Jumbo

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Recommended Posts

Trump’s mentioned Cohen’s father (in-law?) multiple times on twitter.

Edited by visionary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Admiring the notion of Alex Jones launching "a project on fake news". 

 

And I'd really rather Cohen be questioned in public. Otherwise all we get is spokesmen from both parties announcing dueling spin about what got said. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, who knows how many of these unqualified ****s have access to top secret info that could hurt us if they trade it away?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yup...the take is dozens  of bad clearances, hidden from the review system in some cases i think i heard....more than a few at the top...this is one thing i have been waiting for...hopefully the story is rigorously sourced and have some sticking power....i've been wondering a long time just how much intel the rooskies, china, and middle east dudes have been getting via willing don, stupid don, or corrupt people around don...

 

for awhile now, i've been having to use discipline in not just telling any republican (other than never-trumpers) that wants to opine on anything political to me to forget about it and go **** themselves

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Hooper said:

We need a wall around the Trump family to keep us all safe.

 

Unfortunately I think they are destined for a waterfront mansion in Sochi rather than behind prison walls. But at least the grifters won’t be here. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jared has a clearance?  

 

I thought I'd read that Trump had withdrawn the application after he couldn't get one. (Since "he holds no official government position"). (The same reason he doesn't need to divest himself of the family's bribery opportunities business interests.)

 

And that Trump was simply feeding him everything, without bothering to get a clearance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, visionary said:

Great, who knows how many of these unqualified ****s have access to top secret info that could hurt us if they trade it away?

I'd bet they already have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Charges against Roger Stone include obstruction, false statement and witness tampering.

I think a little waterboarding may be in order. It's okay. Republicans don't consider that torture.

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Burgold said:

Charges against Roger Stone include obstruction, false statement and witness tampering.

I think a little waterboarding may be in order. It's okay. Republicans don't consider that torture.

Hopefully he got some rough treatment when he was placed in the car.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll get excited when somebody gets indicted for something other than crimes related to the investigation. 

Wake me when they start throwing words like treason out there until then they can keep claiming witch hunt.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Roger Stones arrest was long overdue. Shoulda been behind bars forty years ago. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, redskinss said:

I'll get excited when somebody gets indicted for something other than crimes related to the investigation. 

Wake me when they start throwing words like treason out there until then they can keep claiming witch hunt.

 

You likely will never see that. Because 1) its not needed to be convicted of treason to get them out of power/office/arrested 2) typically they get you on all the little things because the bigger things come with a much greater burden of proof. Thats why you see people getting 20 different indictments - cause all the little ones add up just as well and serve the same ends AND are easier to prove 3) You dont charge someone like stone with treason. Hes the small fish. Trump gets treason if anyone. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, redskinss said:

I'll get excited when somebody gets indicted for something other than crimes related to the investigation. 

Wake me when they start throwing words like treason out there until then they can keep claiming witch hunt.

You really can't. You can't claim witch hunt with so many convictions.


 

Edited by Burgold
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice snippet:

 

Seems like a pretty clear statement of collusion between the campaign and Wikileaks. Trump's going to have to start claiming he was ignorant of everything going on around him, something that goes against his mythological uber-leader persona.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RedskinsFan44 said:

Nice snippet:

 

Seems like a pretty clear statement of collusion between the campaign and Wikileaks. Trump's going to have to start claiming he was ignorant of everything going on around him, something that goes against his mythological uber-leader persona.

I think Rudy tried floating that balloon last week. Pretty sure if Mueller sees it floating by he can pop it pretty easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So today we learn that the Trump campaign was actively seeking help from Wikileaks, who we know was a front for Russian intel services stolen material. 

 

“No collusion”

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.