visionary Posted June 30, 2019 Share Posted June 30, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 A dictator and a wanna be dictator meet again for gigantic photo op. Dictator moves all over wanna be dictator like a ****. Film at eleven! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 41 minutes ago, visionary said: Maybe by "our allies", he means "Saudi Arabia"? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 Tucker should be fired for that comment. It’s appalling on its own merits to excuse a murderous dictator but it’s even worse within the context of him greasing the wheels and desensitizing it to his viewers that some strong men leaders just have to kill a few dissident citizens here and there. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 On 7/1/2019 at 2:18 AM, Momma There Goes That Man said: Tucker should be fired for that comment. It’s appalling on its own merits to excuse a murderous dictator but it’s even worse within the context of him greasing the wheels and desensitizing it to his viewers that some strong men leaders just have to kill a few dissident citizens here and there. He's prepping his viewers for when it starts happening over here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 Quote Second, politically, a treaty has all sorts of domestic ramifications in South Korea, which the government of President Moon Jae-in has yet to tackle. This is likely why the Moon government abandoned its 2018 push for a treaty and fell back to a vaguer “peace regime,” and then to an even vaguer “war-ending declaration.” The legal weight of these two alternate concepts is unclear. One obvious political hurdle is the implacable opposition of the South Korean Right to détente with North Korea. I have mentioned this issue in the past. The Moon government has run its North Korea outreach with little effort to recruit center-right opinion. But Moon only won the presidency with 41 percent of the vote. Without some conservative acceptance of a peace treaty, there is a fair chance that the next time the South Korean right wins the presidency, it will undo the treaty. In fact, this is a threat to the entire Moon program on North Korea, and it has happened before. From 1998 to 2008, the South Korean Left, holding the presidency, pursued a “Sunshine Policy” with North Korea. The domestic Right was not brought into that effort, and on the return of a conservative to the South Korean presidency in 2008, that conservative president, Lee Myung-bak, rolled back the Sunshine Policy. This could happen again to Moon. Quote The other big political problem with a treaty is the constitution of South Korea, which denies the existence of North Korea and claims sovereignty over the entire peninsula. A treaty would suggest, at least by implication, mutual recognition of the two Koreas by each other. It is not entirely clear how big this hurdle could be. I have spoken to this point at several conferences here in South Korea and have heard mixed responses. Some people seem to think that may be a way to legally kludge around the constitution. Others have suggested that Moon would have to change the constitution to pursue a formal treaty; hence, the idea of a “peace regime” or a “war-ending declaration” is the path of least political resistance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted July 24, 2019 Author Share Posted July 24, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted July 26, 2019 Author Share Posted July 26, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 Why are we still involved with NK at all? South Korea and China have shut the door on any meaningful threat that could hold them accountable. NK have nuclear weapons already. Sanctions aren't going to take food of their ruling classes table and they don't care about their peasant class at all. The US needs to find a way to extract themselves entirely from this situation because unless something drastically changes, there are no achievable goals left that are worth the trouble. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 (edited) Edited August 1, 2019 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterMP Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 11 minutes ago, visionary said: America first (who cares if they can nuke South Korea and Japan and maybe Taiwan, etc.). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 Kim could nuke japan or south korea and 45 would be cool as long as he got his letter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted August 9, 2019 Author Share Posted August 9, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted August 11, 2019 Share Posted August 11, 2019 I'll bet he does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted August 11, 2019 Share Posted August 11, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted August 13, 2019 Share Posted August 13, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 Somebody (some country) has got to be feeding that little twit a lot of technology. We're talking about a country that can't keep the electricity n in their capital city all night long. (At least I remember reading that, 10-20 years ago.) And I sure don't see China doing it. Moron's probably their biggest threat, right now. Russia, I could see doing it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now