redskinss Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, Llevron said: We knew this was going to happen at the start....the numbness. It was an inevitability. Much like Thanos. And like Thanos we need to cut off the ****ers head to be rid of him. All the ways I would have predicted that movie gets spoiled for me a trump thread might have been the Last. Lol. But yeah I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 1 minute ago, redskinss said: All the ways I would have predicted that movie gets spoiled for me a trump thread might have been the Last. Lol. But yeah I agree. You're really going to be surprised that Pepper Potts was the one who delivered the blow. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Tell that **** to McConnell when he interfered with Obama's administration and executive duties. Really, the sheer nerve of this asshole. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Add qualifications? So if we get his taxes he's no longer qualified? Not a lawyer but that sounds dumb AF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 25 minutes ago, redskinss said: All the ways I would have predicted that movie gets spoiled for me a trump thread might have been the Last. Lol. But yeah I agree. If you watch it and remember this you wont see it as a spoiler. I wouldnt do you like that. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Mueller must have something good on Trump Jr in order for the republicans to compel him to testify (so that he can reject the house later). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 9 hours ago, visionary said: I'm pretty sure that they all know that their legal case against this stuff is complete bull****. They're just hoping to run out the clock in the courts. They'll stall it for as long as they can. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOF44 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Never thought I'd see the day, but if the courts ultimately side with Trump we will have ourselves a good ole authoritarian regime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chachie Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 14 minutes ago, HOF44 said: Never thought I'd see the day, but if the courts ultimately side with Trump we will have ourselves a good ole authoritarian regime. The irony of the republican congress and it's voters is tragic. Freedom, capitalism? Nope. FASCISM. Goodbye, USA. It was nice to be a part of it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) 16 minutes ago, HOF44 said: Never thought I'd see the day, but if the courts ultimately side with Trump we will have ourselves a good ole authoritarian regime. All hail King trump. A sad time to be an American. As I said when Meuller found little to use. Goodbye America, welcome to trumpica. Edited May 9, 2019 by Skintime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 18 minutes ago, HOF44 said: Never thought I'd see the day, but if the courts ultimately side with Trump we will have ourselves a good ole authoritarian regime. They most likely will on the taxes and the overly broad mueller report request. the latter they will likely just tell them to negotiate . Both would be the historical norm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 1 minute ago, twa said: Both would be the historical norm I’ll give you a million dollars if you provide examples of those being the historical norms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: I’ll give you a million dollars if you provide examples of those being the historical norms. I don't believe you. The tax request is too narrowly focused for legislative and oversight request norms. The Mueller request clearly is asking for things protected by law and recent court rulings. Send me a deposit and I'll cite cases Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 27 minutes ago, twa said: The tax request is too narrowly focused for legislative and oversight request norms. Really? Too narrow? I'd bet the Dems would be happy to demand more of his financials, if you'd like. Would, say, audited financials on every Trump business, including the identities of any major "customers", beginning when he declared for office? Or I suppose they could simply follow the precedent the Republicans have used on the last two Dem Presidents, and announce that they intend to demand "everything". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Larry said: Really? Too narrow? Plus, you'd think a "narrow focus" is a good thing as opposed to broad reasoning of just wanting to see them for the sake of who knows what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 This press conference he is giving is wild Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, twa said: I don't believe you. The tax request is too narrowly focused for legislative and oversight request norms. The Mueller request clearly is asking for things protected by law and recent court rulings. Send me a deposit and I'll cite cases I propose we allow our fellow ES members to decide who is right and then agree to abide by their decision. Of course, most of them don’t affiliate with the same political party as you so I’m confident they’ll correctly rule in my favor and force you to pay the million dollars that you promised. However, if you are somehow able to present absolutely irrefutable evidence of your claim, they understand that what I actually said was that I’d give you a million doll hairs... damn autocorrect got me. Edited May 9, 2019 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Hes crazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busch1724 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 32 minutes ago, visionary said: I'm curious as to what Rand's purpose was for this tweet? Was there sarcasm or a slight break in the ranks? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Busch1724 said: I'm curious as to what Rand's purpose was for this tweet? Was there sarcasm or a slight break in the ranks? To be vauge so both sides can interpret it differently. Edited May 9, 2019 by Cooked Crack 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 20 minutes ago, Llevron said: This press conference he is giving is wild Who? What's going on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, twa said: They most likely will on the taxes and the overly broad mueller report request. the latter they will likely just tell them to negotiate . Both would be the historical norm Please stop trying to pretend that anything that is happening here is in any way a historical norm. It's just not true. Add: It seems now Trump has started hedging a bit on his exoneration claims. He's now apparently saying "no collusion and essentially no obstruction." Edited May 9, 2019 by mistertim 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now