Obamacare...(new title): GOP DEATH PLAN: Don-Ryan's Express

[Hersh]

They are going to get destroyed with this health care bill. 

[Renegade7]

19 minutes ago, StillUnknown said:

 

 

Not signed in

Surprised I am not.

[Busch1724]

1 hour ago, Hersh said:

They are going to get destroyed with this health care bill. 

 

Hopefully...people smart enough to see through it last time. 

[visionary]

 

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited April 26, 2017 by visionary

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

2 hours ago, Busch1724 said:

Hopefully...people smart enough to see through it last time. 

Unfortunately that's not exactly what stopped it last time.

[Larry]

1 hour ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

Unfortunately that's not exactly what stopped it last time.

 

Agreed. What stopped it last time was that it didn't screw people enough to satisfy the FC zealots. This amendment addresses that. 

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

Edited April 27, 2017 by visionary

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

[Larry]

So, the Heritage Foundation is canning their President, because he wasn't effective enough in the fight to repeal a health care plan that the Heritage Foundation wrote. 

 

And people try to claim that the Far Right hasn't dragged the goalpost of far-right-ness completely out of the stadium. 

[@DCGoldPants]

1 hour ago, Larry said:

So, the Heritage Foundation is canning their President, because he wasn't effective enough in the fight to repeal a health care plan that the Heritage Foundation wrote. 

 

And people try to claim that the Far Right hasn't dragged the goalpost of far-right-ness completely out of the stadium. 

 

 

DeMint was the poster-boy big gov't guy who claimed to be rallying against big gov't. Stay out of his personal finances......just don't complain when he takes a flashlight up your #*$&@ to make sure you're being a good moral boy or girl.

[DogofWar1]

3 hours ago, Larry said:

And people try to claim that the Far Right hasn't dragged the goalpost of far-right-ness completely out of the stadium. 

I mean, we ARE in the tailgate right now, so...

[bearrock]

I guess we'll find out whether they are really going to keep the legislative filibuster 

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

Edited May 1, 2017 by visionary

[visionary]

 

[visionary]

 

[LD0506]

Here we go- still! There is so much smoke and bull**** flying that people are not looking at the basics of what is proposed. Divert titanic amounts of money from Medicare to pet projects while not even thinking about touching insurance company profits, this is the core, in fact the entirety, of the so-called "health care plan". There is literally zero concern about whether people have health coverage or can see a doctor or just lay down and die, all just collateral damage, utterly irrelevant to the set goals the trogs aspire to. Everything else is bull****, lies and diversions to keep that salient undeniable fact from being part of the narrative. They didn't give a rats ass the first time until it looked like it might cost them votes and/or reelection, they cooked this **** up and were going to ram it through even though it was a bald faced "take the money from health coverage for people we don't care about and put it in our pockets". Only the groundswell of angry constituents gave them pause, but c'mon, do you really think any of them grew a soul since then?

[visionary]

 

 

 

[Larry]

5 minutes ago, visionary said:

 

 

From the article:  

 

Quote

Republicans who support the bill are trying to hold a vote on it this week, before House members return to their districts for a 12-day recess. There's widespread recognition that if the House leaves, it will be much more difficult to pass the measure after a week with constituents.

 

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited May 3, 2017 by visionary

[mistertim]

Trump is all over it but doesn't even know (or likely care) what the **** is actually in it.

[JSSkinz]

I'm just not getting this new bill.  So if you maintain continuous coverage for 60 days then preexisting conditions are covered.  If you don't have insurance and you have pre-existing conditions then this set-aside pool of money will help those individuals.

 

The ACA is like any other healthcare plan where you have to enter under open enrollment.  If you're uninsured and have a preexisting condition would you even be in a situation where you could currently get ACA coverage?  Are they changing this rule with the new bill?

[twa]

7 minutes ago, jschuck12001 said:

I'm just not getting this new bill.  So if you maintain continuous coverage for 60 days then preexisting conditions are covered.  If you don't have insurance and you have pre-existing conditions then this set-aside pool of money will help those individuals.

 

The ACA is like any other healthcare plan where you have to enter under open enrollment.  If you're uninsured and have a preexisting condition would you even be in a situation where you could currently get ACA coverage?  Are they changing this rule with the new bill?

 

You can presently get coverage under several life changing events under the ACA outside the open enrollment window..

[LD0506]

2 hours ago, Larry said:

There's widespread recognition that if the House leaves, it will be much more difficult to pass the measure after a week with constituents.

 

Gee, because the raucous crowds demanding they do their job and represent their interests might sway them? Damn shame there.

 

Somewhere in the fine print the Repubs must have a marketing scheme that will pay off bigly but somehow involves lampshades made from human flesh and skull ashtrays. That's the only thing that makes sense from their plans to eliminate health care, deny food to the hungry and massively increase pollution.