js79 Posted December 14, 2003 Share Posted December 14, 2003 I'm sorry the dude sucks people can defend him but from my eyes, he hasn't really DONE anything... he gets rid of the ball fast with some dinky lil passes that ANYONE could make and his deep balls take EONS to get there this is so frustrating.. can we PLEASE change QBS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuji869 Posted December 14, 2003 Share Posted December 14, 2003 No QB controversy here, Patrick Ramsey is the man in 2004! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted December 14, 2003 Share Posted December 14, 2003 Originally posted by js79 I'm sorry the dude sucks people can defend him but from my eyes, he hasn't really DONE anything... he gets rid of the ball fast with some dinky lil passes that ANYONE could make and his deep balls take EONS to get there this is so frustrating.. can we PLEASE change QBS He's forced multiple throws today. But reasonable folks never expected him to be anything BUT a backup....put him out there and hope he won't LOSE the game for us. He lost the game for us today, in large part because our Head Coach refuses to acknowledge reality and playcall accordingly. If ever there was a game where 50 rushing plays were called for, this was it. And he still couldn't bring himself to do it. Don't blame Hassleback. Blame your Head Coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
js79 Posted December 15, 2003 Author Share Posted December 15, 2003 its kinda hard to run the ball when you are down.. people talk about if you run the ball more then you win well the reason u run it more is because you are WINNING when you are down 17 points or even 14, you HAVE to eventually put it in the air.. the defense has made there stops today, not outstanding but they did there part.. the offense is just horrendous.. whoever that said Tim Hasselbeck is a better fit for this offense is a friggin idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boy2Der Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 he just through another INT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvoSkins Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 6/24 for 56 yards and 4 Ints, nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a_good_brotha Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 And to think people actually thought there would be a QB controversy.:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a_good_brotha Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Originally posted by js79 its kinda hard to run the ball when you are down.. people talk about if you run the ball more then you win well the reason u run it more is because you are WINNING when you are down 17 points or even 14, you HAVE to eventually put it in the air.. the defense has made there stops today, not outstanding but they did there part.. the offense is just horrendous.. whoever that said Tim Hasselbeck is a better fit for this offense is a friggin idiot Amen to that. The Skins did run the ball. You can't run every down. This is a subpar performance by the offense, mainly Hasselbeck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyGator Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 How can any front office not have a seasoned decent QB on your team when you have a former NFL QB as a coach? That has boggled my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
js79 Posted December 15, 2003 Author Share Posted December 15, 2003 we had rob johnson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 It is almost a good thing this happened(except for it being against the cowboys) so it will **** everyone up about a QB contraversy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 We were down 2 TD's. We had the ball to start the second half. We needed to be patient and stick to what was working (relatively so) in the first half. A good coach sees Hasselback's 1st half and KNOWS its just not his day. You either make a change (granted...in this case, is that really an option??) or you try and stick to whats working. I'm not saying we win in this scenario. But you know we aren't going to win with Tim putting it up for grabs for the bulk of the 2nd half. Sorry, but with 2 quarters to go, anything can happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gillherb Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 HASSELBECK'S QB RATING WAS 0.0 AT ONE POINT AND HE MITE HAVE FINISHED THE GAME WITH THAT RATING...OUR OFFENSE WAS HORRIBLY INEPT TODAY, WE COULDN'T DO ANYTHING WHATSOEVER no matter what we say about being patient, today was ridiculously frustrating, we make the cowboys look like hall of famers every time we play them, even though they lose to other teams, im glad our defense played pretty well, but we are atrocious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 0.0 QB rating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Originally posted by js79 its kinda hard to run the ball when you are down.. people talk about if you run the ball more then you win well the reason u run it more is because you are WINNING when you are down 17 points or even 14, you HAVE to eventually put it in the air.. The thing is, we were only down by 7 when we stopped rushing. All of our successful drives in the first half were driven by Rock Cartwright and wasted by Hassleback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RF4L Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Patrick will suck next year, too, with this joke of an organization. Sorry, but it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjTj Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Originally posted by js79 we had rob johnson ...who Spurrier never liked... We could've kept Wuerffel, but all he could've done is made this game LOOK better. I think Heath Shuler off the street could've played better than Hasselbeck today. At least there's no QB controversy any more. Ramsey is the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJWatson3 Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Originally posted by RF4L Patrick will suck next year, too, with this joke of an organization. Sorry, but it's true. wrong hombre. we could have won this game with pat in there. problem number one was playcalling. we were running the ball so well, but everytime we passed it seemed to result in a turnover, or near turnover. i became afraid of seeing tim pass, but damn ROCK looked awesome in there. timmy's TO's ruined any chance of winning. ramsey, even when under incredible pressure (more than TH has seen this season), still has the moxy to complete over 50% of his throws for much better than a 1:1 TD to INT ratio. Ramsey has arm strength, which is half the reason TH can't succeed. how many times did you see a ball skip in front of a WR, or did he float one over the WR, or did he just force it when the ball should have been sailing out of bounds (or in Rock's hands to begin with)????? a pethetic game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyGator Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 How were we running the ball so well? They weren't respecting the run and our long run for the day was 13 yards on 25 carries. This team has a serious lack of talent at the skill positions on offense. I'm surprised Hasselbeck was kept in the whole game. 4 interceptions, 6 completions. Barker looked better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 We were running the ball well it was when they discovered they didnt need to respect the pass was when you saw Roy Williams closer to the line than the linebackers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJWatson3 Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 rock rushed for almost 100 yards. and goddamn if this isn't the worst stat i have ever seen: we averaged 2.0 yards per pass, half of what we averaged rushing (4.1). that is embarrasing. we were 2-2 on fourth downs though... maybe we should have gone for more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Now hopefully we can see how good hamsamich is. The worse he can do is 0.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Originally posted by JerseyGator How were we running the ball so well? They weren't respecting the run and our long run for the day was 13 yards on 25 carries. This team has a serious lack of talent at the skill positions on offense. I'm surprised Hasselbeck was kept in the whole game. 4 interceptions, 6 completions. Barker looked better! We don't have a 'serious lack'. What we have is our starting QB out for the year, and our top RB's out for the game as well. Thats the ENTIRE BACKFIELD. And Hasselback's backup has barely taken a regular season snap. And yeah. Compared to our passing attack, our running game was a freaking juggernaut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Why did we lose Simple when you turn the ball over 6 times, when you don't have a turnover you can't make a first down.... not even a 3rd and 1 RUNNING. and the QB couldn't hit the broad side of the barn today. Dallas played a good game, and Washington helped in about every way we could. It is terrible to lose to Dallas It is terrible to get shutout but getting shut out by the Cowboys ......No one show me a loaded pistol right now. It is not the end of the world, but damn it is depressing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted December 15, 2003 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Originally posted by NavyDave We were running the ball well it was when they discovered they didnt need to respect the pass was when you saw Roy Williams closer to the line than the linebackers ain't that the truth. half way through the second quarter they knew they didn't need anyone to cover the WR, unless he wanted an easy INT. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.