Tom [Giants fan] Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 I'm sure there are plenty of fantasy football players looking towards the Rams offense for players. Bulger, Holt, Faulk, even Bruce. But that normally explosive offense couldn't score against the Chiefs defense last night. Mind you, the Giants put up 34 against them 10 days earlier. Is there anything to take out of last night's game? Will Bulger be able to keep that offense explosive? Should I keep Tory Holt high on my draft board? Last night raised some concerns. Are they valid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bucaro Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 I would not worry, their offense is based on timing and protection. They are starting three new offensive linemen and Pace has not reported yet. Pay close attention to their o-line before you pick Holt up but they will get their points, it is early Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chachie Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 Faulk is one of my 2 fantasy HBs (he and Portis), so I hope so. Their o-line may send Bulger into a Warneresque downfall this season, though. I think that all the Rams' offensive weapons are still solid as individual players and can still be counted on as 2nd slots. Starters yes, but they are slipping and this may be their LAST good fantasy year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redman Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 I think that the Rams' window of success has closed. I'd still expect a winning record this year, but they're not the same team at all that they were 2-3 years ago. I'm not a particular Bulger fan, Bruce is old as is Faulk, and Holt's the only guy who right now is a bona fide star. Plus their o-line is porous and Turley may miss the year, and Martz has shown that he's very Spurrieresque when it comes to providing pass protection to his QB's. They've slipped back into the league's large middle class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 I think Holt should be fine but I wouldn't expect HUGE numbers from anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 Originally posted by TD_washingtonredskins I think Holt should be fine but I wouldn't expect HUGE numbers from anyone else. I agree...Holt is still worth a late 2nd round/early 3rd round pick...Pace wasn't playing but Marshall Faulk is going to be a question mark...I am staying away from him unless he really falls (3rd or 4th round), Bulger throw a ton of picks last year...too many question marks for me even before last nights game. I say let someone else take a chance on them this year...I am staying away!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 That KC oline is tough, you may want to divert your attention to a KC running back. The greatest show on turf sure didnt look the part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted August 24, 2004 Share Posted August 24, 2004 I had faulk the last two years, he is good if you only want maybe 8 games and 6 good ones from him. I wouldn't put him as your #1 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
![Tom [Giants fan]](http://content.invisioncic.com/Mnflwash/profile/photo-114388.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.