OxonHillSkinsFan89 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 is not a REDSKIN I meant to say.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Wait, aRedskins, the ES member is Brandon Stokley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A.C.O.L.B. Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 It's on 980 too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cambl2Moss Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Thank God this guy has an inflated sense of self! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stadium-Armory Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 He and Stallworth both seem like 1yr insurance policies anyway. As options if the younger players don't pan out. If this is true, no big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A.C.O.L.B. Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 http://www.facebook.com/espnradio980/posts/10150247447741691 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_89 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 This day just keeps getting better and better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinz4Life12 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 no real loss here.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A.C.O.L.B. Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Here's the agent's twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/RickSmith1956 RickSmith1956 Spoke to soon. Brandon Stokley won't sign with Redskins. Too many WR's signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gortiz Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 NOOOOOO WAYYYYYYYYY! The season is saved, holy **** ... (i mean, some people thought the sky was falling when we supposedly signed him) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Gaffney makes sense as a possible No. 2, possession type. Stallworth makes sense as a deep threat. Stokley didn't really make sense. If he's not on the team, that's probably fine. If he was on the team, that would be fine too, as this is not exactly all that meaningful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyZeb Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Stokley must have little confidence in himself if he's scared to compete with our receiving core. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNoles21 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 AdamSchefter: RT @RickSmith1956: Spoke to soon. Brandon Stokley won't sign with Redskins. Too many WR's signed. [via Twitter] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audible_Red40 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Your loss Stokley. Guess you don't wanna win a ring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
braindx Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Stokley must have little confidence in himself if he's scared to compete with our receiving core. That's what I'm thinking. Thankfully, this means hopefully more playing time for the rooks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ncr2h Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 With all the other signings, he didn't really seem like much of a fit here. We just drafted a couple of WRs. To have a guy like Brandon Stokely stealing playing time from them isn't beneficial at this point in his career. With Moss, Stallworth, and Gaffney, there is enough veteran presence to hold us over until one of the younger guys catches on. Stallworth and Gaffney at least have upside - Stallworth was a burner like S.Moss and probably still has something left. Gaffney is solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Good not broken up over this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Well that's too bad. I liked him for the vet min. He would have been a great slot receiver. Oh well. It's not like we won't have an assload of receivers in camp. Now let's sign some O linemen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 No big deal. He's 35 anyway and we have a glut of WRs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lombardi's_kid_brother Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Is Tom Waddell available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjunkies Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 We should target Keenan Mccardell now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 Stokley was the only one of those guys who I actually was happy about. Stallworth infuriates me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2STaylor1 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 this is good news, i dont see a need for another vet whos too old to be here when we will be competitive.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brett81 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 We should target Keenan Mccardell now. Shouldn't be too difficult since he's currently the Skins' WR's Coach...jus sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P007 Posted July 28, 2011 Share Posted July 28, 2011 He's going to be good in a 4-3 - something we will probably revert back to in a couple years, if history is any indication.Redskins tradition is to bring in some coach with a totally different philosophy, and rather than take the good players and create a system to fit the players, we trash the players to bring a new system which NEVER lasts. I think you are right. It actually could be sooner then 2 years though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.