jbooma Posted February 11, 2004 Share Posted February 11, 2004 Remember yesterday when the guy said that they were going to make a trade for Ramsey, who wants to go break the news on their site that it is not going to happen, what a fool :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 A lot of people on THIS board think a trade is possible so convince people here first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WallyG3 Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 WHOA Equality, that new sig is MUCH more attention grabbing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted February 12, 2004 Author Share Posted February 12, 2004 Originally posted by Equality A lot of people on THIS board think a trade is possible so convince people here first. I think most are happy with what Gibbs and Ramsey said today, have you seen or heard it yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 What we need to do is store up that expression of love for Ramsey by the Cowpies and throw it back at them when they 'run him down' during the Cow chip tossing contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey T Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 It's my belief the Redskins showed interest in Brunell to cover up their real interest in signing Dillon from Cincy. Dillon would be nice to have and it would be nice to keep him away from the Boyz. If we can afford Dillon, along with concerns on the DL, that's a direction I would like to see us take. Whatever it takes, there's no doubt in my mind that Joe will get it done:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 Gibbs isn't going to trade Ramsey within the East, he is no idiot If the Redskins trade Ramsey it will be to Miami or an AFC team we will not face but once every four years :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 Originally posted by WallyG3 WHOA Equality, that new sig is MUCH more attention grabbing. Heh, I thought the old black and white one did not scream FREEDOM, well not as much as this one any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanders 83 Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 Joey T, I don't understand why you want Dillon. His team didn't even want to block for him anymore. Not to mention he has quite the rap sheet, and has always been involved with some kind of drama. Problem child all the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dallasfan Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 While I don't think Ramsey will be traded, to assume that he won't be just b/c Gibbs said so is a bit gullible. Why would he announce that he's shopping Ramsey when you guys don't have Brunell. The last thing you want is for some other team to get Brunell, and then have a Ramsey who doesn't want to be in washington. If you guys aquire Brunell, and then gibbs says Ramsey isn't on the block, that's one thing, but until then, Ramsey's status is still up in the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 Originally posted by dallasfan While I don't think Ramsey will be traded, to assume that he won't be just b/c Gibbs said so is a bit gullible. Why would he announce that he's shopping Ramsey when you guys don't have Brunell. The last thing you want is for some other team to get Brunell, and then have a Ramsey who doesn't want to be in washington. If you guys aquire Brunell, and then gibbs says Ramsey isn't on the block, that's one thing, but until then, Ramsey's status is still up in the air. Strike 1 - You're a Dallas fan Strike 2 - You're 19 & therefore I doubt old enough to know anything aboout Gibbs & his character to doubt his word. ie : imply that he's lying about Ramsey's status. Strike 3 - You assume that Ramsey doesn't want to be in D.C. even if Brunell does end up in D.C. after Ramsey has stated here on this board through his brother that he wants to end his pro career in D.C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citigent Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 Originally posted by Joey T It's my belief the Redskins showed interest in Brunell to cover up their real interest in signing Dillon from Cincy. Dillon would be nice to have and it would be nice to keep him away from the Boyz. If we can afford Dillon, along with concerns on the DL, that's a direction I would like to see us take. Whatever it takes, there's no doubt in my mind that Joe will get it done:cool: that sound good as far as brunell goes why come to dc and fight for a starting pos. when it will be giving to him in dallas, so wash loses the brunell(which is their plan) only to take thecowboys out of the dillon race. sounds like something a really smart manwould try to do, oh wait gibbs is running the team. and (sanders83)[ Joey T, I don't understand why you want Dillon. His team didn't even want to block for him anymore. Not to mention he has quite the rap sheet, and has always been involved with some kind of drama. Problem child all the way.] wasnt riggins a problem child also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted February 12, 2004 Share Posted February 12, 2004 Originally posted by Equality A lot of people on THIS board think a trade is possible so convince people here first. Gibbs already said they're not trading him. Gimmie the site name and i'll break 'em down myself. Nothin feels better then to see a cowboys hurt. I'm not a poor sport, i'm a skins fan!!! :dallasuck ------------------------------------- 0-16, 19-0, skins fan till i die!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.