Owls0325

Prehistoric development with new speculation: Trent Williams wants to be traded/released

Recommended Posts

As I said in the other thread, I hope we trade him.  Would get back at least a 2020 2nd round pick, would take his contract off the books, and would give us further incentive to sit Haskins his rookie year.  Works for me.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's got the 9th highest cap hit among O-Line in the league.  That's not peanuts.  At least this way it gives other guys some necessary reps as #1 LT?  Is Geron Christian healthy and in mini-camp?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's just had a major health scare, is probably paid 20/30% under market rate now. I say fair enough, pay him another 3/4mil per year over the short term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if he actually asked for a trade then I would say trade him.  His agent must feel he has maximum leverage since the Skins are short on Tackles.  His current annual pay may be less than the newest contracts but he has missed a lot of games on his current contract.  His agent knows that Trent's likelihood of getting another big contract is going to be much lower in two years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trents not getting any younger or healthier but he is still an elite tackle.

 

He's out of contract though at the end of next season at $12.5M with per game roster bonus of $250K (so $16.5M total). His cap number this year and next is just over $14M. There might be away to add a couple of years to the deal, give him some new money and reduce his cap impact this year and next to create some room to add some talent next offseason.

 

I don't like extending players who are over 30 though and have injury history.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Since it was Rapoport I didn't take it fully seriously.  But the Hawksworth report makes me take it a little more seriously.  Still want to see what happens tomorrow or whatever since we don't know for sure that this is a fact.

 

But if it is, I'd trade him if they can.   He signed a monster contract in 2015 so just because some have surpassed him since that time -- he's unhappy?  That's assuming its about the year to year salary versus purely about an extension.  but my larger point is you can count on him to miss 25% of every season.  And  he is one violation away from a one year suspension.   He hasn't played a full season since 2013.  So they are supposed to think that things will get better as he goes deeper into his 30s?  

 

He's a great player but he's also an aging injury prone dude.   Again, this is if this is true.  I think there is a shot that it isn't true.

 

 

 

Edited by Skinsinparadise
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
1
2 minutes ago, MartinC said:

 

 

I don't like extending players who are over 30 though and have injury history.

 and a suspension or two.

 

I don't care if these guys smoke weed. It's not a PED. But the NFL still cares.

 

If the report is accurate....that's frustrating. 13 missed games the past 3 years. Any kind of deal would need clauses that involve staying on the field because they are already paying a lot for a QB who may never play again.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO he has been a great and loyal Redskin & has been the best LT in the game. But you can’t give a guy with his recent injury history and age a high paying new deal. The right thing is trade him and get something for him. 

 

No no hard feelings Trent you are the man but if this team is ever going to crawl out of misery it starts with taking emotion out of the decision. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HTTRDynasty said:

I’m sure the Hard Knocks crew is licking their chops. 

 

If he's holding out...he won't be at training camp.  So not much to go by in terms of juicy footage right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Alcoholic Zebra said:

 

If he's holding out...he won't be at training camp.  So not much to go by in terms of juicy footage right?

 

Check the Hard Knocks with the Jets when Revis was holding out.

 

1 minute ago, Redskins Reparations said:

 

Didn’t HBO announce they were going with Detroit this year?

That's a rumor.  Just like there were rumors for the Skins and Raiders.  The Lions HC came out today and said he's heard nothing from Hard Knocks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Age, injury history.  Nope.

 

If it wasn't for the injuries I'd be ok with it.  

 

 

 

I wonder how much having a rookie QB has to do with this.  Trent knows he might have a little bit more leverage here because they know they REALLY need him to protect the kid.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be okay with Trent going, but only if we get Scherff signed. Losing both our best linemen would be a huge setback.

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought...I remember there being reports during and after the draft that we were reaching out to other teams asking if they'd be willing to trade for any of our vets in a trade-up scenario.  Maybe Trent's name was brought up, it got back to him, and he took offence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is true, then some good points made by some on twitter.  Trent has better leverage than ever.  Ty is gone.  And they are trying to protect a rookie QB. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Restructure. Give him more guaranteed money, keep him around for three years with a low out in year three. It’s not my money and once we clear Norman, Smith and Reed off the books we’ll be in ok salary shape. Keeping Haskins upright and confident is key so we need our LT.

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PartyPosse said:

Restructure. Give him more guaranteed money, keep him around for three years with a low out in year three. It’s not my money and once we clear Norman, Smith and Reed off the books we’ll be in ok salary shape. Keeping Haskins upright and confident is key so we need our LT.

 

Agree.

 

Alternative view - trade him, pay Scherff and move him to tackle. Play the rookies at guard. Not sure Trent has a great amount of trade value though, 2nd or 3rd rounder maybe. May as well pay him more for 2 or 3 years as above.

 

Trent probably wants two years on good cash before the strike and him retiring early.....

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of good tackles in the 2020 draft. Call his bluff. I realize he's the only starting-caliber tackle we've had on the roster the last few years, but at 31 and with injury-plagued seasons as of late, I'm not giving him a bucketload of money. There will be options.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, UK SKINS FAN '74 said:

 

Agree.

 

Alternative view - trade him, pay Scherff and move him to tackle. Play the rookies at guard. Not sure Trent has a great amount of trade value though, 2nd or 3rd rounder maybe. May as well pay him more for 2 or 3 years as above.

 

Trent probably wants two years on good cash before the strike and him retiring early.....

The problem with this is that Scherff may want LT money instead of guard money and we can’t pay him unless we know he’s capable of holding down the fort. Our best bet is keeping Williams.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.