Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Official breakout thread: Is the Portis trade too much for us to surrender.....


Art

Hot or Bushleague? You tell me.  

40 members have voted

  1. 1. Hot or Bushleague? You tell me.

    • Barranquilla Chick
      19
    • RRS
      21


Recommended Posts

The update thread can be for discussing the benefits of Portis here. So can this. But the primary focus of this thread is whether the second rounder PLUS Bailey is too much to surrender on our part.

In my view it's CLEARLY too much. But, it's not too much based on us needing a ton. If we do land Portis the first round pick in the draft defaults to defense and we're looking at needing two or three players in free agency, NOT the draft that essentially make this team very good, very fast.

I think a great corner is harder to find than a great runner. Now, the real question is whether Portis is Emmitt. We KNOW Champ isn't Deion. If Portis is the next true great back you almost surrender any price because it's a fat corner market and Champ simply IS NOT a dominant corner. He's an elite corner. One of the best in football. But he's not dominant. Portis may be the special back who IS dominant.

Coupled with a solid free agent corner you have to seriously consider this as a move you can't pass up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Portis for Bailey and a 2nd is a damn good deal for the Skins. If this deal goes through, I wouldn't be surprised if the Skins trade that 5th overall pick for a 1st in the top 15 and a 2nd rounder. It makes perfect sense, but hell if Portis comes here, I will be the first to buy his jersey.:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is very difficult to compare Portis to a back like Emmitt. One of the things that I thought that Emmitt was so dominant is because he was rarely ever hurt. Portis has already shown some durability issues. That makes me wary, especially in a Gibbs offense that leans so heavily on the ground game.

I really don't think from a value standpoint that giving up Champ and a second round pick is smart.

One point however, maybe the FO is looking at this from a numbers standpoint. Maybe they won't have enough room under the cap to sign all the draft picks and the FAs they want to acquire for the DL and DE.

Just a thought, but it could be a reason that the FO is considering dealing the second rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so because we haven't done well with our 2nd round pick the last couple of years. We can still sure up our DL in FA and then draft Taylor at #5 or Udeze and we are set. Pick up a CB in FA and we are looking at a team with Brunell and Portis as one of the top in the league.

I would preferr a swap in the second but Portis is only 22, 3 years younger then champ. He would sign a deal that is less then champ, I think. He also had 1600 yards in 13 games averaging 300 yards receiving in his first two seasons and averaged 15 tds. To me that is way more valuable then Champ.

Who in the NFC can top this Brunell, Portis, Coles, with Ramsey, and Gardner as well. :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have to look at what's available if you don't make this move and weigh what you're getting here versus what you could get elsewhere. Yes, the dominant corner is harder to find than the dominant running back in general, but it looks this year as though it is a reverse situation. In free agency, the corner market is absolutely deeper with better quality at the top than the running back market. In the draft, neither position is that strong, but considering that we weren't going to take a back in the first round anyway, you have to look at second round possibilities, and those aren't that appealing. I say *if* a mutually beneficial contract can be worked out with Portis, it is a good deal pending a trade down from the number five pick. I can't see how giving up what would probably be 20 million dollars in bonus to Brunell and Portis (and eventually more in FA) would accomodate a number 5 draft pick's bonus. In addition, there will be plenty of D-line talent in the area of the 15 pick (Randy Starks?), and the team would get a replacement 2nd or 3rd round pick to also use on defense, since essentially the original 2nd and 3rd rounders would have been used on offense.

I would love this deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Portis played all 16 games as a rookie, though he didn't start the first four. He then played 13 games last year, AND RETURNED from an injury to finish the season last year, so, it's FAR too early to think he's injury prone. He might be, sure, it's just we can't presume he is on the basis of two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are you guys against this but okay with giving up a #1 for Coles??

Champ is gone we all know that, Portis is the best back next to LT in the league.

This is like getting Marshall Faulk at 22!!!!!!

Portis is a game breaker, Champ is not. Gibbs alwasy uses free agents to win, remember the Plan B's in the 87 and 91 teams.

We haven't drafted well with our 2nd round pick and a couple of years. We can still trade our 5th to get back a second if we wanted.

This is a no brainer.

A healthy Coles, Brunell, Portis, that is a superbowl caliber offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am happy with Portis for Bailey.

I think it is a situation where both teams win.

Hopefully we avoid giving anything extra, if we do it should be less than a 2nd. Perhaps next years second?

Also I would hope before the deal was completed Portis and the Skins agreed on a new long term contract.

Now is the time to 'show Portis the love and respect'. It would make Portis a very happy and loyal Skin while giving the Skins a good value top flight RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 2nd rounder and Champ (who we will lose) for Clinton Portis... HMMM... let's think mathematically... with Champ, we could potentially get a 1st rounder and maybe a second rounder). For argument sake, let's just say a 1st rounder definately. So, a first rounder and a second rounder for Clinton Portis... Isn't that what we were asking for Champ from Detroit? But, let's add the 2nd rounder that we may have gotten in additon for Champ... So, a 1st rounder and 2 second rounder for Clinton Portis? That still sounds good to me for a proven elite RB in the league!! He will run for over 2,000 Yards!! With the picks, there is a risk of busting with young unproven college players. with Clinton Portis, we know what he can do!! As far as other needs? The FA is full of good Corners and D-linemen! Kearse, Washington, Bobby Taylor, and Troy Vincent are definate possibilities!! Let's pull the trigger!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take the deal in a hearbteat. Portis is one of THE premier running backs in the game. Absolutely.

Champ is gone.. no doubt about it, may as well get something for him worthwhile, and a back with Portis' skills IS worthwhile.

As far as giving up our second goes,, heaven forbid,, we might miss out on a chance to draft Taylor Jacobs.

~Bang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you Art. Portis is a remarkable talent, probably one of the best 3-4 RB's in football. But you don't need a great RB to win, you merely need a good one. We've shown time and again under Gibbs and even under Norv and Marty that merely good RB's - Riggins, older version; George Rogers, older version; Riggs, the elder, Byner; Allen; Davis - are sufficient if you have a cohesive line to run the ball.

But there are only a handful of CB's at a given time who are legit "shut down corners", and Bailey's one of them. While this year's FA CB pool is deep, you don't simply replace that.

While I like the fact that Portis is young and is still under contract, I just don't see why we should surrender a 2nd in addition to Bailey for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by bubba9497

Again Champ is THE best cb in the league. RB is easier to fill than cb. All backs in Denver get big yards behind their cheap shot blocking.

Champ is a greater value, you don't give up more.

Champ is not the best cb in the league. He is very good but not the best. He is not a game breaker, Portis is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by National Defense

i agree with booma--portis can win a game on his own. running behind brunell who will force the D to play honest could be huge for the skins.

remember, his stats last year were behind jake and a mediocre denver passing game, and he still went off. this is a no brainer, even with the #2.

Last I checked Denver won with Portis we didn't with Champ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem is most people on this board want the second round pick because of the future. The NFL is not about the future anymore it is about winning now. With Portis on our team we can win it all this year or next. The D will get addressed in FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...