Jumbo

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, visionary said:

 

 

SThis is the guy who's tough on crime and supports law enforcement.

 

dear GOP member..  aside from literally being one of the dumbest, most gullible jackasses to come along in decades, you literally worship a man who espouses everything you hate.

 

What the **** is the matter with you?

 

~Bang

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bang said:

 

SThis is the guy who's tough on crime and supports law enforcement.

 

dear GOP member..  aside from literally being one of the dumbest, most gullible jackasses to come along in decades, you literally worship a man who espouses everything you hate.

 

What the **** is the matter with you?

 

~Bang

 

 

 

 

It’s projection. All of it is projection. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many of them should yield their time to someone with a brain.....and their office. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, twa said:

Many of them should yield their time to someone with a brain.....and their office. 

 

Remember this episode from American history?

 

Senate Republicans chose Arizona sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell to handle their questioning in Thursday’s hearing into Christine Blasey Ford’s allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her. Presumably they thought a professional prosecutor might help cast doubt on Ford’s testimony. If that was their hope, they must be gravely disappointed.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, twa said:

Many of them should yield their time to someone with a brain.....and their office. 

 

Yet you voted for the lowest IQ to ever run a race. How TWA of you 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Llevron said:

 

Yet you voted for the lowest IQ to ever run a race. How TWA of you 

 

What is his IQ?

 

 

 

If she truly believes that will she impeach him?????.....or make more excuses?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dan T. said:

 

Remember this episode from American history?

 

 

I certainly remember, and the context.....that someone as fragile as her should be questioned by someone experienced with sexual assault victims.

 

And of course cause they were afraid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, twa said:

Just in case you were wondering

 

I see we're still pushing the "well, I know obstructing justice is a crime, but firing the head of the FBI for the purpose of obstructing justice isn't illegal, because firing the head of the FBI is legal when it's not to obstruct justice" talking point.  

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, twa said:

 

What is his IQ?

 

 

One would assume a few points higher than yours 😎

 

(I kid. I know you are smartishkinda, just republican) 

3 minutes ago, @SkinsGoldPants said:

Get bent, Wallace. You work there too.

 

Hes been trying to call Fox out for like a year now though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, twa said:

I certainly remember, and the context.....that someone as fragile as her should be questioned by someone experienced with sexual assault victims.

 

Says the guy who is also claiming that allowing the Attorney General to be questioned by actual attorneys was "something they knew would be unacceptable", and therefore justifies the witness running and hiding.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Llevron said:

 

 

(I kid. I know you are smartishkinda, just republican) 

 

 

His list of expertise is borderline infinite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Llevron said:

 

One would assume a few points higher than yours 😎

 

(I kid. I know you are smartishkinda, just republican) 

 

 

 

Mine was higher than Hillary's.....of course we both have been hitting the sauce pretty hard .....soooooo.

1 minute ago, TryTheBeal! said:

 

His list of expertise is borderline infinite.

 

Yet I had to ask what hallway sex is.....we all got our weaknesses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, twa said:

 

I certainly remember, and the context.....that someone as fragile as her should be questioned by someone experienced with sexual assault victims.

 

And of course cause they were afraid. 

 

 

Tell that to the GOP clowns declaring that it's unprecedented for a witness to be questioned by staff instead of members.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Larry said:

 

Says the guy who is also claiming that allowing the Attorney General to be questioned by actual attorneys was "something they knew would be unacceptable", and therefore justifies the witness running and hiding.  

 

He told them in advance it was, and they also knew the document request was beyond what he would/could legally provide.

 

Ball is in their court, will they shoot ,dribble, or just make more funny noises.

 

 

1 minute ago, Dan T. said:

 

 

Tell that to the GOP clowns declaring that it's unprecedented for a witness to be questioned by staff instead of members.

 

Barr says it is not fitting for a cabinet official at this point.

 

He might know more about propriety. :pint:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, @SkinsGoldPants said:

Get bent, Wallace. You work there too.

 

Announcing to an empty stadium that the food being served during the main event is indeed poisoned.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, twa said:

He told them in advance it was, and they also knew the document request was beyond what he would/could legally provide.

 

It's their fault, I tell you!  They failed to comply with the designated stonewaller's advance demands!  And they actually asked for things that they know he would refuse to hand over!  That makes it their fault. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Llevron said:

 

 

Hes been trying to call Fox out for like a year now though. 

 

Then Wallace needs to be more direct and just say it. Of course, he might lose his gig.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, twa said:

If she truly believes that will she impeach him?????.....or make more excuses?

 

She should start impeachment investigation into Mueller and Trump right away.  I've been against weaponizing impeachment for political purposes for a long time now, but this is now a matter of principle.

 

1 hour ago, twa said:

Barr says it is not fitting for a cabinet official at this point.

 

He might know more about propriety. :pint:

 

All evidence to the contrary 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bearrock said:

 

She should

 

Certainly, or shut her trap.......be a win either way to me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, twa said:

 

Certainly, or shut her trap.......be a win either way to me

 

Come on twa, be honest.  You want both don't ya? 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.