Larry Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 Re: Milo: So, Herschel Walker's response to him publicly announcing his praise for Hitler, is to fire a subordinate? He trying for a "I thought praising Hitler was a bad look, but one of my subordinates wanted me to, so I did it anyway?" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 41 minutes ago, Larry said: Re: Milo: So, Herschel Walker's response to him publicly announcing his praise for Hitler, is to fire a subordinate? He trying for a "I thought praising Hitler was a bad look, but one of my subordinates wanted me to, so I did it anyway?" Herschel Walker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 17 minutes ago, China said: Herschel Walker? Correction noted. Hey, I'm 65 now. Obviously I'm unfit to be President. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 (edited) On 12/3/2022 at 5:09 PM, TradeTheBeal! said: I’m about 70% sure I saw Candace Owens out on the streets of South Beach last night. She was dining at one of those joints that have tables out on the sidewalk. Also, I’m about 100% sure I was 8-9 beers deep at that point and wearing my contacts…which means I couldn’t see ****. Candace Owens Who TradetheBeal! saw Edited December 7, 2022 by Dan T. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 Wait, so Kayne goes on Alex Jones and praises Hitler...and Milo gets fired for it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 18 hours ago, Captain Wiggles said: Back to interning for MTG Milo? 🤭 Vet Min + incentives? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 (edited) Edited December 5, 2022 by Riggo-toni 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Giuliani pressed on role in Trump 2020 election reversal legal gambits during attorney discipline hearing Rudy Giuliani defended his work on former President Donald Trump’s 2020 election-reversal gambits as he testified Monday in attorney disciplinary proceedings in Washington, DC. Over the course of several hours of questioning by the chief lawyer in the DC Bar’s disciplinary office, Giuliani acknowledged he was now fuzzy on the election procedures in Pennsylvania – where he signed onto a lawsuit challenging Trump’s defeat that is at the heart of current attorney ethics charges – and he pushed back on the idea that the fraud allegations made in the lawsuit needed to be more specific. “You don’t start a lawsuit being able to prove – I mean, you’re very lucky when you do. You don’t start a lawsuit being able to prove, but being able to responsibly allege,” the former New York City mayor said. “I was responsibly alleging, based on the things that were told to me by other people. I wasn’t proving – I had a long way to go to prove.” The Board on Professional Responsibility is hearing testimony from Giuliani and other witnesses as it weighs whether the lawsuit he brought on behalf of Trump’s 2020 campaign put him in violation of attorney ethics rules. The disciplinary proceedings have a shape similar to a trial, with several witnesses including Giuliani testifying. The disciplinary process, which was launched by DC Disciplinary Counsel Hamilton Fox, has several more steps to go before final resolution. During Monday’s hearing, Fox grilled Giuliani on the logic of the Pennsylvania lawsuit, where the Trump campaign was seeking to throw out hundreds of thousands of mail ballots, and what evidence the Trump team had to support its mass fraud allegations. In one exchange, Fox pointed to an account referenced in the lawsuit about ballots being damaged by one Pennsylvania county’s ballot opening machines. He asked Giuliani what other evidence could be combined with that account to allege fraud. “Of course, I didn’t know that at the beginning of litigation. No lawyer would know that, Mr. Fox,” Giuliani said. “You find that out when you take discovery. You find that out when you when you ask further questions. I’m in this case for two days.” Click on the link for the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Not long till the Republican Party is officially against the civil rights act 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Totally mind-bending to imagine a life path for anyone that involves coming across a clip of Ben Shapiro online and thinking to oneself, “Finally! Here is an intellectual that gets to the heart of the matter. A clarion voice for our challenging times. I must share this!” #timcast 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 12th Commandment Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: Not long till the Republican Party is officially against the civil rights act It's like Hitler's sentient mustache reproduced and became ben Shapiro's eyebrows. Edited December 6, 2022 by The 12th Commandment 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabbyrwock Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 23 minutes ago, The 12th Commandment said: It's like Hitler's sentient mustache reproduced and became ben Shapiro's eyebrows. Sentient mustache reminded me of this...used to love The Tick. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: Not long till the Republican Party is officially against the civil rights act As opposed to "opposed to it, but not willing to quite say so, except in front of the right room". Like their position on abortion. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simmsy Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 On 12/4/2022 at 7:04 PM, Larry said: Correction noted. Hey, I'm 65 now. Obviously I'm unfit to be President. However, you're mentally fit enough to be a werewolf...which Walker is also unfit to become. Also, technically been is right. You can ban Jewish people and blacks from your restaurant just not for being Jewish or black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 (edited) On 12/3/2022 at 12:46 PM, China said: Just another of the many crimes of TFG: I don't know about "THIS IS BIG." There are lots of TFG's crimes that were bigger and he still hasn't been charged with anything yet. Just another for the pile. "Corruption": Democrats sound the alarm on alleged Trump pardon bribery scheme U.S. House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Raúl Grijalva and committee member Rep. Katie Porter are investigating an alleged bribery scheme in which they believe a real estate developer donated to a super PAC aligned in support of former President Donald Trump in exchange for pardons for two other men. The two Democrats wrote to Interior Secretary Deb Haaland on Friday, calling on her department to release all documents related to the pardons of Dwight and Steven Hammond, who had been convicted in 2012 of setting fires on public lands they had leased after illegally killing deer on the land. The two men were sentenced to five years in prison with time served in 2015, sparking right-wing protests including a 40-day armed occupation of Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon. Grijalva, Ariz., and Porter, Calif., believe real estate developer Mike Ingram—who was the subject of the Natural Resources Committee's first-ever criminal referral regarding another potential bribery case involving a clean water permit for one of his developments—secured the Hammonds' pardons in 2018 with a $10,000 donation to the America First Action, Inc. Super PAC. Click on the link for the full article Edited December 7, 2022 by China Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 On 12/5/2022 at 8:19 PM, China said: Giuliani pressed on role in Trump 2020 election reversal legal gambits during attorney discipline hearing Rudy Giuliani defended his work on former President Donald Trump’s 2020 election-reversal gambits as he testified Monday in attorney disciplinary proceedings in Washington, DC. Over the course of several hours of questioning by the chief lawyer in the DC Bar’s disciplinary office, Giuliani acknowledged he was now fuzzy on the election procedures in Pennsylvania – where he signed onto a lawsuit challenging Trump’s defeat that is at the heart of current attorney ethics charges – and he pushed back on the idea that the fraud allegations made in the lawsuit needed to be more specific. “You don’t start a lawsuit being able to prove – I mean, you’re very lucky when you do. You don’t start a lawsuit being able to prove, but being able to responsibly allege,” the former New York City mayor said. “I was responsibly alleging, based on the things that were told to me by other people. I wasn’t proving – I had a long way to go to prove.” The Board on Professional Responsibility is hearing testimony from Giuliani and other witnesses as it weighs whether the lawsuit he brought on behalf of Trump’s 2020 campaign put him in violation of attorney ethics rules. The disciplinary proceedings have a shape similar to a trial, with several witnesses including Giuliani testifying. The disciplinary process, which was launched by DC Disciplinary Counsel Hamilton Fox, has several more steps to go before final resolution. During Monday’s hearing, Fox grilled Giuliani on the logic of the Pennsylvania lawsuit, where the Trump campaign was seeking to throw out hundreds of thousands of mail ballots, and what evidence the Trump team had to support its mass fraud allegations. In one exchange, Fox pointed to an account referenced in the lawsuit about ballots being damaged by one Pennsylvania county’s ballot opening machines. He asked Giuliani what other evidence could be combined with that account to allege fraud. “Of course, I didn’t know that at the beginning of litigation. No lawyer would know that, Mr. Fox,” Giuliani said. “You find that out when you take discovery. You find that out when you when you ask further questions. I’m in this case for two days.” Click on the link for the full article ESCAPE ATTEMPT: Rudy Giuliani Asks For Sudden Break In Disciplinary Hearing After Being Confronted With Damaging Evidence On Tuesday, former Donald Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani asked for a sudden break after he was confronted with impeaching evidence in his disciplinary hearing. During the proceedings, D.C. disciplinary counsel Hamilton Fox grilled Giuliani about his work on the 2020 presidential election. A day earlier, Fox accused Giuliani of “weaponizing his law license” to bring a frivolous action in an attempt to undermine the Constitution.” At one point, Fox noted that the former mayor has tried to vindicate himself by pointing to a 2020 election case in Pennsylvania. “I agree that I cited the case,” Giuliani said. “For the proposition that in the future, if the ballots, the mail-in ballots were not dated, they wouldn’t be accepted?” Fox said. “OK, I mean, that’s what it says,” Giuliani said of his filing. “But that’s not what the case says, is it?” Fox said. “I don’t recall that,” Giuliani replied. At that point, Fox produced a copy of the case Giuliani cited. After an awkward moment of silence, Giuliani replied: “Could I take a short break?” Click on the link for more 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busch1724 Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 13 hours ago, China said: “Could I take a short break?” Click on the link for more I mean who doesn't have to piss when confronted with damaging news? Especially at that advanced age. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 I am reminded of the wise words of Cheech and Chong, although which album it came from I can't recall. "Bailiff, whack his pee-pee!" ~Bang 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 1 minute ago, Bang said: I am reminded of the wise words of Cheech and Chong, although which album it came from I can't recall. "Bailiff, whack his pee-pee!" ~Bang Tripping in Court! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 16 hours ago, China said: ESCAPE ATTEMPT: Rudy Giuliani Asks For Sudden Break In Disciplinary Hearing After Being Confronted With Damaging Evidence On Tuesday, former Donald Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani asked for a sudden break after he was confronted with impeaching evidence in his disciplinary hearing. During the proceedings, D.C. disciplinary counsel Hamilton Fox grilled Giuliani about his work on the 2020 presidential election. A day earlier, Fox accused Giuliani of “weaponizing his law license” to bring a frivolous action in an attempt to undermine the Constitution.” At one point, Fox noted that the former mayor has tried to vindicate himself by pointing to a 2020 election case in Pennsylvania. “I agree that I cited the case,” Giuliani said. “For the proposition that in the future, if the ballots, the mail-in ballots were not dated, they wouldn’t be accepted?” Fox said. “OK, I mean, that’s what it says,” Giuliani said of his filing. “But that’s not what the case says, is it?” Fox said. “I don’t recall that,” Giuliani replied. At that point, Fox produced a copy of the case Giuliani cited. After an awkward moment of silence, Giuliani replied: “Could I take a short break?” Click on the link for more Rudy's law license: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 4 hours ago, Busch1724 said: I mean who doesn't have to piss when confronted with damaging news? Especially at that advanced age. Based on his history of uncontrolled flatulence in court I'd say it was more likely a shart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ball Security Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 Inconceivable! This conversation Kanye West had with Wallace Shawn. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: Good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 And i'd bet they are also lying. They crayoned themselves into a corner. ~Bang 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now