• Blog Entries

    • By JimmiJo in ES Coverage
         0
      ES Coverage Cowboys vs Redskins 2019
       
      9/15/19
       
      Do I look like I'm playing? I'm not playing. This is the Washington Redskins versus the Dallas Cowboys. If you are a fan of this game, and this one does not get you excited you might want to check your pulse.
       
      Hello my friends it is I, JimmiJo, back for another year of this wonderful thing we call Redskins Football. This makes season 14 for me. I am joined by The Spaceman Spiff who will hereafter be known as "The Spaceman Spiff." 
       
      Where's that dude that gets the big tattoos on his back? There's his next one.
       
      So how important is this game? I don't know. What is the different between 1-1 and 0-2? The difference between batting .500 and zippy?
       
      Throw in that this is their 2nd division game to start the year AND a home game and you have a critical match.
       
      And once again they contend with critical injuries to start the year. Last year it was  their rookie star running back. This year its their 2nd year star...well you get the rest.  Darrius Guice is gone and not coming back this year. I think this really hurts him moving forward. Not sure who will build a scheme around him given his first two seasons.
       
      So it is down to the veteran Adrian Peterson. I have no worries of ring rust for hum. None whatsoever. He knows what to do.
       
      Anyway, almost time. Please share your thoughts.
       
      Stand by...
       
      Inactives
       
      The Redskins declared the following players as inactive:
      o   No. 12 QB Colt McCoy
      o   No. 23 CB Quinton Dunbar
      o   No. 31 Fabian Moreau
      o   No. 64 C Ross Pierschbacher
      o   No. 67 G Wes Martin
      o   No. 86 TE Jordan Reed
      o   No. 93 DT Jonathan Allen
       
      The Cowboys declared the following players as inactive:
      o   No. 10 WR Tavon Austin
      o   No. 37 S Donovan Wilson
      o   No. 57 LB Luke Gifford
      o   No. 61 C Adam Redmond
      o   No. 69 G Brandon Knight
      o   No. 79 DT Trysten Hill
      o   No. 97 DE Taco Charlton
       
      Follow along in-game at Twitter @Skinscast 
       
DC9

2018 Free Agency Database - (Signed: WILLIAMS - McPhee - Scandrick - P-Rich) - (Lauvao, Bergstrom, Nsehke, Taylor, Z. Brown and Quick re-signed)

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

Anyone on either side of the argument ever give thought to what this franchise has done wrong to have a roster that's not good enough to win, even without a top QB salary?

 

Sad stuff.

FO issues, ownership meddling, coaching issues, poor signings, bad ‘luck’ in the draft, trading away picks, mortgaging the future for a qb, cap penalty, etc.  

 

Bottom line, we’ve often suffered from a lack of vision/foresight, competence and stability (the good kind).  

 

Honestly, although Kirk has been a big part of our stable mediocrity (I mean that mostly in a good way), I found some reason for optimism about the rest of it the past several seasons.  Namely, 1) we were accumulating draft picks more often than we were trading them away, 2) we’ve had some decent success at drafting, 3) our bigger FA signings were smarter gambles - Jackson and Norman, 4) we had some stability in our scouting dept and at the head coach level.  

 

So, we seem to have improved in some of the areas I mentioned in the first two paragraphs, but the FO is an anchor for us.  We have more competent coaches, and perhaps better stability, but the foresight issue is rearing it’s ugly head in the form of this qb controversy.  

 

That’s my (overly simplistic?) take anyway.  

 

 

 

 

Edited by skinny21
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

@skinny21 I agree with you.  I recognize and acknowledge that things aren't as bad as they've been in the past.  There is just still a lot more to be desired is all.

Oh, I’m right there with you.  Frankly, if Cousins walks, and if we don’t find a (quick?) way to seriously mitigate that departure, that will be a failure that may well vault over the Haynesworth and Griffin debacles, as well as the Cerrato tenure, to number 1.  Which is depressing as hell.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

@skinny21 I agree with you.  I recognize and acknowledge that things aren't as bad as they've been in the past.  There is just still a lot more to be desired is all.

This is why im honestly ok with Kirk walking....

Yes he has been the best QB we have seen in a LONG time.  But what that is really saying is how BAD we have been at the position for a LONG time. 

Maybe this is better for a "Kirk" thread but I think what we do in free agency is heavily reliant on that outcome. 

 

Dont get me wrong, I like Kirk but I just feel like his time in DC is over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, NeverSurrender said:

This is why im honestly ok with Kirk walking....

Yes he has been the best QB we have seen in a LONG time.  But what that is really saying is how BAD we have been at the position for a LONG time. 

Maybe this is better for a "Kirk" thread but I think what we do in free agency is heavily reliant on that outcome. 

 

Dont get me wrong, I like Kirk but I just feel like his time in DC is over. 

I see it much differently and it's why I'm not okay with Kirk walking.

 

I have more faith this FO lucks out and puts together a few winning seasons, where perhaps we get hot and get lucky and make some noise in the postseason with Kirk than without him.

 

I do not trust this FO to build a winner sans a quarterback.  Why would I trust this FO to do so when they've had Kirk under their noses for 3 season and still can't take a dump or get off the pot.  As the great Doug Williams said, "the draft is a crapshoot".  Even the best talent evaluators have a hard time drafting franchise quarterbacks.  The chance that we draft and develop one that is whipping butt and taking names in the next few seasons?  Slim to none.  Even playing the game where they "build up the defense" and start a JAG sounds good but it's another thing to implement it.

 

The team has invested 3 seasons and over 44M in Kirk Cousins.  No other available QB in the NFL is going to come in and execute Jay's offense better than Kirk can.  Certainly not immediately.  I just don't see the point in flushing that down the toilet at this point in the game unless Kirk forces them to let him go.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree with your take NeverSurrender.  He wants to see his market value, we won't pay it.  Time to move on and build a great D for the next QB in town.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

Anyone on either side of the argument ever give thought to what this franchise has done wrong to have a roster that's not good enough to win, even without a top QB salary?

 

Sad stuff.

 

We haven't put two good drafts together.  In like... maybe ever?

 

When we do that, we have what is called a "Core" that we can build around.

 

We've tried.  We have a shot this year, which is why I'm all for just riding with Joe Schmo at QB and taking one next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, bobandweave said:

Great resigning. Way to go front office. Any leak on the terms yet?

2 years, base of $4mil per, could go as high as $7mil per is what i read. 

 

Correction - 2 years, $4mil base... incentives up to $7 total.

Edited by OVCChairman
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, OVCChairman said:

2 years, base of $4mil per, could go as high as $7mil per is what i read. 

Wow, that sounds like a lot to me, particular the incentives to earn up to 7.  In that case, perhaps they just made Brown worth 10M.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

Wow, that sounds like a lot to me, particular the incentives to earn up to 7.  In that case, perhaps they just made Brown worth 10M.

I'm wrong, I misread it.... 

 

 

Paul got the tweet

 

Edited by OVCChairman
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

Wow, that sounds like a lot to me, particular the incentives to earn up to 7.  In that case, perhaps they just made Brown worth 10M.

 

the way i read it, it's 4m over the 2 years.. so 2 per... + the incentives to reach 7 (3.5 per)

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great deal for a starting caliber run stopper.  That's a good deal for both parties. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

Phew, I was thinking the Redskins were trying to get into the business of igniting the ILB market like they have for a QB.

Yeah when I misread it and thought we were paying $4 mil base per, i thought for sure that meant we were taking Foster, and moving on from Brown.  At what he signed for... Brown is absolutely still an option.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Mason, it's a good signing, but all things considered, Zach Brown is what changed the LB core (when the starters were healthy).  He brought the extra speed, skill, and intangibles.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.