visionary Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 (edited) Uh....ok. Good thing Trump never met him. Edited January 26, 2020 by visionary 1 Link to post Share on other sites
thegreaterbuzzette Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 5 minutes ago, StillUnknown said: I think its more she was smart enough to know how to read a poll and be realistic. she had a moment, couldn't capitalize on it. its less embarrassing to get out early than it would have been to stay in and eventually come in 4th or worse in her home state But most of those that eventually got elected werent ahead in the polls at that point. Maybe it's nothing, my gut tells me it was "something". 1 Link to post Share on other sites
TheGreatBuzz Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 I think Kamala got out before the mud slinging started so she would be relatively clean and get the AG spot for whoever (Dem) wins. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Dan T. Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 I think the democrats should say “We are perfectly willing to have extensive hearings about the children of office holders being given positions they are totally unqualified for. When would you like OUR list of witnesses?” 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Rdskns2000 Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 This thing will be over quick, if they vote no on new witnesses. Senate Republicans eye quick Trump acquittal after witness vote Link to post Share on other sites
StillUnknown Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 I'm not sure either of those 2 beings are actually alive 1 Link to post Share on other sites
China Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 1 hour ago, StillUnknown said: I'm not sure either of those 2 beings are actually alive They Live 1 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Destino Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 1 hour ago, StillUnknown said: I'm not sure either of those 2 beings are actually alive Necromancy would explain why we're swamped with unconfirmed reports of dead people voting every election. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
EmirOfShmo Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 9 hours ago, visionary said: I don't understand why White House Occupant waited 1 year before getting rid of Yuvanovich. Here he's saying "get rid of her". But it's a year before she gets fired. Who in that room had the authority to fire her (besides him)? And why smear her for a year instead of just firing her? There's gotta be something else going on that hasn't been made public. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Larry Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 34 minutes ago, EmirOfShmo said: And why smear her for a year instead of just firing her? To try to prevent her from going to the press with "I was fired for not going along with an illegal conspiracy." 1 Link to post Share on other sites
EmirOfShmo Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 11 minutes ago, Larry said: To try to prevent her from going to the press with "I was fired for not going along with an illegal conspiracy." Which she did anyway when she was questioned by Congress. It's the timing I'm questioning. The Parnas video is from April 30, 2018. She was asked to return to the US on April 25, 2019 and terminated May 20, 2019. Why wait 1 year to get rid of her? She was there thru the entire Rudy ruse - why keep her around to see that firsthand? Stupidity? Link to post Share on other sites
@SkinsGoldPants Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 I always figured the most diehard elected supporters of Don were also dragged in on this. So far, you don't hear that Nunes, or Jordan or Graham in any of these clips. Maybe they are just smart enough to stay away from these Mobster meetings. Either way, Bondy would be smarter to release snippets of the audio every day. Bulk release gets you 24 hours of attention. He knows his client is a criminal also. There is no honor amongst thieves. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
StillUnknown Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 the senators who feigned outrage at Schiff remarks are making the rounds on the sunday shows to lie some more media gonna media Link to post Share on other sites
Burgold Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 1 hour ago, EmirOfShmo said: Which she did anyway when she was questioned by Congress. It's the timing I'm questioning. The Parnas video is from April 30, 2018. She was asked to return to the US on April 25, 2019 and terminated May 20, 2019. Why wait 1 year to get rid of her? She was there thru the entire Rudy ruse - why keep her around to see that firsthand? Stupidity? Because they probably thought they could pressure her to play along or quit just as they have corrupted all these members of Congress. It probably took a year to realize that Yanovich actually was working for America not for cynical reasons and didn't want to be bought off. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
RedskinsFan44 Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 42 minutes ago, @SkinsGoldPants said: I always figured the most diehard elected supporters of Don were also dragged in on this. So far, you don't hear that Nunes, or Jordan or Graham in any of these clips. Maybe they are just smart enough to stay away from these Mobster meetings. Either way, Bondy would be smarter to release snippets of the audio every day. Bulk release gets you 24 hours of attention. He knows his client is a criminal also. There is no honor amongst thieves. Like WikiLeaks. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooked Crack Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 (edited) Trump isn't going to change his behavior and he sure as hell isn't going to do math. Edited January 26, 2020 by Cooked Crack 3 Link to post Share on other sites
EmirOfShmo Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 13 minutes ago, Burgold said: Because they probably thought they could pressure her to play along or quit just as they have corrupted all these members of Congress. It probably took a year to realize that Yanovich actually was working for America not for cynical reasons and didn't want to be bought off. Maybe, but I'm not buying it. Not when a crowd of people are told to get rid of her. They knew 1 year before she's fired she was a problem for their scheme. They're telling lies to White House Occupant that she's bad-mouthing him. So he says get rid of her & then they keep her around for a year. It just doesn't make sense to me. Link to post Share on other sites
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 I agree that he’ll put 2 and 2 together. Link to post Share on other sites
Dan T. Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: Trump isn't going to change his behavior and he sure as hell isn't going to do math. Senator Braun, you are either a shameless apologist for Trump or a ****ing dope. ONE DAY after Robert Mueller publicly reported on a months long investigation into foreign interference in a Presidential election, Donald Trump solicited foreign interference in a Presidential election. ONE DAY later. He has NEVER shown shame, remorse, or introspection. Nobody with a lick of sense is buying what you are selling. Edited January 26, 2020 by Dan T. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
clietas Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 (edited) Trump's going to be the one to hold Trump accountable? Edited January 26, 2020 by clietas 1 Link to post Share on other sites
visionary Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 I assume Republicans will be condemning and censoring Trump now. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts