Rdskns2000

Presidential Election:11/3/20- On to Iowa 2/3 & New Hampshire 2/11

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Forehead said:

 

 

I really shouldn't have wasted my time doing this, but I just had to.  Assuming a few potential data entry errors, I got an average of 57.69%.  I think Nonniey forgot to carry a 1 somewhere.

I think Forehead forgot to include every year the US was in existence (mea culpa I did forget to add the income tax that existed during the Civil War). Sure you can divide by 106 to get in the 57.69 range but the US is 243 years old not 106 . 

Edited by nonniey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, The Evil Genius said:

So with only 11 out of 106 years being less than what he claimed as the average for that period (and a good block of it being 2-3x higher)...yeah about that 25.42%

 

🤣

The US is 106 years old? Who knew?🤣

Edited by nonniey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, nonniey said:

The US is 106 years old? Who knew?🤣

 

Unless I'm mistaken, that chart you quoted had 106 years on it. But if you want to count the 137 or so years there wasn't a federal income tax permanently legalized to cheapen your argument, so be it. 

Edited by The Evil Genius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, The Evil Genius said:

 

Unless I'm mistaken, that chart you quoted had 106 years on it. ...... 

 

That's right it couldn't have posted the highest marginal income tax rates of earlier years because there weren't any.  (With the exception of the Civil War which I admit I forgot to add in my calculations).  And I said the average marginal tax rate "through US History" was 25+ %.

Edited by nonniey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, nonniey said:
 

That's right it couldn't have posted the highest marginal income tax rates of earlier years because there weren't any.  (With the exception of the Civil War which I admit I forgot to add in my calculations).  And I said the average marginal tax rate "through US History" was 25+ %.

 

So you willingly used 137 years of zeroes to make some asinine argument about an average over a 243 year period? 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, The Evil Genius said:

 

So you willingly used 137 years of zeroes to make some asinine argument about an average over a 243 year period? 

Yep.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

We don't need material wealth because the love of God is the only wealth we need. Dude should donate all his money since it's only temporary.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FFS.....I thought the "They say it's Free, but....."  line was the stupidest commentary against Single Payer.....along comes Duck Dynasty guy to tell us about God's free healthcare plan.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said:

FOH with this. There's a list of people to blame and Trump is right at number one.

 

Beto signaling his lane in the Democratic primary.  He'll run as a "uniter" just like he did in Texas.  He'll be the young guy without much baggage in the same lane as Joe Biden.  Not a terrible place to be.  

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Evil Genius said:

 

So you willingly used 137 years of zeroes to make some asinine argument about an average over a 243 year period? 

 

Honestly, it’s probably the strongest, most factually transparent argument he’s been able to offer in his time here.  We’ve clearly had a positive effect on him.  

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, The Evil Genius said:

 

So you willingly used 137 years of zeroes to make some asinine argument about an average over a 243 year period? 

 

Imagine thinking this is clever.  

 

Image result for so clever gif

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, tshile said:

Yay! This means we’re done with hearing from Warren now right?

 

Dont hold your native american breath playa lol

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, PleaseBlitz said:

 

Beto signaling his lane in the Democratic primary.  He'll run as a "uniter" just like he did in Texas.  He'll be the young guy without much baggage in the same lane as Joe Biden.  Not a terrible place to be.  

 

 

Booker is trying for that lane too, but.. meh. Never understood his appeal. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.