Wow, some GOOD picks for once!

[kleese]

Best picks I've seen thus far..........

2003 NFL PREDICTIONS

AFC East:

New England Patriots 11-5

Buffalo Bills 10-6

Miami Dolphins 9-7

New York Jets 7-9

AFC North:

Baltimore Ravens 9-7

Pittsburgh Steelers 9-7

Cleveland Browns 7-9

Cincinnati Bengals 5-11

AFC South:

Tennessee Titans 11-5

Indianapolis Colts 10-6

Jacksonville Jaguars 6-10

Houston Texans 3-13

AFC West:

Kansas City Chiefs 11-5

San Diego Chargers 9-7

Oakland Raiders 8-8

Denver Broncos 7-9

Division Winners (in order): Patriots, Titans, Chiefs, Ravens

Wild Cards: Colts, Bills

First Round:

Colts over Ravens

Chiefs over Bills

Second Round:

Patriots over Colts

Titans over Chiefs

AFC Championship Game:

Patriots over Titans

NFC East:

New York Giants 10-6

Philadelphia Eagles 10-6

Washington Redskins 8-8

Dallas Cowboys 6-10

NFC North:

Green Bay Packers 10-6

Minnesota Vikings 8-8

Detroit Lions 5-11

Chicago Bears 4-12

NFC South:

Tampa Bay Buccaneers 12-4

Atlanta Falcons 10-6

Carolina Panthers 7-9

New Orleans Saints 5-11

NFC West:

St. Louis Rams 10-6

San Francisco 49ers 9-7

Seattle Seahawks 8-8

Arizona Cardinals 2-14

Division Winners (in order): Bucs, Packers, Giants, Rams

Wild Cards: Eagles, Falcons

First Round:

Giants over Falcons

Eagles over Rams

Second Round:

Bucs over Giants

Packers over Eagles

NFC Championship Game:

Bucs over Packers

Super Bowl XXXVIII: New England Patriots 20, Tampa Bay Buccaneers 17.

This guy is a genius..............

[Potato Sack]

I don't know...

the Bills with a better record than the Fins? I don't think so. The AFC South looks about right, unless for some reason Brunell goes down and the league has to contend with Leftwhich. I like how they've predicted the NFC East. I still feel we have the capability to go 10-6 or 9-7.

Oh...and the Saints? I'm sure they can pull out a better season than that. I'm not too sure about that prediction either.

The poor, poor Cards :rotflmao:

When we start thinking about the negatives of our team, we ought to think about Arizona. I actually feel sorry for them. Ok...manybe not!

[jbooma]

not bad but one question, how is NE going to win without a running game???

[bulldog]

depending upon how long Vick is out I would not just pencil the Falcons into the playoffs just yet. this team has a lot to prove to me that 2002 was not a fluke. Price helps keep the momentum going but I have to see this team out there winning games as a target of other clubs before I am going to annoint them.

[kleese]

Actually, those are MY picks, sorry to mislead

I wanted my picks to be realistic, meaning a total of 256-256. I am happy/confident with my picks, although I do admit 5 wins for the Saints is probably too low. I see them more as a 7-8 win team.

I really like Bllicheck, and although I wonder why they haven't addressed their RB situation, I am a big fan of their revamped defense and a HUGE Tom Brady fan.

The Dolphins? Dave Wandstedt is the defensive version of Norv Turner. I will NEVER pick them to win anything significant as long as he is there and/or proves me wrong. I love the talent on their D though.

I'm down on the Raiders and Broncos this year, but I was really wrong about Oakland last year.

My toughest calls were Baltimore, Buffalo, San Francisco, NY Giants, and yes, the Redskins.

I just could NOT decide on 7-9, 8-8, 9-7, or 10-6. Seeing I couldn't choose 8.5 wins, I went with the easy way out. They'll have to earn any respect this year, even from die-hards like me. I am hopeful though

[Tom [Giants fan]]

So, you are giving the Giants the tiebreaker saying they are going to beat the Eagles twice like a government mule??? :laugh:

[kleese]

Tom-- they may split, but the Giants could then win the next tie-breaker, which is NFC record. Who knows? It's just a gut feeling I have that the Giants will win the East, but it will be as close at the end as possible.