DFlo Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 Hey guys, I've updated my mock draft for the end of the season/pre-combine. You can check it out here: 2012 NFL Mock Draft Let me know what you think. Would love to hear your feedback! ---------- Post added February-5th-2012 at 05:14 PM ---------- Let me just say that this was a tough pick, and it took me a while to decide on. It's going to be tough for you guys if Blackmon/Luck/Griffin/Claiborne all go before your pick. Value wise it seems like 6th is just where the first tier of prospects fall off IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMayo21 Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 So help me GOD if we take an OT at #6. I feel like we're gunna trade up for RGIII, but if we can't and RGII/Luck is off the board, I'd hope we'd trade back for more picks. If we draft Reiff I'll probably cry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 if we don't get a FA QB or any help in FA for the line, drop down and get decastro and another g/c to solidify the line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 So help me GOD if we take an OT at #6. I feel like we're gunna trade up for RGIII, but if we can't and RGII/Luck is off the board, I'd hope we'd trade back for more picks. If we draft Reiff I'll probably cry I''ll bring the Kleenex, Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirtyfive2seven Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 I'll need tissues as well. I understand the pick, and it makes a lot of sense but a QB is what is really needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifthorkid88 Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 No way we go OL with the 6th pick. If that the case, I see us trading down like last year and acquiring more picks. I still see a move up to #2 to get RG3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born In 93 Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 dont want rg3 but i dont want a tackle at 6 either. I'd rather a trade down, hopefully shanahan is eyeing a 2nd round QB we can take a chance on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashburn Dave Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Just say no to an OL at 6. Please trade down if we want to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradboyd80 Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 I'd rather see us draft Kirkpatrick #6 overall if we stay put in that scenario (no trade up), or to trade back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tibbidoe Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 I honestly can't imagine another OL pick in the top 10 so soon. I figure trading up or down is most likely, since #6 doesn't really put us in ideal position for what we need. Both QBs would likely be gone, OL is needed, but not that high and no other position is of high enough priority to take there. Just my take on it, and I openly admit to not being an expert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mocountyskins Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 If we take an OL in the 1st round then clearly someone in that draft room is confused Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsforlife101 Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 I'd rather see us draft Kirkpatrick #6 overall if we stay put in that scenario (no trade up), or to trade back. +1 I will throw my TV out the window if we take Reiff at 6th and the whole Extremeskins board will be in meltdown mode level 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 So help me GOD if we take an OT at #6. I feel like we're gunna trade up for RGIII, but if we can't and RGII/Luck is off the board, I'd hope we'd trade back for more picks. If we draft Reiff I'll probably cry Given who he has going in the top 5 and he isn't projecting trades, who else would you take at 6? The choice could really only be between Reiff and Kirkpatrick and do you really want another drug problem on your team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMayo21 Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Given who he has going in the top 5 and he isn't projecting trades, who else would you take at 6? I personally have no idea. I don't actually see us picking at 6 regardless of what happens, we'll either be at 2 or trade back in my mind. But I feel Reiff is a reach at 6. Say Kalil happened to fall to us at 6, then itd be justified to take an OT but other than that I don't know who we'd pick at 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DFlo Posted February 10, 2012 Author Share Posted February 10, 2012 Given who he has going in the top 5 and he isn't projecting trades, who else would you take at 6? The choice could really only be between Reiff and Kirkpatrick and do you really want another drug problem on your team? Exactly man, I was stuck on that pick for a while. Though I am very high on Kirkpatrick, I think he might have a few more character concerns now that have pushed him down a bit. Hence why I went with Reiff. It's a tough situation with all the top skill players gone, hence why most of the reply's here aren't positive. But at the same time, it's a very real possibility that Claiborne, Luck, Griffin and Blackmon are all gone by 6. Although a trade down would be the idea option. Anyways, it's a tough position that you guys may or may not have to deal with come draft day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins4ever Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 The Redskins have Willie Smith, who can step in a play RT. I don't agree with your mock draft at all. The Redskins most pressing need is quarterback and until they draft a franchise quarterback this team will continue to finish 4-12, 5-11, and 6-10 every year. They have to trade up and that means giving up their 6th overall and their 1st round pick next year. Tannehill, Foles, and Weeden are all developmental projects who are not ready to play yet. Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan need to pull the trigger and select RG3 and move up in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadKarma Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Meh with Trent being a potsmoker, the pick could be worse spent on a guy like Rieff who could play either RT or LT for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLF Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Sees RGIII going to another team.....exits thread...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabsuz Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 You can find elite offensive line men in the late rounds and into undrafted, investing a lot of 1st round picks into your o line (besides LT) is a waste of resources most of the time, 2nd round is where you can more often than not strike gold also. Unless Walter Jones, Steve Hutchinson, or Jonathan Ogden are sitting there at 6 I want a skill position player at number 6, namely a QB, a specific QB who was awarded a certain collegiate accolade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpheusmeyers Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Given who he has going in the top 5 and he isn't projecting trades, who else would you take at 6? The choice could really only be between Reiff and Kirkpatrick and do you really want another drug problem on your team? Good point. The OP's first 5 picks are in line with what I have seen recently on other sites like walterfootball. And trading down, while possible, is no sure thing. I agree that at #6 the pick would come down to Reiff or Kirkpatrick. Richardson is intriguing, but he doesn't fill a need. Maybe someone will want to trade up for Richardson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-bomb Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Would miami take richardson when they got bush an drafted thomas? Maybe bpa thats lb or wr dont think they go rb this early Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE HAMMER'IN HOG Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I wouldn't get to worried he is not a top 10 pick just a lot of speculation right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman21ST Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I wouldn't get to worried he is not a top 10 pick just a lot of speculation right now. Who's not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokerPacker Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I think if Jerel Worthy is still available, I'd rather take him as a solution to our pass rush problem than an OLB. The difference between our pass rush a year ago and this past season is the absence of an inside push as provided by Cullen Jenkins. If we can collapse the pocket and keep the QB from stepping up, that'll push him right into Clay Matthews, which I think will have a greater impact than another edge rusher while still allowing the QB to step up into the pocket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsGuy Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 You can find elite offensive line men in the late rounds and into undrafted, investing a lot of 1st round picks into your o line (besides LT) is a waste of resources most of the time, 2nd round is where you can more often than not strike gold also. Unless Walter Jones, Steve Hutchinson, or Jonathan Ogden are sitting there at 6 I want a skill position player at number 6, namely a QB, a specific QB who was awarded a certain collegiate accolade. True. The only offensive linemen you take in the top 10 are left tackles. They are the only OL considered premium blue-chip players. You DO NOT take a right tackle (or someone you plan to put there) in the top 10. You can find them (and players who can play that position) in later rounds. This was not a well thought out choice, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.