Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Giuliani: Terrorists Never Attacked When Bush Protected Us


Sikbug

Recommended Posts

Cant we apply the principles of Hate Crime legislation to this?

The difference is WHY they did it.

Do we really know why they did it?

I think they were both a little bit crazy.

There is plenty of debate about Hasan's motives: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/07/terrorism-tragic-shooting-analysts-divided-fort-hood-massacre/

Muhammed was actually convicted of terrorism, and it's part of why he got a death sentence: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,103335,00.html

Lee Malvo's jailhouse drawings depicted jihad: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,104960,00.html

Maybe it will become more clear at Hasan's trial, but I don't think anyone's motives are all that clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everything have to be the President's fault, every single time. :doh:

If it happens once, maybe it's the CIA, or something like that.

If it happens twice, maybe it is the President's fault.

I agree-

Bush to Tenet "Are you sure Iraq has WMDs"

Tenet- "Dont worry, it's a slam dunk".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty simple, really. Bush and the Republicans destroy terrorism, Obama and the democrats are terrorists. Some people in this country can't tell America from Vietnam. World freedom is our Manifold Density. Our precious bodily fluids are under assault, and San Francisco is the main source. Shoes for industry! Shoes for the dead!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, it's a ridiculous differential, but that's not a terrorist attack.

I dont agree, but that's the line from Rudy et al.

How do you know that? We have no idea who did it. The Beltway Sniper claimed to be a terrorist, as defined by Rudy and other morons, but was ignored in his claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know that? We have no idea who did it. The Beltway Sniper claimed to be a terrorist, as defined by Rudy and other morons, but was ignored in his claims.

Was there any evidence to link Muhammed to terror organizations? Hassan had them, we were just to slow to see them, or too afraid to offend people by questioning them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, this may come as a shock to a lot of people, (including Rudy) but WE are at war. Not Obama, or Bush, or either party.

WE ARE ALL AT WAR whether we like it or not.

And as such WE have an enemy, and HE also has a say in when and where and how HE will attack. And we never ever seem to blame HIM.

But hey. I understand.

It's just so much easier to fight a war while we fight among ourselves over who is better at fighting a war. Obviously infighting and blame is always the better strategy than realizing the common goal and working towards that. After all, what is war other than the opportunity to push ideology and score cheap political points?

Absolutely ****ing moronic behavior. Self-centered in the extreme. Oh, and I might add, behavior endorsed and encouraged by our MUTUAL ENEMY.

~Bang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the CIA and other intelligence agencies aren't letting a few attacks slip through because Obama is :paranoid: black. hmmm, could the MAN be trying to ruin Obama? Some think THEY killed Kennedy. Wouldn't ignoring signs of an up coming attack, and not letting them be known ruin a man's legacy as president?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you.

Someone needs to stand up and call that what it was : a terrorist attack.

How so? It was a US soldier who went ape **** and shot a bunch of people. If he's a terrorist then when a Christian blows up an abortion clinic or hunts down a doctor and murders him/her then thats also terrorism, right??

I agree, call it all what it is. Why pick and choose??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, this may come as a shock to a lot of people, (including Rudy) but WE are at war. Not Obama, or Bush, or either party.

WE ARE ALL AT WAR whether we like it or not.

And as such WE have an enemy, and HE also has a say in when and where and how HE will attack. And we never ever seem to blame HIM.

But hey. I understand.

It's just so much easier to fight a war while we fight among ourselves over who is better at fighting a war. Obviously infighting and blame is always the better strategy than realizing the common goal and working towards that. After all, what is war other than the opportunity to push ideology and score cheap political points?

Absolutely ****ing moronic behavior. Self-centered in the extreme. Oh, and I might add, behavior endorsed and encouraged by our MUTUAL ENEMY.

~Bang

Bang, your coming up with some awfully heavy and original stuff here lately. If you came up with all that and worded it like that, I have to ask, "you smokin' sumtin?" :silly: just kiddin. Some of that should be put in granite.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How so? It was a US soldier who went ape **** and shot a bunch of people.

Really ?

That simple, huh.

He just randomly went on a rampage, cuz he had a bad day at work, cuz there wasn't enough Skittles in the vending machine ?

Nice, how you left out his motive.

Might have something to do with all those emails between him and senior al-quaida members ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How so? It was a US soldier who went ape **** and shot a bunch of people. If he's a terrorist then when a Christian blows up an abortion clinic or hunts down a doctor and murders him/her then thats also terrorism, right??

I agree, call it all what it is. Why pick and choose??

You don't think that "US soldier" had an agenda the whole time that lasted for years? That's why terrorism is hard to defeat. It morfs and changes and adapts to find a way through the cracks. Like a ****rouch.

Nobody runs into an abortion clinic screaming, ALAHHHHHHH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't think that "US soldier" had an agenda the whole time that lasted for years? That's why terrorism is hard to defeat. It morfs and changes and adapts to find a way through the cracks. Like a ****rouch.

Nobody runs into an abortion clinic screaming, ALAHHHHHHH!

No, they usually run into an abortion clinic screaming JESUSSSSSSSSS!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody runs into an abortion clinic screaming, ALAHHHHHHH!

So they don't use the Muslim name for "god" means that they don't believe they are doing "gods" bidding?? :D Classic denial. Christians have been murdering in the name of "god" far longer than the Muslims...:silly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone needs to stand up and call that what it was : a terrorist attack.

I disagree. He acted independently and did not have material support or training from an identified terrorist organization, and so I don't think it's useful to classify it as a terrorist attack.

I wouldn't classify the DC sniper as a terrorist attack either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...