CousinsCowgirl84 Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 5 minutes ago, The Sisko said: That’s irrelevant. Do you think Tя☭mp would have acted any differently if the UN hadn’t? Im sure it would have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 Trump hasn't demonstrated over and over that he doesn't give a **** about the U.N. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngestson Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 1 hour ago, DogofWar1 said: There are certain code words, which when spoken, functionally speaking, "activate" their base. "Benghazi" is one of those words. Sure, none of what he just said made any sense in the grander context of justifying the Soleimani killing, but so long as you slip that word in there, bam, base on board. "Benghazi" also serves the useful role of immediately telling you if the person in question has a point or is a political hack. Still going on about a debunked Q-Anon/Info Wars level conspiracy years down the road indicates an attempt at stoking the base and trolling them libtards rather than an actual intelligent point. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 he could mean there will be the security and backup needed that was missing at Benghazi 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 17 minutes ago, twa said: he could mean there will be the security and backup needed that was missing at Benghazi This makes no sense in the context of an imminent threat and it's no surprise @CousinsCowgirl84 liked this comment. If there was a threat, he would say that we have taken precautionary measures and that embassies are made aware when the threat is deemed imminent and serious. Of course this wasn't the case but hey, don't let that stop you from attempting to defend at all costs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 19 minutes ago, twa said: he could mean there will be the security and backup needed that was missing at Benghazi And at Baghdad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 Shocked he actually knew of Suleimani before 3 weeks ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 9 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: Shocked he actually knew of Suleimani before 3 weeks ago. He owed him money. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 19 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: Shocked he actually knew of Suleimani before 3 weeks ago. Oh he for sure didn't, but his administration has been such a rotating cesspool of shady characters with their own motivations that I am sure the name Soleimani had been floated by him several times as "bad guy" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted January 13, 2020 Author Share Posted January 13, 2020 (edited) 🤢🤮 Edited January 13, 2020 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: Shocked he actually knew of Suleimani before 3 weeks ago. a lot of assumptions are unwinding. not unplanned not strengthening the Iranian regime not starting ww3 decision to lie is bizzaire, specially when they’ve proved to be so bad at it Edited January 13, 2020 by CousinsCowgirl84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted January 13, 2020 Author Share Posted January 13, 2020 (edited) Edited January 13, 2020 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 The killing of Suleimani would’ve strengthened to regime. The downing of the airliner is the major problem. No one said the act of killing Suleimani was unplanned. What wasn’t done is consulting with anyone nor considering long term consequences. You sure do make up a lot of stuff to attempt to strengthen your claims. 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 17 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said: decision to lie is bizzaire You new to this discussion? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 45 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said: a lot of assumptions are unwinding. not unplanned not strengthening the Iranian regime not starting ww3 decision to lie is bizzaire, specially when they’ve proved to be so bad at it re: final point I think that may be his default setting kicking in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Larry said: You new to this discussion? nah, but I didn’t want y’all getting all worked up about his motives/getting credit. 3 hours ago, Hersh said: You sure do make up a lot of stuff to attempt to strengthen your claims. which claims? Edited January 13, 2020 by CousinsCowgirl84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Larry said: You new to this discussion? Seems to think that he's a good honest man. Have to remember though, claims to not support him. Just wants to constantly defend him. Edited January 13, 2020 by Skintime 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 (edited) 38 minutes ago, Skintime said: Seems to think that he's a good honest man. Have to remember though, claims to not support him. Just wants to constantly defend him. You are attributing to her the exact opposite (literally the exact opposite) of what she was complaining about the President over (his lies). Edited January 13, 2020 by nonniey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 16 minutes ago, nonniey said: You are attributing to her the exact opposite (literally the exact opposite) of what she was complaining about the President over (his lies). She does complain about his lies and I see that, but there is a defense of his policies that is rather constant. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted January 13, 2020 Author Share Posted January 13, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted January 13, 2020 Author Share Posted January 13, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Skintime said: She does complain about his lies and I see that, but there is a defense of his policies that is rather constant. His policies and other actions. She can complain about the lies because she doesn’t really care that he lies all the time, but it’s just something she can use to check her off as not being a full blown cult member. But when every other post is understatedly about how everything he’s doing is working, how much he’s winning, how he’s so strategic against the Dems, or outright defenses and deflections etc...well, people can draw the obvious conclusions Edited January 13, 2020 by Momma There Goes That Man 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 1 minute ago, Momma There Goes That Man said: His policies and other actions. She can complain about the lies because she doesn’t really care that he lies all the time, but it’s just something she can use to check her off as not being a full blown cult member. But when every other post is understatedly about how everything he’s doing is working, how much he’s winning, how he’s so strategic against the Dems, or outright defenses and deflections etc...well, people can draw the obvious conclusions could you please link or quote to where i said trump was strategic against democrats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted January 14, 2020 Author Share Posted January 14, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now