Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

NBC: George Lucas Wants to Resuscitate Dead Actors Using Computers


JMS

Recommended Posts

Just when you think you've heard of everything.... You hear something new and unexpected.

George Lucas Wants to Resuscitate Dead Actors Using Computers

From the horrible ideas department comes the news from George Lucas that he's buying "the film rights to dead actors." You know, so he can resurrect them virtually for upcoming movies. Oh, come on, George.

Yes, there may someday be yet another Star Wars reissue, but this time with Alec Guinness referencing Facebook to Luke. You know, so a new generation of kids will be able to "get it!"

Look for actors to start laying out their film rights in their wills to prevent this from happening pretty much ASAP. Because when you're dead, you don't have the power to say no to George Lucas.

The Sun via Gizmodo

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/tech/George-Lucas-Wants-to-Resuscitate-Dead-Actors-Using-Computers-111400864.html?dr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so my big question....assuming you do manage to "ressurect" the dead actor visually....how do you make a new movie using any lines at all? Do you have impersonators (Darrel Hammond, Frank Caliendo, etc.) reading the lines in the actor's voice, or do you go all Matt and Trey in "The Return of Chef" and just splice different lines together and hope it doesn't sound like ****?

Here's an example, even tho Matt and Trey went the "sounds like ****" route on purpose: http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/155183/first-taste-of-new-chef

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been talking about this for so long... ever since re-doing those Fred Astaire bits in the commercials. I think it's a terrible idea as we lose the craft of the actor. Sure, you get that familiar face, but it's often what's going on internally that makes a great actor great. Still, it'll be easy as hell to use computer modeling to make these animated actors say or do anything and look realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[Devil's Advocate]

OTOH, how different is this from the thing I've been seeing in literature for a decade. The trend of

Dead Author's

MOST

FAMOUS

CREATION

by

No-name Ghostwriter

How is that different from TuPac and Biggie coming out with 27 records after they had been dead for half a decade?

_CNs3PR-4ec

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's quite different... as those are reinvisionings of a classic tale or an extrapolation on what happened before or after a popular tale. Adaptation is a valid artform and a good adaptation can provide insight or be reworked to have more meaning to a new generation. See West Side Story versus Romeo and Juliet. Very different, but yet Bernstiens and Sondheims work is just an ode to Shakespeare.

What Lucas is suggesting is just a new form of animation to exploit a popular face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, maybe I misunderstood what you are pointing at. I thought you were talking about the thousandth remake of Sherlock Holmes or Robin Hood or the Wizard of Oz.

That's a different type of exploitation... though I have to admit I have a soft spot for the guy who's taken Robert Jordan's notes and is trying to wrap up his Wheel of Time series.

Mixed feeling on that. On the one hand, it's a little sleazy. On the other, I always kind of liked it when they said, after a Batman movie... based on the character written by Bob Kane. There's a part of me that appreciates the fact that progenitor of those stories continues to get their due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that's what I was referring to.

Famous, successful, rich author dies.

Heirs then take all the notes they can find in his office, all the stories that the old guy had started, and rejected, and sells the notes, the characters, she universe, and the dead author's name, to somebody else, so we can make some cash from the dead guy's name before the value goes down.

(Or at least, that's the way I imagine things.)

The biggest print on the cover of that book, is the name of a person who didn't consent to his name being there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, I should point out that this is an ironic concern coming from a Star Trek fan.... how many Star Trek spinoffs and novels by different authors have capitalized off its branding?

None of them had Gene Roddenberry's name as the largest print on the cover.

And, either

1) He didn't own the rights to Star Trek, because he sold them. Or

2) He consented to, and profited from, the spinoffs.

Edit:

I don't have a problem with somebody, say, Lucas, making a sequel to Casablanca. Find whoever has the rights, pay them a fee, and start writing. (Knowing Lucas, it would probably be Casablanca, Part 1, and it would tell us why Sam isn't allowed to play "As Time Goes By.")

But, putting Bogart in the movie, now that's an attempt by other people, to profit from Bogart's reputation and name, without his consent.

Edit 2, OT:

The themes in this thread: Dead actors, Casablanca, Bogart, Star Trek. Are reminding me of a scene in one of my favorite Trek books, How Much For Just The Planet?.

There's a scene in the book which takes place on a golf course. After the 9th hole, the golf course has a small pub.

A small wooden sign outside the pub displayed images of an elderly, sad-looking human, in some kind of historical costume, and a sculpture of some kind of bird, carved from a black, glass-like, substance.

"The Birdie and the Bogey", the sign read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I pretty much agree. I'm just having fun being difficult.

I do think that as an artist, I deserve both credit and a piece of the pie. That's one of the scariest things about this internet universe we live in. Intellectual property theft is incredibly common and almost no one even has qualms about doing it. How many of us cut and paste copy written materials or images? How many illegally download songs or videos?

So, I hope that the publisher is paying the estate of Roddenberry or Ludlam or even compensating living artists like Stan Lee for the use of their creations. I hope that the artist isn't getting abused and ripped off as usually or so often happens.

I do think though when you see STAR TREK or SUPERMAN that branding links you to a creative mind that deserves honor, credit, and perhaps money. Afterall, if Baum hadn't written about it no one would know that we're not in Kansas anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...