Fergasun Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 My favorite GOPer right now is Coburn. I've always thought that Newt was unelectable, but when put next to Palin, he ain't half bad. I ended up voting for Romney in the primaries 4 years ago. Daniels and Pawlenty are intriguing. Right now I'd give consideration to any candidate who holds Coburn's endorsement (pending who that will be). I think Coburn would be a pretty decent VP. He shot up in my book quite a bit based on his questioning of Elena Kagan, he was polite and thoughtful. Even though he is as right wing as they come, he wasn't disrespectful like other Senators *cough*Sessions*cough*. I hope that Rand Paul turns out to be more like Coburn... of course its easy to be polite when you don't have much opposition in your district. Given the guy I like most isn't running (not his fault, I wouldn't want to be President)... not sure what I'm going to do. Voting for 4 more years of Obama would not be a bad choice if the GOP is going to re-take the Senate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubbs Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 I'm dead serious when I say that I'll happily put up $500 on PayPal against anyone who thinks that Romney or Palin will be elected. I'd love to make $500 that easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 I thought there were rumblings about that one guy Chris Christie...is that his name? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toe Jam Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Obama will beat any of those candidates handily. Republicans suck and America knows it. The 2010 elections were a blip on the screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar78 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 No. Its just hard to say. Huckabee, Gingrich and their SEC cohorts have a stronger strengh of schedule. While Rick "Big Ten" Santorum is gonna look good in primaries but he'll never show up on election day. Romney and Palin never play anyone good. In short, we need a playoff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACW Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 I thought there were rumblings about that one guy Chris Christie...is that his name?I don't think he's running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/the-line/skipping-iowa.htmlWell, they ranked the Top 10 potential 2012 Republican candidates; agree or disagree. 10. Rick Santorum 9. Jon Huntsman 8. John Thune 7. Mitch Daniels 6. Haley Barbour 5. Tim Pawlenty 4. Mike Huckabee 3. Newt Gingrich 2. Sarah Palin 1. Mitt Romney It's widely believed that Pawlenty, and Romney will run, I've not heard anything about the others. And I pray to God Newt stays out of it. The guy is sometimes clever, but He's a major risk IMO. I like Huckabee, but he better not run again. I think he's damaged pretty badly from 2008. I'm still waiting on Palin to say she's in or not until you says otherwise, I'm keeping my options open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted January 30, 2011 Author Share Posted January 30, 2011 They said that even before he got sick.He has a artificial one added On a more serious note Could you imagine the Dem attacks on Huntsman? Clearly they couldn't go the idiot route so evil capitalist genius would be dragged out. I'd like to see him,Bolton and Newt in the running just to step up the level of debate. Cheney still has his old ticker, they implanted a pump or somewhat thing to help him with his heart. Cheney said himself in a recent interview that he probably will need a new heart. I think it was on Meet the Press. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Facts have a way of interfering with the stupid jokes....roll with me here. Old men are not prime candidates for transplants,nor should we be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deejaydana Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 I would eliminate Palin from that list as well as Romney, they're both failures from the past cycle. I'm not even sure Palin would want the chance, at least I pray she passes on it. Gingrich, while he's very intelligent, may be too divisive though he did a great job collaborating with Clinton back in 1996. I don't know enough about the others to comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan133 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 I'm voting for Thomas Jefferson again if any of those guys make it on the GOP ticket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Any of the 10? Just who do you want? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan133 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Any of the 10?Just who do you want? I think I'd be happy with Coburn or Pence, maybe... That's a big maybe. In my heart of hearts I'd want Ron Paul, but we all know this is incredibly unlikely. My dream candidate doesn't exist: A vibrant, young person who can express most of the libertarian/conservative ideas that Ron Paul espouses without sounding like and coming off as a crazy old man. Ron Paul is simply past his prime, the Liberty movement needs someone younger and more articulate to carry the standard. That person has not been found yet, and therefore until that person shows up, I'll continue to pencil in the name Thomas Jefferson. Actually, I might mix things up a bit and vote for Coolidge in this election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubbs Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 It's widely believed that Pawlenty, and Romney will run, I've not heard anything about the others. And I pray to God Newt stays out of it. The guy is sometimes clever, but He's a major risk IMO. I like Huckabee, but he better not run again. I think he's damaged pretty badly from 2008. I'm still waiting on Palin to say she's in or not until you says otherwise, I'm keeping my options open. How was Huckabee damaged in 2008? He wasn't expected to be a major player, yet managed to turn into one, and a lot of people believe that he's the reason Romney didn't win. I'd actually give him some of the best odds of anyone on the list in the OP. Also, you might want to re-think your hopes for Newt. I don't think he has a shot in hell of actually getting nominated, but if he runs he'll add an interesting voice and some creative ideas to the debates that other candidates will be forced to address. I think I'd be happy with Coburn or Pence, maybe... That's a big maybe. In my heart of hearts I'd want Ron Paul, but we all know this is incredibly unlikely. My dream candidate doesn't exist: A vibrant, young person who can express most of the libertarian/conservative ideas that Ron Paul espouses without sounding like and coming off as a crazy old man. Ron Paul is simply past his prime, the Liberty movement needs someone younger and more articulate to carry the standard. That person has not been found yet, and therefore until that person shows up, I'll continue to pencil in the name Thomas Jefferson. Actually, I might mix things up a bit and vote for Coolidge in this election. Gary Johnson's younger, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrong Direction Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 The problem with the GOP field is nobody stands out but the top four, but none of them are particularly hot candidates. You could add Jindal, Bolton, Guiliani and Bachmann as well. I think Pawlenty and Thune are both risers. A lot of people like Daniels and Barbour as well, but none of the four are known nationally. I guess that's what primaries are for. I'd vote for any of Jindal, Guiliani, Thune, Pawlenty, Newt, Daniels, Barbour and Romney before I ever voted for Obama, so I"m not really pressed. In the end, the real question is whether Christie decides to run. If he does, he's the odds on favorite to win the nomination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron78 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I like Newt Gingrich and Allen West more than any of the other candidates. For different reasons though, I am not confident that either of them is electable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I'd donate to a West run just for the entertainment value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron78 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I'd donate to a West run just for the entertainment value What would be entertaining about it for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Peoples reactions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boston skins fan Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Third, there isn't anyone on that list that I find myself ready to run through a brick wall to support. Pawlenty is probably the closest, but I probably won't get really pumped until the McDonnell 2016 campaign gets underway. I completly agree and it pains me to say this but i think the GOP might not run a great candidate cause i think they want a McDonnell or I think a better candidate Scott Brown in 16. Brown is making moves within the party and is becoming a rising name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fergasun Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 They wouldn't want McConnell or Brown (he'd never make it through the primary). GOP may be angling for Christie in 2016. I know some people who have a political theory that the parties will intentionally throw presidential elections now for the next one. Of course they said that McCain was a "throw the game" candidate in 2008. It seems like the GOP maintains their lead in the House and picks up the Senate... I'd rather have divided government than give one party all 3 branches. I say "one party" as if there were real, meaningful differences between the parties. Okay; there are some but there's enough similarities. One piece of legislation (health care reform) sticks out in my mind as kind've a "moons aligning" event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardi gras skin Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 At this point, I think I like Pawlenty the most. I just read this article over at Real Clear Politics and he comes out sounding like a solid leader: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/01/31/steel_deal_reveals_pawlentys_priorities_on_security_jobs_108711.html But if we get a Republican controlled House and Senate, I would rather Obama stay on as president. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 In somewhat related news http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48533.html Jon M. Huntsman Jr., the U.S. ambassador to China, sent a resignation letter to President Barack Obama on Monday, the White House said. Huntsman now is likely to explore a Republican presidential bid, according to supporters. Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48533.html#ixzz1CiGt561I Huntsman boasts the most foreign policy experience of any of the likely GOP candidates, and would be a formidable entry to the unformed GOP field. He had a fiscally conservative record as governor, opposes abortion and is a strong supporter of gun owners’ rights. The ambassador has moderate views on gay rights and the environment, which would be an asset in a general election but could be a hurdle in the primaries. In a campaign, Huntsman could be expected to point out that he has created jobs in both the private and public sectors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRSmith Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Interesting now with two Mormons in the raise what does the religous right do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Interesting now with two Mormons in the raise what does the religous right do. You seem way to hung up on the fact that some are Mormons. I really doubt that a candidate's religion would have much impact on most voters. Of course, there will always be some who make that an issue, but it's not a huge percentage of the overall voting population It's their principles, historical actions and future plans that most are concerned with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.