• Blog Entries

    • By Destino in ES Coverage
         1
      We’re still doing this?  Absolutely!  Despite all the compelling reasons to just let everyone go home and enjoy and extended offseason, this is not an option.  The games must be played, and therefore we the long-suffering fans will feel compelled to watch.  Even games no reasonable football fan would choose to watch like, for example, today’s Redskins Jets game.   

      Today’s convergence of sadness features the 30th ranked scoring offense (Jets 14.4 ppg) versus the 32nd (Redskins 12.0 ppg).  The first team to 15 wins!  With no playoff aspirations the compelling story lines for this game are largely limited to watching young players (hopefully) develop.  Dwayne Haskins gets his first home start and Derrius Guice is back from injury.   
       
      My, reasonable, goals for today’s game:  
      1- Score a touchdown 
      2- Score more than 17 points.   
      3- Haskins throws for 200 yards or more with no interceptions  
      4- Guice runs the ball at least 10 times and finishes at 3.5 yards per carry and healthy.  
       
      Hoping for a win at this point feels like setting myself up for disappointment, so I’m happy to settle for an entertaining loss.  
       
      Special thanks to @pez for some excellent Guinness beef stew.  If you absolutely have to stand in a frozen parking lot at 9am, the best place to do it is at the Extremeskins Tailgate with Pez and @Huly.  Great fans, great people. 
       
      The Redskins have declared for the following players as inactive: 
      Paul Richardson  
      Colt McCoy 
      Deshazor Everett 
      Chris Thompson  
      Ross Pierschbacher 
      Vernon Davis  
      Tim Settle  
       
      The Jets declared the following players as inactive  
      Nate Hairston  
      Darryl Roberts  
      Paul Worrilow 
      Matthias Farley  
      CJ Mosley  
      Jordan Willis  
      Leo Koloamatangi 
       
      1st Quarter - Redskins 0 - 6 Jets
      If you wanted to sit in the cold and watch a football game with some Jets fans at FedEx, but were worried that there were not enough seats available, I have good news.  There’s plenty of space available, so come on down and prove you’re a real fan by sitting though this in person.
       
      Jets dominated the 1st quarter even though they only scored 6 points.  The reason being that Washington managed only 13 yards of offense and a single first down.  
       
      Question: Is it still a check down pass if the QB never looks at anyone else?
       
      2nd Quarter - Redskins 3 - 20 Jets
      The Jets have achieved an insurmountable 13 point lead early in the 2nd quarter.  All hope is lost.

      Is there a more perfect example of the Redskins offense than their first scoring drive in the 2nd quarter?  Interception gives the Redskins the ball on the Jets 16 yard line.  They proceed to march 10 yards backwards before kicking a field goal from the Jets 26.  It's perfect.  Two or three more field goals we can call it a day. 

      The Jets score again and if feels like they are are just piling on at this point.  Three touchdowns in the first half for them, just three points for the redskins.  Our streak of no touchdowns has now extended to 15 quarters. 
       
      3rd Quarter - Redskins 3 - 20 Jets
      There is a spider slowly descending from the ceiling in the press box and it's the most interesting thing that's happened during the third quarter of this game. 
       
      I have decided to allow the spider to live, provided it does not touch me.  I'm off to get some more caffeine. 

      4th Quarter - Redskins 17 - 34 Jets
      The first wave of Redskins fans, the few that are here, started streaming towards the exits after that 4th Jets touchdown.  As if the Jets didn't have this game wrapped up in the 2nd quarter. 
       
      Jet have now more than doubled their average points per game and have matched their season high of 34 points (and they missed two field goals in this game). 
       
      TOUCHDOWN REDSKINS!  THE DROUGHT IT OVER!  Guice took a short pass from Haskins  all the way to the house.  2 point conversion is successful on a pass from Haskins to Quinn. 
       
      The Redskins score another touchdown!  This feels like an embarrassment of riches, even if we are still certain to lose this game. 
       
      End of Game.
       
      Let's review those reasonable goals I mentioned earlier:
       
      1- Success.
      2- Close enough, I'm counting it
      3- Haskins did throw for over 200, but unfortunately did have an interception. 
      4- Guice was not given the opportunity to run the ball ten times today.  He did however score on a 45 yard TD pass and finish the game healthy.  I'll take it.
       
      Even though the Redskins lost, it was good to see the offense show some faint signs of life and end the streak of games without a TD.  The team looked competitive for much of the second half, and perhaps they could have made this a fun game if they carried that same energy throughout.  It was good to see Guice and Mclaurin show out today.  I think both of them have a future with this team that I look forward to seeing. 

       
       

       
       
       
       
       
brandymac27

Trump and his cabinet/buffoonery- Get your bunkers ready!

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, tshile said:

I'd add you but you've developed a shtick of bad jokes and i can't give you daps for that sorry bro :(

 

Sometimes i laugh but sometimes they make me cringe :(

Really? I can usually feel it when I'm off. I'll work on it.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, HOF44 said:

I love it, to me tshile is pretty much middle america in a lot of positions.  Just a very slight right sway.  I've seen him on this board be portrayed as a right wing nutter and on other boards we were on he was labeled a bleeding heart left winger.  I won't pretend to compare intelligence.  I just think the juxtaposition is informing!

Agreed. I think he is one of the more valuable posters in a lot of political discussions even though I disagree with him probably about 70% of the time.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, HOF44 said:

I love it, to me tshile is pretty much middle america in a lot of positions.  Just a very slight right sway.  I've seen him on this board be portrayed as a right wing nutter and on other boards we were on he was labeled a bleeding heart left winger.  I won't pretend to compare intelligence.  I just think the juxtaposition is informing!

I don't think he is a right wing nutter at all. He is def way more than just "very slight right," but he isn't hopeless like some of the crazies on this forum.

 

What I do think is he likes playing games with words and getting intentionally into intellectually dishonest convos to obfuscate from the real point.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, tshile said:

The same reason pearl clutching gets thrown around so much (and by the same people, imagine that :) )

 

You can keep worrying about me but I don't have time for your nonsense. 


Another predictable deflection from you.

I'm not worried about you. But, I was hoping you'd show some honest thought so I could re-think and adjust my placing of you in the category of people who discard intellectual honesty when challenged. I find there to be benefit in trying to challenge my assumptions by asking questions that might give me new and different information.

Part of the stress people are dealing with in these times are the fact that a population of our country are reacting in emotionally unhealthy ways to threshold breaking violations of decency and integrity in this country. Even those who seem to have the mental capacity to behave otherwise. To deal with that type of stress in my life I try to understand the underlying mechanics, patterns, and deficiencies at play for that occurrence.

 

Edited by Fresh8686
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These people who say they stay because they are preventing a greater bad will never resign because they love the power. Coats' is constantly out the loop.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not be surprised if the "stopping a greater evil" crowd have basically set the red line at "literally using nukes" and nothing short of that.

 

Thankfully Mattis is supposed to be required to sign off on any nuke usage so it wouldn't surprise me if he basically has half a dozen people on speed dial in the White House to intervene if he ever gets the call from Trump.

 

 

In any event, someone put it best on Twitter.

 

What Trump is conducting is a slow motion Saturday Night Massacre.  He's getting everyone BUT this go around's Archibald Cox out, so presumably if/when he moves on "Cox" everyone else will have been removed first.  Then it's basically up to Congress and...uhhhhhhh....

Edited by DogofWar1
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd hate to see 1412 page threads get shut down. Can we pls stop making this personal? I'm guilty of it too but I've come to realize over 16+ years here on ES that most of you aren't idiots and assholes. Besides..it takes one to know one. ?

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So normalizing the fact that we have a president who thinks it's OK to revoke clearances for those that critique him. Maybe I'm ignorant, but I don't ever remember another president doing this, certainly without cause to do so like he is with Brennan. 

 

Of course the GOP and DEMs should be livid about it, but certainly there will be tough talk from the Lindsey's Graham's of the world. They'll accept it and move onto the next thing. To me that is the most frustrating part of this presidency, away go the norms. 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

I don't think he is a right wing nutter at all. He is def way more than just "very slight right," but he isn't hopeless like some of the crazies on this forum.

 

What I do think is he likes playing games with words and getting intentionally into intellectually dishonest convos to obfuscate from the real point.

 

 

Im mean its either one or the other at this point and neither is a particularly good look. I do find it hard to believe hes as stupid as he is making himself look. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

He is def way more than just "very slight right," but he isn't hopeless like some of the crazies on this forum.

 

 

 

See, I think if you believe he is more than slight right your living in a somewhat insular world.  I always strive to be careful not to become to enamored of only hearing what I like.  Even if I walk way thinking, what a nut it's worth it to run across a few people with valid points I needed to hear.  I know everyone hates Trump voters in here, but I'm of the opinion there were 2 types.  Wall Street crew who wanted the tax cut and monetary policy they have gotten.  And people so despondent and hopeless they latched on to what they wanted to hear, and said what the hell it might happen, and if not it can't get any worse for me.  

 

There is a segment of our population that has been left behind, ignored and left to die on the vine by globalization and destruction of union and consumer protections.  Their lashing out by voting Trump was bad for all of us, but to them they felt like they had nothing to lose as the Dem party wasn't addressing their needs either.  

 

I'm not sure I could begin to solve this.  It's a huge problem that our fractured political process is in not position to even address.  It will take a lot of honest smart people working together to solve it, and we are far from that in todays climate.

 

Great now I'm depressed!! lol

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Busch1724 said:

Of course the GOP and DEMs should be livid about it, but certainly there will be tough talk from the Lindsey's Graham's of the world. They'll accept it and move onto the next thing. To me that is the most frustrating part of this presidency, away go the norms. 

....Well this is in the purview of the President. 

 

 

 

Edited by Cooked Crack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, it's in his purview, but has any other president done this in the past for simply being critical of them? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so about the buffoonery---speaking of the title---going on in here and a number of the players

 

look at all the derailing from the stupid raising and extension of the democracy now and added obama bull**** and still continuing petty unintelligent bickering, all primarily OT

 

(p.s.you guys keep going after each other while i'm writing this---knock it off lol)

 

(btw, tshile, imv benning is hardly a "nut", but  then i don't really think you are, either )

 

 

benning---while there is worth in argument to your harsh criticism to noinney, TEG's suggestion you dial it back is a good one.  you've also been warned before about "defining" another member in totality "to the board" in ways that push rule 5.  because of the importance of the national reality we share and the actual events taking place, there is room for passion beyond the usual at times, but we still are in this specific forum and operate within that reality, too.  neither noinney's condcut or content qualify him to be shut up or totally dismissed (harshly critiqued, absolutely, as with anyone if merited). now i wrote that before you posted your reply to teg where you defend it. even though i knew the murphy ref, it came off to me like you telling him he needed to shut up.  if a time comes where he needs to "shut up", it would be a mod who'd decide such. 

 

 

 

to another piece and the matter of "trolling" as seen through the eyes of various posters

 

 

Ax is one of the folks who left ES to go to BGO (absolutely fine of course), and yes he did his share of ****ing about this place (also more than fine) but still wanders over every now and then----not to talk redskins football or play with old-timers in long-running non-political tailgate threads etc---but mainly it seems to engage in tailgate political threads for a brief time and then departs. I noticed a couple days ago Ax was on one of his political drive-bys and i thought i'd pop over to see if he was still posting on his home site...now while I'd say Ax has long been easy enough to get a handle on (pun intended), politically, i'm adding a few most recent post excerpts from there to his recent posts here..the first page of 'recent activity'  was all football, and this is just as they show up in excerpt, no editing, and i'll explain why, after

 

Quote

 

True enough. But a court filled with Sotomayor's and Ginsberg's, in IMHO would be the final nail in the country's coffin. 

Protecting that from happening was the best reason there was for voting...

 

 

 

Quote

Just think if he didn't have the entire group of worthless, deranged Democrats, and a large portion of the spineless R's fighting against everything he does. 

He has to complete his term before...

 

this one below is on the redsksins cheerleader brouhaha

 

 

Quote

 

My guess is the majority of these girls know exactly what they're getting into. Their plan is to use their looks to get ahead. Some would be more willing to go further than others, obviously, but...

  

 

 

 

Quote

Knowing full well that the R's aren't much better, they're still, better. 

Need to replace every D, with an R. No exceptions. 

Need to replace every RINO, with an actual R. 

About 20yrs of full...

 

 

 

 

here Ax labels himself, as he sees it 

 

Quote

 

I am independent. But there are many more things I fall on the side of the R's. I have to work real hard to find much meaningful common ground with the D's. 
So, I do take sides on which party sucks...

 

 

 

 

 

Quote

 

There's no doubt that both sides are locked into their positions. But I think pinning the lions share of blame for the many problems we face, on the D's, is accurate, and warranted. The D's have no...

 

 

 

 

 

now i did that not because i thought anything said above was even remotely outrageous per your typcial rightwing dude, but to inform unfamiliar ES'ers with more context of his politics and also show he's posting here in the same manner he posts there....as with other examples i could have picked, trolling is often in the eyes of the beholder...that's why i encourage folks to read how we address this in how we wrote the rule....many cases could be called by any mod either way

 

 

so, regarding all of this, i'm pretty big on calling things out, no matter who/what...i think that's been clear over the years....and i favor it being done in here with such serious topics and events as are often covered in these threads....just keep in mind you're here, not somewhere else......and every now and then some folks might want to ask themselves whether at any particular time if they're really wanting to share space where there's competing views, or be in an actual discussion, perhaps even seeking new or differing data/facts/insight/perspective, or are other other more therapeutically-related motivations in play?

 

btw, if i were to call troll, i would say that the derailers/trolls sure did a great job given the willing participation in the proposed effort...forget trolling, geniuses of the right or left, if you think someone is just stupidly partisan in either direction, consider not engaging them at all other than a down-vote smiley...maybe try letting the stupid die from neglect...in many cases it's a workable option...anyways, cut the stupid

 

 

make no mistake who you're dealing with. i will take you all out.

 

p.s. don't reply to this post (OT)

 

you can use your smiley votes :P

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It should be in their purview in case malfeasance occurs. This president, it is quite a different rationale. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, HOF44 said:

See, I think if you believe he is more than slight right your living in a somewhat insular world.  I always strive to be careful not to become to enamored of only hearing what I like.  Even if I walk way thinking, what a nut it's worth it to run across a few people with valid points I needed to hear.  I know everyone hates Trump voters in here, but I'm of the opinion there were 2 types.  Wall Street crew who wanted the tax cut and monetary policy they have gotten.  And people so despondent and hopeless they latched on to what they wanted to hear, and said what the hell it might happen, and if not it can't get any worse for me.  

 

There is a segment of our population that has been left behind, ignored and left to die on the vine by globalization and destruction of union and consumer protections.  Their lashing out by voting Trump was bad for all of us, but to them they felt like they had nothing to lose as the Dem party wasn't addressing their needs either.  

 

I'm not sure I could begin to solve this.  It's a huge problem that our fractured political process is in not position to even address.  It will take a lot of honest smart people working together to solve it, and we are far from that in todays climate.

 

Great now I'm depressed!! lol

 

I read his views on this forum, I think he is a traditional moderate Republican. There are people who are slight right, but he isn't that. That does not change what I said about him being intellectually dishonest at times and playing that game to move from the larger point people are making, which he did with the convo about Democracy Now.

 

I do agree that the Democratic party have left people behind and moved to the right as well and it's caused us to be here. Trump is the result of Nixon and Reagan Southern strategy, post-civil rights, post-feminist movement that has dominated this nation's politics the last 40-45 years (and whats nuts about this is that was only 10 years. People wanted and demanded rights in a loud and unstoppable fashion for just 10 years and then the backlash has been this for the last 45 years).  I also believe we are coming to a head with Capitalism but that will not happen in our lifetimes as we have been codified with iphones and internet porn, lol. You cannot keep starving people.

Edited by BenningRoadSkin
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Busch1724 said:

 

It should be in their purview in case malfeasance occurs. This president, it is quite a different rationale. 

 

 

 and with this post, ty btw, we are back on topic---let's keep it there and not on other members...for awhile anyway :ols:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will I get banned if I point out that we still need the down vote smiley?

 

Just to stay on topic.  Has a former CIA director ever been revoked the security clearance before?  

Edited by bearrock
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Jumbo said:

 even though i knew the murphy ref, it came off to me like you telling him he needed to shut up.  if a time comes where he needs to "shut up", it would be a mod who'd decide such.

Thats fair. I really said it as a joke, but I can see it being read that way. I never want anyone on a message board to shut up, but I also think we need to stop allowing misleading and lying to be acceptable discourse. It should never be that.

 

But my joke was too far and I accept that. Thanks.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bearrock said:

Will I get banned if I point out that we still need the down vote smiley?

 

 

just use the unhappy one whatever that is--i asked for a "**** you **** bag" but nooooooo...

 

should just be a pic of anyone in 'skins paraphernalia--"sad" 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the value of taking away Brenan's security clearance. I mean I guess it's fine as he no longer works there, but on the other hand, you lose the advantage of his ability to consult to the best of his ability. I'm sure he has a wealth of knowledge, strategies, and contacts that are invaluable, but it's not really possible for him to help they need to talk to him in generalities and "what if" scenarios.

 

The removal comes off as petty and without purpose, but also has the potential to create harm. Worse, it would've at least been nice for Trumps to consult Coates before doing it.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They seem kind of obsessed over this guy.

Edited by visionary
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today hasn't really been full of controversy. I'm guessing something is about to drop considering the original date of the Brennan memo. 

 

Is the "n" word tape ready to drop or something in the Manafort trial? I'm guessing Manafort since there really isn't anything they could release that would supersede discussion about him saying the "n" word. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.