Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Thank You D!


TheDiplomat

Recommended Posts

A) No, this isn't a sarcastic thread at all. Our D, albeit frustrating at times, always comes to play. Thanks to our D, our Offense had to go a total of about 15 yards to score both TD's. 15 YARDS! Without our D the score would have been 20-3.

B) Zorn is a horrible play-caller. HORRIBLE. This isn't on Campbell at all. When you run a stretch play at the goaline, you're an idiot. It takes WAAAAY too long for that play to develop. When you call only one shot downfield the whole game (Thomas), you're an idiot. When you're ultimately in charge of the O's production and you average 12 pts a game vs. some of the worst teams in the league, you're an idiot.

In conclusion, thank you D. JZ you're an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would have been uglier without the 2 turnovers, and that's for damn sure.

I hate how year in and year out you guys have to do your jobs as well as try to help out the offense.

Andre Carter had 2.5 sacks today

Orakpo had a sack

Landry had some solid tackles today

Haynesworth did his job

D Hall has yet another pick in as many games

I hope Fletcher,Mc Intosh and Doughty are alright as well as Daniels and Griffin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A) No, this isn't a sarcastic thread at all. Our D, albeit frustrating at times, always comes to play. Thanks to our D, our Offense had to go a total of about 15 yards to score both TD's. 15 YARDS! Without our D the score would have been 20-3.

B) Zorn is a horrible play-caller. HORRIBLE. This isn't on Campbell at all. When you run a stretch play at the goaline, you're an idiot. It takes WAAAAY too long for that play to develop. When you call only one shot downfield the whole game (Thomas), you're an idiot. When you're ultimately in charge of the O's production and you average 12 pts a game vs. some of the worst teams in the league, you're an idiot.

In conclusion, thank you D. JZ you're an idiot.

Glad to see that there are others who feel like i do....

Watching this offense is like listening to a broken record, no matter how many extra sets of eyes are watching!

They are wasting the efforts of what could be a GREAT....thats right....a GREAT defense

Offense can't sustain long drives at ANY time throughout ANY game!

From Campbell, to 4/5ths of the o-line, to all pass catchers not named Moss or Cooley, to Sellers, to Portis, and the HORRIBLE playcalling, this has to be the WORST collective offensive output ever seen on a Redskins team!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would love to see this defense in the hands of a different coordinator

one that was at least competent enough to play Orakpo on the line

he was completely lost in coverage today. thats on the coordinator for putting him a position to fail

Jerry Gray loved his post game interview.

He is the man for the job as head coach imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter what D. Hall, A. Carter, & J. Gray says, it has got to be frutrating as heck playing behind a terrible offense like this. The Defense did all they could to put the offense in the right position to win and the O still stinks up the joint. I really feel bad for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm ok?

Thanks D and thanks Campbell and thanks rest of the Redskins team for making a **** load of money and not doing SHAT.

Let me go total up all the money I spent in the past 10 years on Skins merchandise and see who comes out the idiot. Unfortunately, me.

Thanks Skins!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This season I'd peg the D as the worse unit; they seemed to have turned the corner last week though and looked stout today.

Giants loss: all on the D

Rams win: a push, both units played OK. O didn't score; D allowed 100 plus rush yards.

Lions: ALL on the D, the lack of rush game didn't help.

Bucs win: O was ugly, D played stout though still didn't do enough to fluster the first time starter

Today: O was putrid, no rush game.

Advance NFL Stats, featured on the NYTimes had our O, with an average D, ranked at 17 and our D, if it had an average O, at 24. Why? Few sacks, few ints, decent amount of penalties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...