visionary Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 (edited) ~Bang 1 hour ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said: Dems should fight harder. Don’t blame other people for loosing. Absolutely disgusting. the differences between right and wrong are utterly lost on you, and it is because of ignorant attitudes like this that we are in the state we are. Because of the failings you display here.. we all "loose". I'd suggest being ashamed, but i doubt it matters. ~Bang Edited April 21, 2019 by Bang 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, visionary said: I think hearings aren't a bad idea. I'd recommend they each start with a specific event or charge which they're looking into. Maybe start with a list of allegations that might or might not be proven, or impeachable. For example, firing of Comey and obstruction of justice. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 They have numerous examples/instances of obstruction of justice, so yeah, a very good place to start. Much worse than lying about a blowjob. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 11 minutes ago, BRAVEONAWARPATH said: Does Ken (or Fox News, for that matter) feel the same way about Clinton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 Fun fact about Ken Starr...he was a registered Democrat until 1975 when he then switched to the GOP. I wonder what the appeal for him was. Maybe twa can shed some light on it? He is a expert in such matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 Ken Starr still allowed to show his face after what happened under his watch at Baylor? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 Probably matured they say people start that around 25' some people anyway. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 10 minutes ago, StillUnknown said: Ken Starr still allowed to show his face after what happened under his watch at Baylor? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 interesting op ed The Mueller report concludes it was not needed https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/439840-the-mueller-report-concludes-it-was-not-needed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 11 minutes ago, twa said: interesting op ed It’s not so much interesting as it is stupid and dishonest. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 Just now, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: It’s not so much interesting as it is stupid and dishonest. strong words considering the source, but everyone's got a opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 6 minutes ago, twa said: everyone's got a opinion. A few of us also have facts. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Trump likes Guiliani as an attorney, and I think it’s because it’s obvious Rudy doesn’t take notes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ixcuincle Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 (edited) 13 hours ago, twa said: strong words considering the source, but everyone's got a opinion. Really is all you have. Facts do not support the positions that the GOP has. I know, you think facts are opinions...😉 Edited April 22, 2019 by Skintime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 18 minutes ago, Skintime said: Really is all you have. Facts do not support the positions that the GOP has. I know, you think facts are opinions...😉 Is a professional opinion a fact? Been told a lot of things were fact, that weren't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Individual-1 acting up 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozo the kKklown Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Mostly because Dems are ****footing and cannot get on message. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 (edited) 34 minutes ago, twa said: Is a professional opinion a fact? Been told a lot of things were fact, that weren't. It’s a good thing there’s no carpal tunnel dysentery. With the amount of bull**** flowing through your fingers when you type, you’d be highly at risk. Edited April 22, 2019 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Cooked Crack said: Individual-1 acting up We now come to the core of the problem with DOJ policy. The GOP, and likely most of the (ignorant) public will interpret "high crimes and misdemeanors" as requiring criminal conduct proven beyond a reasonable doubt. That's not the intention of the phrase. At English common law, which the Constitution phrase was based on, that meant a much broader range of conduct than actual felonies and misdemeanors. So since DOJ can't indict, if we accept that crimes must precede impeachment and/or conviction, no one is impeachable. Obviously, the logical answers are easy; either the english common law interpretation of high crimes and misdemeanors controls, or the DOJ policy is null and void and DOJ must make a traditional prosecutorial decision. We must wholly reject the illogical argument the President is putting forth. It would place him above and beyond the rule of law. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 How do we know that the founding fathers didn’t want a president that was above the law? Maybe that was their whole point? Eh? EH? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 He can be impeached for about anything......I'm still waiting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 23 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: How do we know that the founding fathers didn’t want a president that was above the law? Maybe that was their whole point? Eh? EH? They wouldn't have left all these loop holes if they didnt. Just now, twa said: He can be impeached for about anything......I'm still waiting Shut up. The people you are happy to vote into office are the exact reason he cant be and you know this. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now