skinsfan66 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, actorguy1 said: Still worried about the spurned Suh suitors coming after Hankins That's a big treat for us. Looks like Suh maybe going to LA or Tenn., with Saints being the other. Tenn. has a lot of cap New Orleans not so much if he joins the Rams. But any player can be signed with the power of the pen as we Redskin fans are well a ware of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 I'm okay with Bruce not going overboard on Hankins. DL is a position you really want to get young in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carex Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 21 minutes ago, RWJ said: I'd like for us to trade out of the 1st round with AZ or Pitt (or a team in desperate need of a QB as Jackson or possibly another one of the other blue chippers MIGHT still be there and add more ammo to our draft in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. This draft is deep at CB, Interior DL as well as other positions we need, if we signed Hankins which would be like drafting a 1st or 2nd rounder. out of the first completely? It'd take a lot for me to be willing to do that. Like second third and fourth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander -JB- Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 2 hours ago, skinsmania123 said: But do we even know that offer on the table is? Allen is notorious for low balling as we know and Hankins agent is notorious for over inflating perceived value of the players he represents. I think you have to pay this guy upwards of 8 to 8.5 per to get him. We do not know what the Redskins might have offered him. We also know he is still a free agent. Nobody has given this guy what he wants. Why be the team that panics and overpays? I prefer to stick to an offer. No need to rush the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malapropismic Depository Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 13 minutes ago, Warhead36 said: I'm okay with Bruce not going overboard on Hankins. DL is a position you really want to get young in the draft. Yea, I'm guessing of all the average career-spans of NFL players, that position probably has the shortest, or it's up there, eh ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan66 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Warhead36 said: I'm okay with Bruce not going overboard on Hankins. DL is a position you really want to get young in the draft. I am just in the mindset that with someone who can command a double team so the linebackers can make the plays and push the pocket on passing downs to get the QB off his spot, is the top position of need for the team. Look at the top Defenses of the past, example ( Baltimore) Ray Lewis will tell you what it means to have the big guy upfront in a 3/4. We cannot stop the run and we need the pressure up the middle. Also we should end Free agency if we do not sign Hankins because there is nothing left out there to sign that would make a impact at a need position, save the money and cap space. No OL or RB out there worth going after and that leaves the draft to fill those needs, and the chances are lowered to fill them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Craig HoffmanVerified account @CraigHoffman 1m1 minute ago More Craig Hoffman Retweeted MindAfterMath Can’t tell you about Samaje, but people in the org have been raving about Anderson. Got to work immediately. Slimmed down. Much quicker. We’ll see how it translates come training camp and the season. Craig Hoffman added, MindAfterMath @MindAfterMath Hey @CraigHoffman, Gruden hinted yesterday that Anderson had slimmed down and gained speed? Can you tell me any more about this or if Perine may do something similar? 0 replies0 retweets0 likes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinking Skins Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan66 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 10 minutes ago, Malapropismic Depository said: Yea, I'm guessing of all the average career-spans of NFL players, that position probably has the shortest, or it's up there, eh ? Then that makes it that much harder to find a nose tackle. If you can get one with out using your first pick in the draft? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 43 minutes ago, carex said: out of the first completely? It'd take a lot for me to be willing to do that. Like second third and fourth Not out of the 1st round completely but trade out of #13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwo128 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 48 minutes ago, Warhead36 said: I'm okay with Bruce not going overboard on Hankins. DL is a position you really want to get young in the draft. Yea but when you can still get young dl in free agency it completely open the draft up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylorcooley1 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Anderson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 2 hours ago, goskins10 said: So we were both right but in the end the net is going to be more like $3.2M - so I stand corrected on that count. Unlike some I can admit when I am wrong. So fair enough @JSSkinz That's correct. But we also need to save space to eventually fill roster spots 52 and 53- about 1 mil. Plus to have a Practice Squad- 3.3 mil last year. And then space to fit whatever players are on IR or PUP to start the year, and for such moves during the season. When you said we had 6-8 mil, that's probably accurate before Scandrick. In terms of effective cap space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malapropismic Depository Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Taylorcooley1 said: Anderson? What's the question ? Or are you beckoning his attention ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Malapropismic Depository said: What's the question ? Or are you beckoning his attention ? Pretty sure he'd need to say his name three times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RemoveSnyder Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, Rufus T Firefly said: Pretty sure he'd need to say his name three times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HigSkin Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Romberjo said: I think you're right. (Maybe also crazy.) We do need to spend $6.5 million on rookies. But those signings bumps the 7 lowest-paid players off the bottom of our salary cap, at 480K apiece, so the marginal extra cost of signing the rookies (as opposed to the minimum salary players they replace on the salary cap) is $3.2 million, rather than what we'll actually spend on rookies, which is $6.5 million. This is correct. The actual slotting of the draft picks (based on what picks the team currently has) is over $6 million in salaries, but for cap purposes and based on the Rule of 51, it's likely less than $3 million against the actual cap. In fact, it's really only the first and second round picks that really put any dent on the actual cap (since the Redskins don't currently have a 3rd rounder) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Lets take our remaining cap space and start a highly sophisticated doping program. That is the best use of the money at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylorcooley1 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Sorry.. who is Anderson for 500 b...alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinking Skins Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, Taylorcooley1 said: Sorry.. who is Anderson for 500 b...alex Ryan Anderson,our second round linebacker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdaddy Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 13 minutes ago, Taylorcooley1 said: Sorry.. who is Anderson for 500 b...alex Ryan Anderson, LB, 2nd round pick for the Skins last year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dswerdlw Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Nose tackle Chunky Clements has been cut by the Houston Texans. I know nothing about him, but it's fun to say "Get Chunky." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinC Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 34 minutes ago, Jericho said: This is correct. The actual slotting of the draft picks (based on what picks the team currently has) is over $6 million in salaries, but for cap purposes and based on the Rule of 51, it's likely less than $3 million against the actual cap. In fact, it's really only the first and second round picks that really put any dent on the actual cap (since the Redskins don't currently have a 3rd rounder) Yep. I learned something today! Here is a link explaining it. https://overthecap.com/explaining-the-nfls-rookie-salary-cap/ So this means we have circa $13M of space available taking into account the rookies and an injury reserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 hour ago, dswerdlw said: Nose tackle Chunky Clements has been cut by the Houston Texans. I know nothing about him, but it's fun to say "Get Chunky." Bruce would accidentally sign someone named Smooth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.