Hooper Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I have to believe this is inaccurate for the sake of my own sanity. The people running this team can't be this stupid. I'm with you, my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beans Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Is Wayne Brady gonna have to... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Full Monty Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 It's just a smokescreen It's just a smokescreen It's just a smokescreen *cries* Oh man please let this be a rumor otherwise I'll be joining you in the non-stop sobbing if this goes down and we give up 2 1sts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jivelikenice Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Not necessarily. There are multiple teams who are reportedly interested in Gabbert, and are interested in taking him, or trading up for him. Teams like San Fran, Arizona, and Minnesota come to mind. Especially San Fran and Arizona.Not saying I'm advocating this, but I think we'll likely see Gabbert taken before we get there. I don't know how much it would take for us to get him, but if the Shanahans believe in him that much, I say take him. He's a safer prospect than Locker or Newton. 'Zona- I'm just guessing but I think at minimum he makes it past #6. All speculation from 'Zona is they want a vet qb. It maybe a smokescreen but they just went through 2 rookies last year and do you really think Fitz wants to play with another rookie QB? Do you think the franchise wants to risk alienating him if they do draft a QB? Browns- Have McCoy and will give him a chance to be the guy first San Fran- Possibly, but they's also been linked heavily with defensive players. I also read yesterday where Harbuagh is lukewarm on Gabbert. Titans- Possibly, but have also been linked to Fairley and Dalton Dallas- No There are three possibilities between 5-9 IMO and its not an overwhelming possibility in any of those spots. Those teams could just as easily go in another direction. Why not see how the board falls and then trade up to #6 or #7 is you're getting nervous. The price would be a lot cheaper than going to #2! The only reason you do this deal if you're the Shanny's is if you believe w/o a doubt that Gabbert is a franchise guy. If you trade up for the sake of just getting a QB, then its a catastrophic mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beans Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 ****. I don't think that any of the QBs in this draft will even attain the level of success of the Sexy One. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stricknine Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Oh hell no! If hes there at 10 and we want him...fine, take him. But no trading up dammit!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuckDallas81 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I hope this doesnt't happen I would rather stay where we're at or trade down and just take Locker if they want a qb that bad. I think Locker would fit better in our system anyway. I know it really doesnt mean much but I thought he did the best on the Gruden qb camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BnG4ever326 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I doubt if this happens. They're either gonna stay @ 10 if who they want will be there, or they trade down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Last year we were supposed to trade the farm to grab Bradford... JLC reported that a trading of Haynesworth was imminent and was gonna take place on day 2 of the draft... "Sources" claimed that Snyder was gonna pull up the Brinks truck to go after Peppers and spend on him like "it was Monopoly money"... Now we're looking to move up to the #2 spot to grab a QB... ...yawn... When it happens, I'll react. Until then, it's a waste of energy to get all hyper about it...because the track record shows that 95% of these things never come true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird_1972 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 If we trade up to get anyone in this draft it will prove that this team is destined, once again, for failure. What a horrible horrible decision that would be. Who is worth trading up for?? Only AJ Green and Peterson - MAYBE. And even that's a stretch considering that the opportunity cost for our team is so high when it comes to each draft pick. Just plain stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 would be terrible...I don't think it happens though... at least I hope not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolio47 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Shanahan needs this guy to follow him around. or8UhztOSH4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aarobinson Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I hate JLC so much. I hoped when he went away that he would stop ****ing with me. Move up for Gabbert? With what ammo? Is that going to be our whole draft? I'll be skeptical, to say the least, if we go all Ricky Williams for a spread QB with zero pocket presence. This move would only make sense if he really is the second coming of Elway, and I dont see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSHRedskins3ATLBraves3 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 If we break the bank to move up and get Gabbert, I might actually picket Redskins Park. Please tell me this isn't true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VetMinimum+Incentives Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Yikes!! To move from 10 to 2 it's gonna take AT LEAST our 1st and 2nd this year and our first next year. Either Shanny thinks Gabbert is a taller more athletic version of Drew Brees or this is pure bovine scatology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 What do you mean?? draft both? oh, say it ain't so Yeah drafting both. You think the Wildcat changed stuff, you aint seen nothing yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assassin 21 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I might break my television if this happens. I was just as pissed when we traded for McNabb. This would prove that Shanny has learned nothing from last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny555 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Crazy part is, it'll take two #1's to get get Gabbert and it sounds like two 2nd's for Kolb. Atleast Kolb has some NFL experience. Kinda blows my mind. But like someone else said, until it happens..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_89 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I absolutely agree with a Cali 007 Just Lost& Confused is a joke and would never believe anything he report unless someone more credible co~signs it. Even if his wer true then I'll still be a REDSKINS fan win or lose. FYI ~ I really want Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Shanny has a lot of trust capital from me. If he does this, though, then he's going all in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 If this move happens my 32in hd tv and my 46 hd tv are getting shatterted and replaced by the redskins for emotional distress. Cause if this happen nothing has changed with the redksins. period. Different names same &*((#$%& Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Paint Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Hehe, I had a dream a few weeks ago that we drafted Gabbert. I mentioned it in a thread a while back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postong Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I like Gabbert and I think he'll be a good pro QB, but I don't like him enough to give up what it would take to draft him at number 2 overall. Each one of our draft picks is more valuable than most teams or the draft value chart would indicate. We have way too many needs to fill - PLEASE don't do this. Take him if he falls to 10 or take Locker (which I would prefer). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chet06 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 i love how everyone on this board wants to stock up on draft picks and not draft a qb. If we were the Chiefs (Scott Pioli), Patriots, Eagles or Steelers I would get it. But when have the redskins ever hit on a draft pick below the top 15 pick in the entire draft? I remember when we traded down in the 1st round to draft (supposedly learned our lesson) and drafted fred davis, devin thomas and malcolm kelly later...what a joke. the one thing the redskins have done is hit virtually every top 15 draft pick dating back to right after the shuler debacle. ---------- Post added April-27th-2011 at 01:26 AM ---------- the days of winning a Super Bowl without a franchse QB are over....The last time that happed was with the 2000 Ravens. Gibbs worked with Williams in a busted strike year in 1987 and Rypien worked when the O line was incredible...Lachey, Simmons, Bostic, Ray Brown and Jacoby.....so I support giving up next years first to get Gabbert. Extremely, smart accurate and has a great arm (throw in a bone for Snyder hehe. Jeff George without bad character and low IQ.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grego Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 hmm at a later date, i will let this story completely out the bag, the Want of Gabbert n Locker is true.. 99% of what u seeing about it is true.. someone gonna lose a job ? sadly could be true someone gonna lose a job? need a translator please. PM if you must. i have to know what this means!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.