visionary Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozo the kKklown Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 4 hours ago, BenningRoadSkin said: How about "collusion"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busch1724 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Extortion, bribery, collusion, etc. would suffice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Easy follow up. Is it impeachable to withhold 400 million in military assistance while asking for foreign interference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Don't expect Rs to deviate from Supreme Leader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: Easy follow up. Is it impeachable to withhold 400 million in military assistance while asking for foreign interference? Withholding 400 million in congressionally approved aid to an ally until they help you politically. Doesn’t matter, the “it’s inappropriate but not impeachable” defense won’t work either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted November 10, 2019 Author Share Posted November 10, 2019 17 minutes ago, Momma There Goes That Man said: Withholding 400 million in congressionally approved aid to an ally until they help you politically. Doesn’t matter, the “it’s inappropriate but not impeachable” defense won’t work either Completely gutless stance. There is no behavior that the GOP will not tolerate as long as it keeps power. These are dangerous people with bad ideas and they seem to have decided that abuse of campaign finance laws and compromising election security and integrity is worth winning elections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 i've hated seeing hurd cave in as much as he has lately, and my other house r fave kinzinger isn't far behind, sadly....it would take work, but they could still make goper-supporting arguments without sacrificing their integrity to party interests or aggressively attacking trump emo/sentiment wise, as well as in terms of "justice", losing office for all gopers even if such were possible is far from sufficient consequences in my book my book on that would read more like, well, you know...certain other books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Quote He's had criminal intent. At least from the point he took office. Certainly when he tried to get the head of the FBI to obstruct an investigation. Oh, and . . . It's just another variation of "no collusion" or "quid pro quo" 1) There's no requirement that he meet that bar. 2) And, he meets that bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Quote “Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, who has testified under oath, is serving on the National Security Council currently,” CBS News’s “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan said during her interview with O’Brien. “Will he continue to work for you despite testifying against the President?” “Well look, one of the things that I’ve talked about is that we’re streamlining the National Security Council,” O’Brien replied. “It got bloated to like 236 people up from 100 in the Bush administration under President Obama.” The national security adviser said Vindman, who currently serves as the council’s Director for European Affairs, will be removed as a part of the White House’s “streamlining” efforts. “My understanding is he’s–that Colonel Vindman is detailed from the Department of Defense,” O’Brien said. “So everyone who’s detailed at the NSC, people are going to start going back to their own departments and we’ll bring in new folks.” When Brennan asked O’Brien to confirm that the decision is not retaliation against Vindman, whom Trump has baselessly accused of being a “Never Trumper,” the national security adviser’s response was that he personally had never retaliated against anyone. “I never retaliated against anyone,” he said. “There- there will be a point for everybody who’s detailed there—that their time, that their detail will come to an end.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 1 hour ago, visionary said: They are witnesses, Donald. They're witnessing every bit of your mental collapse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 An intelligence agency that fears intelligence. How's that usually play out, Cap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokerPacker Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 42 minutes ago, Larry said: An intelligence agency that fears intelligence. How's that usually play out, Cap? It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 The outing of whistleblower is very troubling to me. There needs to be jail time and a huge fine for those who mention who the person is. These so-called white collar crimes don't punish enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, visionary said: Other than the fact that he's said so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.