visionary Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 3 hours ago, The Evil Genius said: Maybe there needs to be amendment to add a process for a presidential recall via public vote? We'll call it the Drumpfster Fire Amendment. Got borscht? Especially when the popular vote keeps getting it right while the electoral college screws up. We've now seen that twice with Bush and almost certainly Trump. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 (edited) Get everyone under oath. We know what happens when public officials lie under oath (42). Start holding Republicans' feet to the fire. Edited February 15, 2017 by LadySkinsFan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 For the sake of fun... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar78 Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Burgold said: Especially when the popular vote keeps getting it right while the electoral college screws up. We've now seen that twice with Bush and almost certainly Trump. Only because the popular vote swing our way. I'd be careful of what we wish for. There are a lot of people that don't vote because they live in the "wrong" State for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSSkinz Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 2 minutes ago, Elessar78 said: There are a lot of people that don't vote because they live in the "wrong" State for them. Thats a crock, if you don't vote its because you didn't get off your lazy ass. Is there any real data to back up your statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted February 16, 2017 Author Share Posted February 16, 2017 sen. risch (r--idaho---senior intel committee mem) just gave (imo) a very reassuring and frank (still properly cautious/responsible) interview that the senate committee is very much agreed to pursue this with vigor and they "are very good at what we do and we will get the answers" 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, Jumbo said: sen. risch (r--idaho---senior intel committee mem) just gave (imo) a very reassuring and frank (still properly cautious/responsible) interview that the senate committee is very much agreed to pursue this with vigor and they "are very good at what we do and we will get the answers" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 5 minutes ago, twa said: You can't handle the truth You know that guy in the movie was arrested for his actions, right? The system *can* still work. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSSkinz Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 I'm curious if the WH can go after the Post and the Times and make them give up their source within the Government? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinz4Life12 Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 This cat and mouse game sucks. I just want the truth already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, jschuck12001 said: I'm curious if the WH can go after the Post and the Times and make them give up their source within the Government? #Deepthroat 13 minutes ago, visionary said: Flynn truthful Well there you have it folks no need to look further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Well, certainly they ca't handle the truth, twa. Heck, they can hardly handle the alternative facts they themselves manufacture. 40 minutes ago, Jumbo said: sen. risch (r--idaho---senior intel committee mem) just gave (imo) a very reassuring and frank (still properly cautious/responsible) interview that the senate committee is very much agreed to pursue this with vigor and they "are very good at what we do and we will get the answers" I appreciate that he says he's going to investigate with "vigor," but I'll believes it when I sees it... and if heads roll because of it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 13 minutes ago, jschuck12001 said: I'm curious if the WH can go after the Post and the Times and make them give up their source within the Government? Yes and not a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switchgear Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 4 hours ago, Dan T. said: By the way, don't you just love Hannity and his ilk bemoaning not the content of the released information, but those who may or may not be releasing it? When just a few short months ago they were hailing Julian Assange and WikiLeaks as a paragon of truth-telling. And that includes Donald ****ing Tweet-Monkey Trump 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 35 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: You know that guy in the movie was arrested for his actions, right? The system *can* still work. They arrested Jack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 It's Enrico Palazzo! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar78 Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, jschuck12001 said: Thats a crock, if you don't vote its because you didn't get off your lazy ass. Is there any real data to back up your statement? Where's your data? edit: here's mine... there are about 231M who are eligible to vote. Eligible, not just registered. About 130M voted in 2016. Edited February 16, 2017 by Elessar78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) Quote The possible role for Stephen A. Feinberg, a co-founder of Cerberus Capital Management, has met fierce resistance among intelligence officials already on edge because of the criticism the intelligence community has received from Mr. Trump during the campaign and since he became president. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump blamed leaks from the intelligence community for the departure of Michael T. Flynn, his national security adviser, whose resignation he requested. There has been no announcement of Mr. Feinberg’s job, which would be based in the White House, but he recently told his company’s shareholders that he is in discussions to join the Trump administration. He is a member of Mr. Trump’s economic advisory council. Mr. Feinberg, who has close ties to Stephen K. Bannon, who is Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, and Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, declined to comment on his possible position. The White House, which is still working out the details of the intelligence review, also would not comment. Edited February 16, 2017 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 26 minutes ago, visionary said: From what I understand, (and granted, my knowledge comes from reading Tom Clancey books), people in positions like President of DCIA are actually asked whether they want to know sources. Under the theory that you can't accidentally give up something you don't know. And that at least some of them choose not to be told. No clue if it's true. But it sure would make sense, to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now