybug there. Blondie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman56 Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 I'm not a big fan of the lower back tattoo. Its almost cliche now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeSkin Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 I find tattoos on women highly unattractive, unless they're pornstars. I know it's wrong of me, but when I see a tattoo on a woman, I automatically think "redneck". It probably comes from having a dad that was a DJ at a country station growing up, and he was always having to go to these horrible concerts where what seemed like the scum of the Earth would crawl out. I went with him to a few, and that's where I saw the highest frequency of tattoed women. Honestly, the whole concept of tattoos has never really jived with me. Just seems rather pointless. If you want to make a statement then wear a t-shirt or something, don't brand yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinFaninOKC Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 2 tats is the limit. They must be perfectly placed on a womans body and not very big. 1 tatoo placed somewhere under the belly button but not too far down, if you know what I mean, and 1 tatoo placed on her back just above her butt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDoyler23 Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 The lower back tatoo is now the warning sign of the skank. I suggest to any female that has this tatoo to get a chinese letter, another trend, to go next to it saying "It sounded good @ the time" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselPwr44 Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 I have an "M" tatooed on each butt cheek. When I bend over it says MOM and when I lay on my back with my feet in the air it says WOW...... Also I have one of an arrow on my inner thigh that points up... it says "In case of an emergency, pull handle................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arioch Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Body graffitti....the ignorant and illiterates' art gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ancalagon the Black Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Originally posted by Arioch Body graffitti....the ignorant and illiterates' art gallery That's a bit harsh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WM_Marylander Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 To each his own. But doesn't really do it for me. I wouldn't object/complain, but I'd just wonder why? In a few years probably will be a regretted thing for most people. Small and sexy is better than like wearing warpaint. But, tattoos aren't me, or my preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halter91 Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 anything more than 3 is not sexy to me, but that's just me. Plus it definatley depends where they are located. On the chest is nice, until you reach about 40 and get all old looking, then they become nasty. My girl has one on her back, and a sun on her leg. So they are discreet. I have 2 and would like another, thinking about the redskins emblem, but what if they are forced to change there name.:point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Sick Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 My girlfriend has two, so I had to pick that option. However, my main peeve my girl tattoos are the choices. No more dolphins, suns or sunflowers! That is so played. Oh, wait. My girl has a sun. Whoops! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.