Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

The Michael Cohen/Trump SDNY Investigation Thread


No Excuses

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LadySkinsFan said:

Granted. 

 

The probable cause must have been persuasive to overcome attorney client privilege. 

 

It hasn't overcome it at this point, it is tbd by a special master or taint team.

 

the probable cause was concern records could become unavailible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, twa said:

 

the probable cause was concern records could become unavailible

 

It takes a lot more than that, to get a federal judge to issue a warrant to seize client records, on an attorney representing a sitting POTUS. 

 

No doubt that was part of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Larry said:

 

It takes a lot more than that, to get a federal judge to issue a warrant to seize client records, on an attorney representing a sitting POTUS. 

 

No doubt that was part of it. 

 

I'd certainly hope so, especially since Cohen has been producing requested documents.

 

I'd hate to see a good prosecution thwarted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, twa said:

 

It hasn't overcome it at this point, it is tbd by a special master or taint team.

 

the probable cause was concern records could become unavailible

 

Not all the records probably contain elements of criminal activity. There must be something there, like the payment to Stormy Daniels might violate FEC laws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, twa said:

I'd certainly hope so, especially since Cohen has been producing requested documents.

Oh yeah, I’m sure he has ? He probably walked into Mueller’s office, set a folder labeled Россия сговор on his desk and was like, “Here you go! It’s all in here.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LadySkinsFan said:

 

Not all the records probably contain elements of criminal activity. There must be something there, like the payment to Stormy Daniels might violate FEC laws.

You know of course that he wrote that post from the same condescending and snarky tone that he views anything anti-Trump, right?

The comment on a “good prosecution tharted” is dripping with resentment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

Oh yeah, I’m sure he has ? He probably walked into Mueller’s office, set a folder labeled Россия сговор on his desk and was like, “Here you go! It’s all in here.”

 

 

[1.Goes to Google Translate.  2.Enters Россия сговор. 3.Sees Russia the Conspiracy. 4.Smiles.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

You know of course that he wrote that post from the same condescending and snarky tone that he views anything anti-Trump, right?

The comment on a “good prosecution tharted” is dripping with resentment.

 

Resentment at the incompetence,at this rate he might get two terms.

btw...If you are going to quote me at least spell it right :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, twa said:

 

I'd certainly hope so, especially since Cohen has been producing requested documents.

 

I'd hate to see a good prosecution thwarted.

 

Your vast legal experience is appreciated here, but I trust the Southern District of New York. They tend to hire fairly bright people. I'm surprised you have never worked there to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, skinsmarydu said:

?

They recited lots of precedent decisions too. I (back in the 90s) had opportunity to actually read further and found that they really tried to stick to making law apply to the story, or the other way around. First half was the evidence, second half was how to use it.

 

Most of the stuff they cited was pretty basic, but - by and large - they cited it accurately. I always assumed that the writers audited a 1L crim law class and an evidence calss, because they pull a lot of stuff from those particularly the legal clichés - indicting a ham sandwich, fruit of the poison tree, not letting that in through the back door when you couldn't get it in through the front, etc.

15 hours ago, twa said:

 

These crimes are determined w/o a trial?

 

Interesting concept.

 

THAT"S NOT HOW THIS WORKS!!! YOU DON'T KNOW HOW THIS WORKS!!!

 

Maybe you should learn how this works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Lombardi's_kid_brother said:

 

 

 

THAT"S NOT HOW THIS WORKS!!! YOU DON'T KNOW HOW THIS WORKS!!!

 

Maybe you should learn how this works.

 

Apparently it works slowly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...