Jumbo

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Recommended Posts

Will Hurd trying to seem like a serious person. That ship sailed after asking Schiff to resign with all the other stooges.

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said:

Will Hurd trying to seem like a serious person. That ship sailed after asking Schiff to resign with all the other stooges.

The call for Schiff to resign was late March (28th). The release of the heavily redacted Muller Report was almost month later. 

 

He might be regretting swallowing the party line and wanting to make amends.  Most likely not, but one must start somewhere. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by visionary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking more along the lines of next fiscal year's budget stating that no federal agency will receive funding it it is refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena.  

 

Including the Presidential travel budget.  

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

$25,000 per day will definitely **** over many Trump underlings but it won't be **** to Mnuchin. Does the House have the ability to freeze assets to force compliance with subpoenas? THAT would trigger that little weasel. Or at the very least it would trigger his trophy wife.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

 

House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) laid out the case for contempt. He raised three often repeated complaints against Barr in that he failed to release an unredacted report by special counsel Robert Mueller, allegedly lied twice to Congress, and refused to appear before the committee. Yet, notably, the only claim the committee seeks to put before a federal court is the redaction of the report. That seems rather curious since, if Barr lied or refused a subpoena as House leaders claim, it normally would be an easy case of contempt. The reason for this move is that House Democrats know both claims would not withstand even a cursory judicial review.

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/442732-democrats-showing-contempt-by-holding-william-barr-in-contempt

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid he'll get arrested, as he should if he conspires with a foreign country to interfere in our elections. 

 

Need to make this law stronger with harsher penalties.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, twa said:

If he was not Potus Republican

 

FTFY

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Larry said:

 

FTFY

 

 that is stopping the Dem house?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.