mistertim Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Oh good. Here we go again with "Trump literally didn't come up to you and say 'Hello, I wish to bribe someone', right?" "No" "CASE CLOSED!" HAHAHA. "He didn't say 'Go talk to Rudy', just said 'Talk to Rudy', right???" "Um, I guess?" "SO IT WASN'T A DEMAND! CASE CLOSED!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Goddam It somebody needs to mooooo at Nunes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 Oh my god, this is so pathetic. “Trump said talk to Rudy” but he didn’t say “GO talk to Rudy”. This is their defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 12 minutes ago, Jumbo said: any human with a semi-honest semi-functional brain should have been able to tell all of this (along with just what a ****show trumpco would be well before he announced his candidacy---except for the racists cum nationalists, homophobes, the uber-hypocritical magical thinker "pro life" sacks of ****, science deniers, incels, the generally really dumb and really malevolent "hard right" folks, nutter xtians (some of these overlap of course---real winners), people who put a few more $$$ in their portfolio over all ethics/morality (you people are true scum in my book) and other flotsam and jetsam ideally, an entire generation of "republicans" should be thoroughly rejected and ostracized in every manner possible for the breadth, depth, and longevity of their dysfunctional **** Extra points for using flotsam and jetsam in your post. It's probably one of my favorite phrases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 How does one end up sitting behind these people testifying or asking questions? I mean the ones close enough to be in every camera shot. That has to be a punishment of some sort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, mistertim said: HAHAHA. "He didn't say 'Go talk to Rudy', just said 'Talk to Rudy', right???" "Um, I guess?" "SO IT WASN'T A DEMAND! CASE CLOSED!" It’s hard to believe that these are the lengths the GOP is willing to go for a completely inept, and frankly, dumb person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, Jumbo said: any human with a semi-honest semi-functional brain should have been able to tell all of this (along with just what a ****show trumpco would be well before he announced his candidacy---except for the racists cum nationalists, homophobes, the uber-hypocritical magical thinker "pro life" sacks of ****, science deniers, incels, the generally really dumb and really malevolent "hard right" folks, nutter xtians (some of these overlap of course---real winners), people who put a few more $$$ in their portfolio over all ethics/morality (you people are true scum in my book) and other flotsam and jetsam ideally, an entire generation of "republicans" should be thoroughly rejected and ostracized in every manner possible for the breadth, depth, and longevity of their dysfunctional **** It's hard to keep track of the timeline, but things that I'm pretty sure we knew about Trump before the election: Russian government intelligence was actively helping him. He had bragged about strolling through the dressing room of teenaged beauty pageant contestants. Listed is as one of the benefits he was entitled to, because of his position. He had a reputation for failing to pay amounts due on contracts he had signed. Felt that that, also, was a benefit he was entitled to, because of his position. He had attacked John McCain for being a POW. (After paying for a fake medical exemption from the draft.) He had mocked a handicapped person (a reporter?) for being handicapped. (And his supporters loved it.) He had encouraged the crowds at his events to attack protesters. He stated that the US immigration system should discriminate based on religion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, No Excuses said: Oh my god, this is so pathetic. “Trump said talk to Rudy” but he didn’t say “GO talk to Rudy”. This is their defense. I have no clue what's even next. Maybe "Ok so he said 'Talk to rudy', but with a lowercase R, correct? So maybe it wasn't the actual PERSON Rudy Giuliani, but an abstraction of Rudy Giuliani...the idea of a Rudy Giuliani?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Sondland is beginning to push back a bit now. Edit: 2 + 2 = 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 lol. "Someone talked to Trump and he denied it!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Vehemently denied it. Or was vehement about denial. Big distinction there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, PCS said: Vehemently denied it. Or was vehement about denial. Big distinction there. True. That's the real game changer. If Trump was vehement about it it means he was obviously telling the truth, as opposed to what we've seen in the past which is where the more vehement Trump is when denying something the more likely it is that it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Steve Castors voice makes me want to hear him bellow out a Fozzie bear style “waka waka!” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, mistertim said: True. That's the real game changer. If Trump was vehement about it it means he was obviously telling the truth, as opposed to what we've seen in the past which is where the more vehement Trump is when denying something the more likely it is that it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, StillUnknown said: The audience is the base that must be held at all costs. And it’s abundantly clear now that they do in fact think their base is mostly gullible idiots. Ken Starr is about to become “failed Clinton impeachment lawyer” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 "So if I came up to you and punched you in the face but said 'I am NOT assaulting you' then you have no way to prove that I assaulted you right? Having a bloody nose and another witness to me punching you in the face doesn't matter" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 Castor is trying to make the argument now that this isn’t about the Biden’s when in the “perfect call”, Trump himself names the Bidens and Nunes keeps harping on about the Bidens. They really, really absolutely think their base audience is just thumb sucking Neanderthals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDoyler23 Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, @SkinsGoldPants said: Scheduled tweet gone awry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 4 minutes ago, No Excuses said: Castor is trying to make the argument now that this isn’t about the Biden’s when in the “perfect call”, Trump himself names the Bidens and Nunes keeps harping on about the Bidens. They really, really absolutely think their base audience is just thumb sucking Neanderthals. All evidence indicates that they are right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 The "Trump didn't personally tell you he wanted to commit a crime, right?" defense is pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, NoCalMike said: The "Trump didn't personally tell you he wanted to commit a crime, right?" defense is pathetic. James Comey can testify under oath that Donald Trump personally ordered him to obstruct an FBI counterintelligence investigation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.