Jumbo

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Recommended Posts

ah, seeing nunes on fox yesterday...the gross blatant lying and spinning with laura ingraham...what a piece of human detritus

 

i suggest a tour of the kennels

 

 

ramsay.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By "pull us apart", Putin means "oppose my army's attempts to conquer".  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In short, the court of appeals has ruled that any current of former executive employee may completely ignore any congressional oversight.  And Congress' sole remedy is to shut down the government, or to impeach federal officers (without any evidence, since it's being denied.)  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Larry said:

In short, the court of appeals has ruled that any current of former executive employee may completely ignore any congressional oversight.  And Congress' sole remedy is to shut down the government, or to impeach federal officers (without any evidence, since it's being denied.)  

 

 

Don't forget, also listed, is citing them for contempt of Congress.  From Wiki:  

 

Quote

Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment, imprisonment for coercion, or release from the contempt citation).

 

I suggest they start arresting people and bringing them before Congress, and if they're uncooperative, jail them.  They want to play games, time to get serious.

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I don’t really understand what the Legislative is doing asking the Judicial to join the fray by making a legal decision.  The shame!!

 

1 hour ago, China said:

suggest they start arresting people and bringing them before Congress, and if they're uncooperative, jail them.  They want to play games, time to get serious.

Democrats don’t have the testicular fortitude for that.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, TheGreatBuzz said:

Democrats don’t have the testicular fortitude for that.

 

Yeah.  It couldn't possibly derive from not having the firepower to effect such a thing.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Larry said:

 

Yeah.  It couldn't possibly derive from not having the firepower to effect such a thing.  

 

They do in the House.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheGreatBuzz said:

They do in the House.  

 

The House has the law enforcement ability to go out in the world, grab people off the street (including current government officials), physically drag them to Capitol Hill, and detain them?  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Larry said:

 

The House has the law enforcement ability to go out in the world, grab people off the street (including current government officials), physically drag them to Capitol Hill, and detain them?  

 

My understanding is exactly where they can go in carrying out their duties has never really been tested.  For example, they can *paraphrasing* force a Congressperson to come to work when they refuse to.  Even if you say they can’t leave the Capitol grounds to carry out their duties, I’m sure there can be some creative ways to make things happen.  But again, the Dems don’t have the stones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^Can we get the same judge to rule the same way for White House Occupant based on his written answers to Mueller's questions?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

 

1 hour ago, EmirOfShmo said:

^^Can we get the same judge to rule the same way for White House Occupant based on his written answers to Mueller's questions?


not the same judge, but if you ask enough times your likely to find someone who can be bought.

Edited by CousinsCowgirl84

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillary testified for 11 hours, under oath, before Congress. This is taking this email crap to the extreme given that Trump's own children serving as his advisors use unsecured phones, including Trump himself. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.