End2round2sanders Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 No not QB Colt McCoy, but I think this is huge in terms of whether Cle goes after RG3 and if they get McCoy they get that option offense they ran in Denver, they probably go RG3. This is HUGE if you ask me. I'm nervous...I hope they get Mike Mularkey from ATL instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpskins10 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Shurmur is an offensive coach. Whatever offensive staff he decides to bring in won't have an impact on whether he selects RG3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepo11 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 No not QB Colt McCoy, but I think this is huge in terms of whether Cle goes after RG3 and if they get McCoy they get that option offense they ran in Denver, they probably go RG3. This is HUGE if you ask me. I'm nervous...I hope they get Mike Mularkey from ATL instead. He mentioned that Jax would be interested in interviewing him for the Head Coaching gig there, no mention of him going to Cleveland(unless you read this in an article somewhere). He also wouldn't be allowed to interview for the same position he holds with Denver for a different team, unless it would a move up the coaching chain (i.e Head Coach). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 I got news for you, Colt McCoy was a spread option QB at Texas. He just ran it much better than Tebow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
End2round2sanders Posted January 8, 2012 Author Share Posted January 8, 2012 Bah my mistake Casserly said on twitter Mccoy to Jax. My bad Rufus... Delete this.. Sorry guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 That would all be fascinating, except that he reported that Jacksonville was interested in him as a Head Coach candidate. Nothing about the Browns, for whom that would make no sense for multiple reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlkyCaramel Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Delete. Already said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpskins10 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Yeah, I was going to say there's no way they could bring in an OC that's already an OC because it's a lateral move. So OP must have heard wrong bc this info only makes sense for a team that currently has a HC vacancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
End2round2sanders Posted January 8, 2012 Author Share Posted January 8, 2012 Yea I did hear in wrong. Sorry about that.. delete this.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 As has already been mentioned Shurmur is an offensive coach, he isn't going to change his system for an offensive coordinator. He and Holmgren are both believers of the WCO. The option isn't some staple of McCoy's offense either it's just something they had to adapt to. I wouldn't read that much into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.