Tom [Giants fan] Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 I was just watching Irvin interview the trio of receivers in Dallas. Hey, as much as we hate to admit it, they are a talented trio. So, with that, are we looking at the most talent at receiver in the NFC East? Toomer, Hilliard, Shockey (he's not really a TE) - Coles, Gardner, McCants - Glenn, Galloway, Bryant. This is some pretty good talent at the position. So, here is the question: Is the NFC East the most talented at the WR spot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dchogs Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 gotta put pinkston, thrash and mitchell in there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 Pinkston LOL Tom--yeah, I'd say so. Look at the league--Most of the other divisions have one great WR on the team, then a decent-at-best second option. The East(sans Eagles) have 3-4 legit targets per team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagles_Legendz Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 Ghost, the Eagles WRs would be getting more recognition if McNabb could get them the ball more often. Pinkston had 7 catches (I believe) today, and Thrash had a good game as well (has more yards this season than R. Gardner). The Eagles have the worst set of WRs in the East, but they aren't as bad as they're made out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 I'm just clowning your guys, EL. No, they aren't terrible but I just like to clown the Eagles. Hey, at least you get to clown our own Toast Jimoh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WonderBoy Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 Both times I've seen Jimoh on the field he gave up a huge play. He's horrible. As for the NFC Easts receivers, No, the only really good receivers are Coles and Toomer. Everyone else is mediocre or hasn't met their full potential. I'm a little disappointed in Gardner. He could be playing a lot better than he is. The best division for receivers in my opinion is the AFC North. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 I disagree and agree. AFC North seems deeper, but the only really good receivers are not just Coles and Toomer. But that's beside the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a_good_brotha Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 Originally posted by dchogs gotta put pinkston, thrash and mitchell in there... :laugh: He said best not worst. Anyways, I was thinking the same thing Tom. I hate too admit it too but the Cow----(fill in the blanks however you feel) do have talented WR's. Brotha aka Bro Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yomar Posted September 29, 2003 Share Posted September 29, 2003 Owens, T. Holt, K. Robinson, I. Bruce, D. Jackson, T Streets and A. Boldin, have to go with the NFC West on this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OURYEAR#56 Posted September 29, 2003 Share Posted September 29, 2003 Never put pinkston, Trash, or itchell in the arguement. We're up there. I think it's a close race with the South. But TO looked really human yesterday. I think the 49ers should have hire Dennis Green not Dennis Erickson. Maybe they got the names mixed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkeyBoy Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 The best stories are in the NFC... and the NFC is on FOX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.