Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Jason Campbell traded to the Bills? Marshall to the Skins? pure speculation.


Deadeye Dunkan

Recommended Posts

Agree, I have always said that I have no problem replacing JC. Just make sure you bring someone in that is better than he is.

Edit: That said, this whole thing doesn't make sense from the standpoint of next season.

What I mean by that is why trade JC? I see the other trades, but not the one with JC. Both Allen and Shanny have stated that they do not want to rebuild. Dumping JC equals rebuilding. And, please having TC and Colt means rebuilding. Also, keeping JC does not mean not drafting a future replacement QB.

Teams are always in some form of rebuild, free agency forces teams into it one way or the other.

How can we not rebuild the O-line?

And if we don't need to rebuild then just how bad is JC?

I am always puzzled by the statement that unless we can find someone better we shouldn't get rid of JC, how can we do worse than JC? And even if we did, how much worse could we possibly be?????????????????

If I am GM, JC is gone to the highest bidder as soon as possible, and if the highest bid is a 6th rd draft pick? Good bye!

As for Moss, and Laundry for Marshall? In a heartbeat I make that trade!

We should be so lucky to pull off this trade scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chad Pennington, please, at least you could have come up with a better name than that. JC is better than Chad. I can't argue JC's record. It is what it is. And, I can't argue that JC has lost since he has been here. But, I bet Shanny wants a QB with a little more arm strength.

At least come up with a QB that has won and doesn't have a noodle arm. Cutler hasn't won either, but I bet you wanted him last year.

I just hope all the take a QB with the fourth pick are right. Because at that spot you need to find franchise QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chad Pennington, please, at least you could have come up with a better name than that. JC is better than Chad. I can't argue JC's record. It is what it is. And, I can't argue that JC has lost since he has been here. But, I bet Shanny wants a QB with a little more arm strength.

At least come up with a QB that has won and doesn't have a noodle arm. Cutler hasn't won either, but I bet you wanted him last year.

I just hope all the take a QB with the fourth pick are right. Because at that spot you need to find franchise QB's.

Atleast you can say that Pennington lead his teams to numerous playoff runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chad Pennington, please, at least you could have come up with a better name than that. JC is better than Chad. I can't argue JC's record. It is what it is. And, I can't argue that JC has lost since he has been here. But, I bet Shanny wants a QB with a little more arm strength.

At least come up with a QB that has won and doesn't have a noodle arm. Cutler hasn't won either, but I bet you wanted him last year.

I just hope all the take a QB with the fourth pick are right. Because at that spot you need to find franchise QB's.

pennington is a much better QB than campbell, regardless of his arm strength. arm strength doesnt mean much if youre not accurate. jamarcus russell has the strongest arm in the NFL, and hes an abomination of a QB.

and id love to ask shanny who he'd prefer, campbell or cutler. what do you think his answer would be? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pennington is a much better QB than campbell, regardless of his arm strength. arm strength doesnt mean much if youre not accurate. jamarcus russell has the strongest arm in the NFL, and hes an abomination of a QB.

and id love to ask shanny who he'd prefer, campbell or cutler. what do you think his answer would be? LOL

Hopefully he'd say niether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry BLC while I agree with the 'move on from the Campbell era' sentiment, the reality is he will be the starting QB week 1 next year. He's the insurance policy - against the Rams taking Bradford, against a Bradford holdout, against complications from his surgery, and to absorb a beating while the OL gels for 6 or 7 games and the playbook sinks into the rooks head. Then it's Sammy's show for the next decade+. Just a little more patience, it'll be worth it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is pretty laughable. :laugh:

Alex Smith being better than Jason Campbell is indeed laughable.

Alex Smith has 43Games 43Interceptions and 37Touchdowns.

Jason Campbell has 52Games 38Interceptions and 55Touchdowns.

If Jason Campbell were slower, had a weaker arm, threw more interceptions, less touchdowns, completed less passes, and averaged less yards per attempt... they'd be even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully he'd say niether.

yeah, im sure thats what he'd say. cmon!

Sorry BLC while I agree with the 'move on from the Campbell era' sentiment, the reality is he will be the starting QB week 1 next year. He's the insurance policy - against the Rams taking Bradford, against a Bradford holdout, against complications from his surgery, and to absorb a beating while the OL gels for 6 or 7 games and the playbook sinks into the rooks head. Then it's Sammy's show for the next decade+. Just a little more patience, it'll be worth it

im still not sure he'll be the day one starter. i really doubt shanny and allen want to start their tenure in DC with a guy that couldnt beat the lions or chiefs last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, im sure thats what he'd say. cmon!

im still not sure he'll be the day one starter. i really doubt shanny and allen want to start their tenure in DC with a guy that couldnt beat the lions or chiefs last year.

What are you going to do if he is the day one starter? I am going on record to say he will be. I don't know who will end the season as the starter, but JC will be the day one starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you going to do if he is the day one starter? I am going on record to say he will be. I don't know who will end the season as the starter, but JC will be the day one starter.

No way he starts the season. Shanahan doesn't want his offense to get rained with boos on opening day. Starting JC ends any honeymoon period the new regime has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because it got lost a couple of pages back.

How does this hypothetical trade makes this team better?

Now, commenting on the current conversation.

I also don't think Campbell has proven he is our future at all. He has proven, in my opinion, that he is a tough, competive average QB when given time to throw, which is why I think as someone else said, he will be brought back until Allen and Shanahan find "their guy" to QB this team into the future. Who that ends up being; don't have clue (which is the way it should be - football people making football decisions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way he starts the season. Shanahan doesn't want his offense to get rained with boos on opening day. Starting JC ends any honeymoon period the new regime has.
What are you going to do if he is the day one starter? I am going on record to say he will be. I don't know who will end the season as the starter, but JC will be the day one starter.

id agree with socal. why would shanny want to start his first game as head coach with a QB that consistently loses?

if hes there starting on day one i wont be taking this team seriously until hes gone. i will have zero expectations and be very disappointed. itll just be more of the same. and i cant wait til the fan club starts the raining "well he needs to learn the system" excuses. i havent heard those since the beginning of 08, itll be a nice welcome change! lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you going to do if he is the day one starter? I am going on record to say he will be. I don't know who will end the season as the starter, but JC will be the day one starter.

and I am going on record saying he won't

BTW we don't have the power to make either happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pennington is a much better QB than campbell, regardless of his arm strength. arm strength doesnt mean much if youre not accurate. jamarcus russell has the strongest arm in the NFL, and hes an abomination of a QB.

and id love to ask shanny who he'd prefer, campbell or cutler. what do you think his answer would be? LOL

Pennington:

SPLIT CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT

2009 51 74 413 68.9 5.58 21 1 2 6 76.0

Career 1631 2469 17804 66.1 7.21 80 102 64 162 90.1

Campbell:

SPLIT CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT

2009 327 507 3618 64.5 7.14 84 20 15 43 86.4

Career 1002 1637 10860 61.2 6.63 84 55 38 109 82.3

Per the stats, I wouldn't say he's "much better". Maybe a little better, but Jason is younger. Getting Pennington is just plain dumb, and a waste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

id agree with socal. why would shanny want to start his first game as head coach with a QB that consistently loses?

if hes there starting on day one i wont be taking this team seriously until hes gone. i will have zero expectations and be very disappointed. itll just be more of the same. and i cant wait til the fan club starts the raining "well he needs to learn the system" excuses. i havent heard those since the beginning of 08, itll be a nice welcome change! lol

I have no problem with a new QB getting tossed into the fire on day one.

That being said, I have reservations starting any rookie QB behind our current Swiss cheese line or a newly revamped unproven O-line. It'd be like racing a new car on rusted warn out chassis and old tires.

Why put our future on the field and ruin him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TK what are the two teams that LANDRY prefers??

I would trade J. Campbell for a second straight up so to get Whitner and a Second is done deal for me.

I don't believe the Randy Moss trade for a second I believe it was Santana and Landry for B. Marshall which again I love.

That would give us Marshall, 41st pick(BUF) and Whitner and all we give up is Moss,Landry, campbell i say do it.

WR/TE's: Marshall, D.Thomas, Kelly, F. Davis & Cooley

Safeties: Whitner, Doughty, Horton

Picks: 4, 37, 41 we draft two starting OL and a top five qb from those picks that means we only have to find 1 maybe 2 starting OL in a very weak OL FA class.

I would be so freaking excited with this kind of off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TK what are the two teams that LANDRY prefers??

I would trade J. Campbell for a second straight up so to get Whitner and a Second is done deal for me.

I don't believe the Randy Moss trade for a second I believe it was Santana and Landry for B. Marshall which again I love.

That would give us Marshall, 41st pick(BUF) and Whitner and all we give up is Moss,Landry, campbell i say do it.

WR/TE's: Marshall, D.Thomas, Kelly, F. Davis & Cooley

Safeties: Whitner, Doughty, Horton

Picks: 4, 37, 41 we draft two starting OL and a top five qb from those picks that means we only have to find 1 maybe 2 starting OL in a very weak OL FA class.

I would be so freaking excited with this kind of off season.

This trade scenario makes much more sense that was posted on page 1.

Is Whitner a true FS because we don't need another SS.

This would almost guarantee we draft a QB in the draft though. Hope we draft and get some immediate upgrades for our O-line though otherwise, I am not real comfortable putting any of our QB back there. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...