Popeman38 Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 I don't understand why. My opinion is that Dan Snyder is an awful owner - the worst in the NFL - and he bears the most responsibility for destroying a once great franchise. How am I supposed to ignore my opinion on that matter when I pick up a newspaper and read about his latest petty tantrum?I can be swayed, but certainly, the weak, pitiful arguments being put forth in this thread that somehow this has "nothing to do with the Redskins" aren't doing it. Try to be objective about this. Exactly what has been stated here that should make me think otherwise? A bunch of double-talk lawyer speak? You aren't going to be able to convince very many people - objective or otherwise - that this has nothing to do with the Redskins, the general perception people have about the Redskins, or the negative association people are going to have between the lawsuit, Snyder, and the Redskins. That's my point. If 2 or 3 people (by my count) have managed to convince themselves otherwise, good for them, but I don't see how cranking up my "objectivity" toward Snyder should affect that. Remember, we aren't discussing the validity of the lawsuit here, we are discussing whether or not the lawsuit has "anything to do with the Washington Redskins." I've stated my case, and I think, strictly subjectively, it's a very strong one. 2 or 3 people that are persistent enough to keep coming back. Everyone else avoids the discussion and assembling of the same 20 posters who circle bash Snyder. This is like the JC threads all over again. Core posters who blame the rain on JC and a couple posters who defend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.