TK

Game Day Thread - Skins at Fins Someone’s Gotta Win

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Cooleyfan1993 said:

Well ya can’t have him!!!!! 

 

:P in all honesty though, it’s not like Tua is the only great QB in this upcoming draft. Herbert and Fromm are supposed to be good, right? 

I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan Snyder & Bruce Allen were huddled up high fiving each other “These idiot fans will be so happy about this win!  They’ll realize that after the firing of Gruden that we know what we are doing!  We are close!  They’ll really believe that ****, ****ing idiots 😂

DF77EFE3-B94B-4A78-A17D-FD65F1D21042.gif

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, -JB- said:

Dan Snyder & Bruce Allen were huddled up high fiving each other “These idiot fans will be so happy about this win!  They’ll realize that after the firing of Gruden that we know what we are doing!  We are close!  They’ll really believe that ****, ****ing idiots 😂

DF77EFE3-B94B-4A78-A17D-FD65F1D21042.gif

Yes sir. We will play 500 ball the rest of the year and we will hear about how close we are.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this game confirmed a lot of stuff:


The team is bad.

Manusky's defense stinks and is easy to figure out.

Adrian Peterson was woefully underutilized by Gruden.

Twenty years later Martyball is still a tough way to win ball games.

McLaurin continues to impress (added because @Ghedrick is correct)

Edited by Burgold
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Burgold said:

I think this game confirmed a lot of stuff:


The team is bad.

Manusky's defense stinks and is easy to figure out.

Adrian Peterson was woefully underutilized by Gruden.

Twenty years later Martyball is still a tough way to win ball games.

You forget that Scary Terry is the real deal.

Edited by Ghedrick
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, BoycottEuphemisticFans said:

this 1 win team winning its first game against a winless and godless abomination that is the dolphins on the game's final play, withstanding a horribly conceived 2 pt play that was dead to rights in the huddle before the ball was snapped is akin to a 42 yr old virgin losing his virginity to some plump girl that he gave money to to stick it in her for a couple of seconds.  nobody is proud of him.  nobody cares.  and only he and maybe 5 other people even care he did it.

 

Hey man, not cool.  That was the best day of my life!  I think I love her.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, sportjunkie07 said:

We could have traded the first pick to whomever had the second pick, then traded down from the second pick. And still have gotten a blue chip player. That's what happens when you have qb desperate teams and 2 very good qb prospects in the draft.

 

It would've been a draft haul that the nfl has never seen before and would've completely revamped our franchise with talent.

 

It also would've guaranteed that Bruce Allen got fired. 

 

Monumental miss by this franchise. 

 

 

LOL  - Seriously! Monumental!  Again, step away from the ledge. It would have been better sure. But monumental? And did you not see what we gave up to get to #2 just from, #6?  C'mon man. I hate this ****ing FO as bad as anyone but this is a serious exaggeration. 

 

Oh, and there is nothing that guarantees Bruce is gone. Certainly the difference between 1-15 and 0-16 is not what determines if Bruce is kept or fired. Hyperbole in it's finiest form my friend!!  LOL  

 

42 minutes ago, FrFan said:

To make believe they're not obviously tanking, then comes the predictable laughable botched 2pt conversion, while they could have gone for the xtra point and play OT. That was the only way they were sure to lose this game

 

Make believe? LOL It's is you and others with this tanking thing that are in lala land!  🙂  Why put Fitz in? Why not go down with Rosen?  They already said he was their guy. Could easily tell people they were letting him learn. And it's much easier to push an EP wide than go through all the theatrics of a botched 2 pt conversion. 

 

Some of you are too funny!  Thanks for the chuckle!  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greg Williams should be our d coordinator.Love his aggression.They are smashing Dak.

Edited by Ghedrick
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mr. Sinister said:

 

You put great evil on us

Bro I just knew that's what would happen -- we cant even lose right smfh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ConnSKINS26 said:

 

That was sniffed out anyways, he wasn't getting in.

 

Yeah the caller wins the jackpot. Calling a RB screen into the teeth of the D....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, goskins10 said:

LOL  - Seriously! Monumental!  Again, step away from the ledge. It would have been better sure. But monumental? And did you not see what we gave up to get to #2 just from, #6?  C'mon man. I hate this ****ing FO as bad as anyone but this is a serious exaggeration. 

 

Oh, and there is nothing that guarantees Bruce is gone. Certainly the difference between 1-15 and 0-16 is not what determines if Bruce is kept or fired. Hyperbole in it's finiest form my friend!!  LOL  

Furthermore, I hardly see the point of doing some draft overhaul of picks if you still have Dan and Bruce doing the picks... That'll be worse than me in our annual Mock draft...

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Wildbunny said:

Furthermore, I hardly see the point of doing some draft overhaul of picks if you still have Dan and Bruce doing the picks... That'll be worse than me in our annual Mock draft...

Look, many of us are in the bargaining stage of the grief process.  Wait till we get to the depression.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, goskins10 said:

 

 

LOL  - Seriously! Monumental!  Again, step away from the ledge. It would have been better sure. But monumental? And did you not see what we gave up to get to #2 just from, #6?  C'mon man. I hate this ****ing FO as bad as anyone but this is a serious exaggeration. 

 

Oh, and there is nothing that guarantees Bruce is gone. Certainly the difference between 1-15 and 0-16 is not what determines if Bruce is kept or fired. Hyperbole in it's finiest form my friend!!  LOL  

GMs in their 10 year don't survive getting the number 1 pick. 

 

And yes I remember what we gave up for rg3. 

 

Now multiply that by 2 and that is what we could realistically receive if we had landed the first pick. The dolphins are loaded with draft picks and would have to give up a bunch to get tua. The bengals, broncos, and Pitt need a qb. If the jets don't win some games than they will need a qb as well. It would be teams desperate for tua and herbert and we would be the team that would benefit from the competition for the 1 and 2 picks. 

 

It is a monumental miss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, sportjunkie07 said:

GMs in their 10 year don't survive getting the number 1 pick. 

 

And yes I remember what we gave up for rg3. 

 

Now multiply that by 2 and that is what we could realistically receive if we had landed the first pick. The dolphins are loaded with draft picks and would have to give up a bunch to get tua. The bengals, broncos, and Pitt need a qb. If the jets don't win some games than they will need a qb as well. It would be teams desperate for tua and herbert and we would be the team that would benefit from the competition for the 1 and 2 picks. 

 

It is a monumental miss.

 

You really believe that 1-15 and is so much better than 0-16 that it helps Bruce keep his job??  GMs with 2 PO appearances and 0 wins in 9 yrs don't survive, yet here we are. And no you can't double what you get from #1 to #2. All pretty much hyperbole. 

 

Again, not saying #1 isn't better than #2, but double? There is a difference but not that much. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, goskins10 said:

 

You really believe that 1-15 and is so much better than 0-16 that it helps Bruce keep his job??  GMs with 2 PO appearances and 0 wins in 9 yrs don't survive, yet here we are. And no you can't double what you get from #1 to #2. All pretty much hyperbole. 

 

Again, not saying #1 isn't better than #2, but double? There is a difference but not that much. 

yeah, lol...

 

swap picks and get 4 first rounds and 2 second round picks? that's crazy talk. you can't talk to someone about going to the moon when they are shooting for pluto.

Edited by xxprodigyxx
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, goskins10 said:

 

You really believe that 1-15 and is so much better than 0-16 that it helps Bruce keep his job??  GMs with 2 PO appearances and 0 wins in 9 yrs don't survive, yet here we are. And no you can't double what you get from #1 to #2. All pretty much hyperbole. 

 

Again, not saying #1 isn't better than #2, but double? There is a difference but not that much. 

Let me walk you through this..

 

What do you think we'd get from the dolphins if we landed the number 1 pick?

 

I think conservatively we could get the number 2 pick this year,, their second this year, and a first next year.

 

Now that we have the number 2 pick, what do you think we could land from either the bengals, jets, broncos, pitt, or titans? I'd say at least their first rounder and 3rd this year along with their 1st next year. 

 

That means we'd end up with the 3rd pick in the draft, and the first choice outside of qb. That is a strong pick.

 

2020

Pick number 3

2.2

3.3

 

2021

2 extra first rounders.

 

That is a ton of draft capital, and it is a conservative guess compared to past trades. 

9 minutes ago, xxprodigyxx said:

yeah, lol...

 

swap picks and get 4 first rounds and 2 second round picks? that's crazy talk. you can't talk to someone about going to the moon when they are shooting for pluto.

History does not support your reasoning. 

Edited by sportjunkie07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sportjunkie07 said:

Let me walk you through this..

 

What do you think we'd get from the dolphins if we landed the number 1 pick?

 

edit

 

Don't need to walk through anything (full disclosure I did not read a single word after walk you through it) as it's all just pure speculation. 

 

And the other poster was making the point that we gave up 2 1sts and 2nd to move to #2. To get double it would be 4 1sts and 2 nds. Not happening..

 

And I am done here. It's a moot point. They won today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, sportjunkie07 said:

Let me walk you through this..

 

What do you think we'd get from the dolphins if we landed the number 1 pick?

 

I think conservatively we could get the number 2 pick this year,, their second this year, and a first next year.

 

Now that we have the number 2 pick, what do you think we could land from either the bengals, jets, broncos, pitt, or titans? I'd say at least their first rounder and 3rd this year along with their 1st next year. 

 

That means we'd end up with the 3rd pick in the draft, and the first choice outside of qb. That is a strong pick.

 

2020

Pick number 3

2.2

3.3

 

2021

2 extra first rounders.

 

That is a ton of draft capital, and it is a conservative guess compared to past trades. 

History does not support your reasoning. 

 

Show me the historical proof that a first pick netted a total of 5 first round picks and 2 second round picks in a trade. or are you referring to series of trade downs?

Edited by xxprodigyxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, goskins10 said:

 

Don't need to walk through anything (full disclosure I did not read a single word after walk you through it) as it's all just pure speculation. 

 

And the other poster was making the point that we gave up 2 1sts and 2nd to move to #2. To get double it would be 4 1sts and 2 nds. Not happening..

 

And I am done here. It's a moot point. They won today.

You can deny sound logic and stay nieve if you'd like. I know it's tough accepting short term pain for long term gain. 

 

Yes it is a moot point but we are still in the running for pick 1, but it just got a lot more difficult. 

2 minutes ago, xxprodigyxx said:

 

Show me the historical proof that a first pick netted a total of 5 first round picks and 2 second round picks in a trade. or are you referring to series of trade downs?

Series. I didnt mention quite that much. My guess was conservative based on history. 

Edited by sportjunkie07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.