• Blog Entries

    • By TK in ES Coverage
         4
      The Redskins have opened their 2019 season with two losses. Both against Divisional foes. Now they get to close out Week 3 at home on Monday Night against the visiting 1-1 Chicago Bears. The Bears don't have much of an offense but seem to have what may be an elite defense.
       
      On the flip side, the Redskins have a developing passing attack and a disastrous defense. The Redskins haven't had a Defense this vanilla since Mike Nolan received his ice cream. Oh, and the Redskins already have more guys on IR then any other team this season. 
       
      Will the Redskins finally put one in the win column? 
       
      As usual, poll closes at kickoff. Go vote!
Rdskns2000

Presidential Election 2020 - Baby Sharpie vs Batwoman or Batman

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PleaseBlitz said:

 

Okay good. :)  

 

So does that mean you aren't a Bernie person?

I’ve given money to Warren. If Bernie wins, and tbf he has the highest floor of anyone, I’d be happy too. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

I’ve given money to Warren. If Bernie wins, and tbf he has the highest floor of anyone, I’d be happy too. 

 

Agree that Bernie has the highest floor given his weird cult of personality from 2016.  I don't think anyone's floor has any bearing on anything though.  Right now it looks like it's Biden's to lose.  I think Biden certainly has the potential to **** it up, but his flip flop this week shows that he's got people that will help him not get bogged down with fights over discrete issues, which I think is very smart, tactically, for him. 

 

Not that anyone asked, but at this point, in June 2019, I'm looking forward to seeing it play out via debates and other public interactions.  At this point, I'd enthusiastically vote for about half a dozen candidates and have given money to 3.  If Bernie wins the nomination, I'm gonna have to vote very drunk (assuming Trump is still in office).

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, PleaseBlitz said:

I don't think anyone's floor has any bearing on anything though.

Disagree completely 

 

thats how Trump won the Republican primary in 2016 and why Republicans are scared of acting against him now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, goskins10 said:

I expect to see someone like Mayor Pete, Andrew Yang, Tulsi Gabbard or someone like them to emerge. Maybe even a Jay Inslee or Kirsten Gillenbrand.

 

 

Mayor Pete is the only one you listed, who could get the nomination but he's doing very poor with minorities; so doubtful.   Andrew Yang is going no where.  Tulsi is nut and not going anywhere.   Jay is just a single issue candidate.   Kirsten isn't going anywhere.

 

If the nominee isn't Biden or Sanders; then it will probably be Lizzie, Mayor Pete, Kamala or Beto. 

 

Those minor candidates have to really have a good showing at the June and July debates or they will have to start dropping out.  Could someone break out, yeah.  I don't see who it will be though.

Edited by Rdskns2000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Rdskns2000 said:

 

Mayor Pete is the only one you listed, who could get the nomination but he's doing very poor with minorities; so doubtful.   Andrew Yang is going no where.  Tulsi is nut and not going anywhere.   Jay is just a single issue candidate.   Kirsten isn't going anywhere.

 

If the nominee isn't Biden or Sanders; then it will probably be Lizzie, Mayor Pete, Kamala or Beto. 

 

Those minor candidates have to really have a good showing at the June and July debates or they will have to start dropping out.  Could someone break out, yeah.  I don't see who it will be though.

 

 

I am going to guess you either ignored or skipped this part of my comment. 

 

image.thumb.png.5fb9863bbaba2c38fc25944fe4124f0b.png

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only in America would a voter look at Trump vs. Warren and decide over the DNA results.  Considering the entire context of that, versus Trump being pretty much a straight up liar about everything.   Some people are going to vote for Trump on issues, whatever, they won't be swayed, however the so-called middle of the road/independent voters, if they legitimately would vote for Trump over Warren based on that native american thing, then that spells trouble for any candidate ever not named Trump since Trump is the one candidate that seems to be immune from paying any kind of price for consistently lying to people's faces.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

I have no idea why Beto is running for President and he doesn’t seem to know either.

 

Assume that for most of them, it's a case of 

 

a)  Who knows, there's a slim chance I might win.  

b)  And even if I don't, I'll vastly improve my name recognition, for a lesser job.  

 

I mean, there's a power vacuum in the Dem Party right now.  Hillary spent the last 8 years crystallizing everything around herself, so there's no real clear bench  ready to step up.  The Dem Party has a starter who just got benched, no second string, and 53 UDFAs.  The chance for a lucky UDFA walking out on the field isn't bad.  

 

And then, the lucky winner gets to go against Trump.  Who in many ways ought to be the weakest incumbent Pres, at least since WW2.  

 

Normally, the chance for somebody to go from Mayor or some such to President would be a joke.  But in this situation?  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

I have no idea why Beto is running for President and he doesn’t seem to know either.

 

he believed the press from his earlier run ,too bad for him they have shifted the love to Buttjug.

 

Image result for jilted beto

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We still going on about identity politics when you have Republicans literally trying to rig the census to benefit white Republicans. Major **** out of here with that.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said:

We still going on about identity politics when you have Republicans literally trying to rig the census to benefit white Republicans. Major **** out of here with that.

Only white identity matters

 

We had hundreds of articles about the white working class voter after the 2016 elections, yet we can’t talk about identity politics. It’s nonsense.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point, with this field, I really think that polling is almost entirely based on name recognition, and the big challenge the candidates have to to is to fight over air time.  

 

(I also think that that's why it's way too early to pronounce Biden as The Only One.  A lot of his numbers, I bet, is simply because a lot of people have heard of him, and don;t have a clue what the other 23 candidates have to say. )

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hickenlooper is running a strong 1992 campaign 🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.