Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?


Jumbo

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, visionary said:

 

 

SThis is the guy who's tough on crime and supports law enforcement.

 

dear GOP member..  aside from literally being one of the dumbest, most gullible jackasses to come along in decades, you literally worship a man who espouses everything you hate.

 

What the **** is the matter with you?

 

~Bang

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bang said:

 

SThis is the guy who's tough on crime and supports law enforcement.

 

dear GOP member..  aside from literally being one of the dumbest, most gullible jackasses to come along in decades, you literally worship a man who espouses everything you hate.

 

What the **** is the matter with you?

 

~Bang

 

 

 

 

It’s projection. All of it is projection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, twa said:

Many of them should yield their time to someone with a brain.....and their office. 

 

Remember this episode from American history?

 

Senate Republicans chose Arizona sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell to handle their questioning in Thursday’s hearing into Christine Blasey Ford’s allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her. Presumably they thought a professional prosecutor might help cast doubt on Ford’s testimony. If that was their hope, they must be gravely disappointed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Llevron said:

 

Yet you voted for the lowest IQ to ever run a race. How TWA of you 

 

What is his IQ?

 

 

 

If she truly believes that will she impeach him?????.....or make more excuses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dan T. said:

 

Remember this episode from American history?

 

 

I certainly remember, and the context.....that someone as fragile as her should be questioned by someone experienced with sexual assault victims.

 

And of course cause they were afraid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, twa said:

Just in case you were wondering

 

I see we're still pushing the "well, I know obstructing justice is a crime, but firing the head of the FBI for the purpose of obstructing justice isn't illegal, because firing the head of the FBI is legal when it's not to obstruct justice" talking point.  

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, twa said:

 

What is his IQ?

 

 

One would assume a few points higher than yours 😎

 

(I kid. I know you are smartishkinda, just republican) 

3 minutes ago, @SkinsGoldPants said:

Get bent, Wallace. You work there too.

 

Hes been trying to call Fox out for like a year now though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, twa said:

I certainly remember, and the context.....that someone as fragile as her should be questioned by someone experienced with sexual assault victims.

 

Says the guy who is also claiming that allowing the Attorney General to be questioned by actual attorneys was "something they knew would be unacceptable", and therefore justifies the witness running and hiding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Llevron said:

 

One would assume a few points higher than yours 😎

 

(I kid. I know you are smartishkinda, just republican) 

 

 

 

Mine was higher than Hillary's.....of course we both have been hitting the sauce pretty hard .....soooooo.

1 minute ago, TryTheBeal! said:

 

His list of expertise is borderline infinite.

 

Yet I had to ask what hallway sex is.....we all got our weaknesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, twa said:

 

I certainly remember, and the context.....that someone as fragile as her should be questioned by someone experienced with sexual assault victims.

 

And of course cause they were afraid. 

 

 

Tell that to the GOP clowns declaring that it's unprecedented for a witness to be questioned by staff instead of members.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Larry said:

 

Says the guy who is also claiming that allowing the Attorney General to be questioned by actual attorneys was "something they knew would be unacceptable", and therefore justifies the witness running and hiding.  

 

He told them in advance it was, and they also knew the document request was beyond what he would/could legally provide.

 

Ball is in their court, will they shoot ,dribble, or just make more funny noises.

 

 

1 minute ago, Dan T. said:

 

 

Tell that to the GOP clowns declaring that it's unprecedented for a witness to be questioned by staff instead of members.

 

Barr says it is not fitting for a cabinet official at this point.

 

He might know more about propriety. :pint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, twa said:

He told them in advance it was, and they also knew the document request was beyond what he would/could legally provide.

 

It's their fault, I tell you!  They failed to comply with the designated stonewaller's advance demands!  And they actually asked for things that they know he would refuse to hand over!  That makes it their fault. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, twa said:

If she truly believes that will she impeach him?????.....or make more excuses?

 

She should start impeachment investigation into Mueller and Trump right away.  I've been against weaponizing impeachment for political purposes for a long time now, but this is now a matter of principle.

 

1 hour ago, twa said:

Barr says it is not fitting for a cabinet official at this point.

 

He might know more about propriety. :pint:

 

All evidence to the contrary 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...