PleaseBlitz Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 My law firm literally just sent out an tutorial on how to properly redact text in legal filings using the Manafort case as an example of how to **** it up. I'm dying. 2 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 My only redaction based story was one time we got a police report pdf and were able to click on and move the black bars, revealing some names. I was like "uhhhhhhhhh...pretty sure I'm not supposed to be able to do that.." 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: My only redaction based story was one time we got a police report pdf and were able to click on and move the black bars, revealing some names. I was like "uhhhhhhhhh...pretty sure I'm not supposed to be able to do that.." I was interviewing a 3L that wanted a job here and their writing sample had some redactions that were done wrong and thus removable. So I brought up the name of the company that was supposed to be redacted during the interview to see how they'd react. She was mortified. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
techboy Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 1 hour ago, PleaseBlitz said: I was interviewing a 3L that wanted a job here and their writing sample had some redactions that were done wrong and thus removable. So I brought up the name of the company that was supposed to be redacted during the interview to see how they'd react. She was mortified. Is this another example of a failed redaction (of the gender of the 3L)? Shouldn't it be "they" were mortified? Are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 10 minutes ago, techboy said: Is this another example of a failed redaction (of the gender of the 3L)? Shouldn't it be "they" were mortified? Are you? No. And no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 (edited) 🤔 Edited January 12, 2019 by Cooked Crack 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 i dont know how you sweep this under the rug, but it will be done regardless 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 9 minutes ago, BRAVEONAWARPATH said: How much more evidence do they need? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 Yeah, the FBI does not open counterintelligence investigations into a sitting POTUS lightly. Just like federal judges don't issue warrants to raid an office of an attorney, to seize client records, when the client is a sitting POTUS, just on a joke, either. Or FBI directors documenting their interactions with a sitting POTUS, and then distributing the notes, for that matter. 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chachie Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 38 minutes ago, Larry said: Yeah, the FBI does not open counterintelligence investigations into a sitting POTUS lightly. Just like federal judges don't issue warrants to raid an office of an attorney, to seize client records, when the client is a sitting POTUS, just on a joke, either. Or FBI directors documenting their interactions with a sitting POTUS, and then distributing the notes, for that matter. We have a Kremlin agent in the White House. Straight-up, flat-out, and hiding in plain sight. Our collective sub-conscience has known this since the callout for "her emails" but the clouds of disbelief and the necessity of the FBI to investigate slowly have delayed the conscious awakening. 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forehead Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 22 hours ago, DogofWar1 said: My only redaction based story was one time we got a police report pdf and were able to click on and move the black bars, revealing some names. I was like "uhhhhhhhhh...pretty sure I'm not supposed to be able to do that.." That's pretty sad. Adobe has all the tools you need in one spot to do it correctly. What were they doing, just putting shapes on top? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 17 minutes ago, Forehead said: That's pretty sad. Adobe has all the tools you need in one spot to do it correctly. What were they doing, just putting shapes on top? It’s a 6 step process for the redactions to be permanent. If you stop after steps 2-5, the redactions will be there, but can be removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forehead Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 5 hours ago, PleaseBlitz said: It’s a 6 step process for the redactions to be permanent. If you stop after steps 2-5, the redactions will be there, but can be removed. What program are you guys using, if you don't mind me asking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 53 minutes ago, Forehead said: What program are you guys using, if you don't mind me asking? Nuance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 THIS SEEMS NORMAL https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-concealed-details-of-his-face-to-face-encounters-with-putin-from-senior-officials-in-administration/2019/01/12/65f6686c-1434-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.html?utm_term=.d9c98c6b23ce Like, lul, the libs and there Trump Deragnment Sindrome. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 Trump is a straight up traitor, and I hope that House hearings and investigations expose him to the max. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 Trump is a traitor. It’s out in the open. How many other traitors are currently in the GOP? We will find out when the Mueller report comes out. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isifhan Posted January 12, 2019 Share Posted January 12, 2019 on at least one occasion taking possession of the notes of his own interpreter and instructing the linguist not to discuss what had transpired with other administration officials, current and former U.S. officials said. This interpreter needs to be in front of congress asap. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 The closer we get to the end of Muellers investigation, it is being leaked to the media that Trump is under investigation for being a Kremlin stooge and that he goes out of his way to conceal his communications with Putin who directed an intelligence operation to help Trump get elected. I think it’s obvious where this is headed. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted January 13, 2019 Share Posted January 13, 2019 15 minutes ago, No Excuses said: I think it’s obvious where this is headed. Four more years? 1 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now