ttr77 Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 Washington Redskins Quarterly Report By Spence | October 9, 2009 This is the first quarterly report for the Washington Redskins this year. We will do another quarterly report after 8 games of the regular season and then another after 12 games. Finally, at the end of the season, DC Pro Sports Report will have a yearly report on the Redskins. Each quarterly report will look at every position -- including the coaching staff and the front office -- on the team and grade it on a scale from A through F. We will also give overall grades to the offense and the defense. OFFENSE Quarterbacks: Contrary to popular opinion, Jason Campbell is not having a poor season. His 88.5 passer rating is very respectable and superior to those of more celebrated quarterbacks like Tom Brady and Tony Romo sits to pee. His 65.3 completion percentage is the highest of his career and his 7.8 yards per pass attempt is his highest by a big margin. In most statistical categories, Campbell is playing well. The problem is with the 5 interceptions he's thrown and the lack of points scored by the offense [27th overall in the NFL]. These problems are not all of Campbell's making. The offensive line is a mess, blocking poorly for the run and worse for the pass. The lack of any reliable receivers other than Santana Moss and Chris Cooley is hampering the offense, just as it did last year. Unfortunately, Campbell is feeling the pressure to score and has begun forcing some passes, particularly to receivers that are never open. Campbell needs to stop doing that and go back to taking what the defense gives him, even if it isn't much. GRADE: B- Click link for rest... http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/10/washington-redskins-quarterly-report.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michiskin Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 This is a well-written, consise write up of the Redskins season so far. Whether you are a "hysterical Chicken Little" or a "B&G Glasses-wearing Homer" or just "Keeping it Medium", if you haven't given it a look yet, you should. Hence, I'm going to give it a BUMP. What in this report really resonates the most with you? The thing that got my head nodding the most was: "The team continues to make WR Marko Mitchell, a preseason sensation, inactive on game days. The rap against Mitchell is that he made his mark against backups and less than backups, but at least he made his mark. Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly haven't made their mark against anyone -- starters, backups or scrubs." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 The Skins have played 4 winless teams and will play a fifth this week. Campbell considering his competition is having a dumb slow mentally retarded Im not an NFL QB season. They compare his stats above saying it isnt bad. But compared to other QBs that have faced the same crappy teams, he is clearly under being even comparable to average QBs on worse teams as of record from last year like Hill and Edwards. Lions: D. Brees 26/34 358 10.5 6 1 137.0 B. Favre 23/27 155 5.7 2 0 115.3 J. Campbell 27/41 340 8.3 2 1 97.6 J. Cutler 18/28 141 5.0 2 0 100.4 He still cant get a QB rating over 100. Lost to a team that had lost 19 in a row. Bucs T. Romo sits to pee 16/27 353 13.1 3 0 140.6 T. Edwards 21/31 230 7.4 2 1 97.5 E. Manning 14/24 161 6.7 2 0 106.4 J. Campbell 12/22 170 7.7 2 3 70.5 Three picks against the Bucs? Even TE only tossed one Rams M. Hasselbeck 25/36 279 7.8 3 2 96.9 J. Campbell 23/35 242 6.9 0 0 85.7 A. Rodgers 13/23 269 11.7 2 0 126.9 S. Hill 14/24 152 6.3 2 0 104.9 -everyone throws 2 or 3 TDs: Campbell 0 Clearly JC sucks and his good numbers are just a function of the poor teams he has played. He is clearly deficient compared to other QBs...even average ones when normalized to the teams they played. New QB next year. No one can be worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrifNick21 Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 No one can be worse. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 :doh: Insightful, value-added, and a pov well positioned and defended...:hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drastik Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 The Skins have played 4 winless teams and will play a fifth this week. Campbell considering his competition is having a dumb slow mentally retarded Im not an NFL QB season. They compare his stats above saying it isnt bad. But compared to other QBs that have faced the same crappy teams, he is clearly under being even comparable to average QBs on worse teams as of record from last year like Hill and Edwards.Lions: D. Brees 26/34 358 10.5 6 1 137.0 B. Favre 23/27 155 5.7 2 0 115.3 J. Campbell 27/41 340 8.3 2 1 97.6 J. Cutler 18/28 141 5.0 2 0 100.4 He still cant get a QB rating over 100. Lost to a team that had lost 19 in a row. Bucs T. Romo sits to pee 16/27 353 13.1 3 0 140.6 T. Edwards 21/31 230 7.4 2 1 97.5 E. Manning 14/24 161 6.7 2 0 106.4 J. Campbell 12/22 170 7.7 2 3 70.5 Three picks against the Bucs? Even TE only tossed one Rams M. Hasselbeck 25/36 279 7.8 3 2 96.9 J. Campbell 23/35 242 6.9 0 0 85.7 A. Rodgers 13/23 269 11.7 2 0 126.9 S. Hill 14/24 152 6.3 2 0 104.9 -everyone throws 2 or 3 TDs: Campbell 0 Clearly JC sucks and his good numbers are just a function of the poor teams he has played. He is clearly deficient compared to other QBs...even average ones when normalized to the teams they played. New QB next year. No one can be worse. I noticed you left the Giants game off your analysis. A game in which Campbell played substantially better than any other QB the Giants have faced this year. Tony Romo sits to pee had a 29 QB rating against the Giants.... 29. Matt Cassell also had a bad game with less than 50% completion pct. We all know how well Byron Leftwich did against the Giants. Campbell performed well against this Giants team who has DOMINATED every other QB they have faced, but yet you leave them off your analysis.... sounds like you are being quite bias with your presentation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slateman Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 This is why stats mean nothing. JC has sucked all season. He's gotten lucky with his lack of interceptions (I mean, the Lions looked like the Skins defense, dropping 3 or 4). And that luck finally broke against the Bucs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drastik Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Saying JC has sucked all season is strange.... He's played solid this season. He had a horrible game against Tampa Bay, yes. Other than that game he has been solid. He also lead the team to victory against Tampa Bay, a lot of people forget that. With his arm and his legs. That TD pass to Santana was PERFECT. I also like how JC CORRECTS the errors his makes. In week 1 he didnt step up into the pocket and/or scramble when he needed to. Since that game he has had no problems doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 I noticed you left the Giants game off your analysis.A game in which Campbell played substantially better than any other QB the Giants have faced this year. Tony Romo sits to pee had a 29 QB rating against the Giants.... 29. Matt Cassell also had a bad game with less than 50% completion pct. We all know how well Byron Leftwich did against the Giants. Campbell performed well against this Giants team who has DOMINATED every other QB they have faced, but yet you leave them off your analysis.... sounds like you are being quite bias with your presentation. I had the whole write up answering your qs but ES went down and I lost it. I left out the game because I didnt want to crunch the true numbers. Here is a summary as now I am too lazy to make all the points again 1. through 56 minutes of a 60 minute game, JC was approx 14/20 for 155yds and an int and a lost fumble because he holds the ball too long. The lost fumble which led directly to 7 pts doesnt count in his 56 minute QB rating of 72. 2. JC pushed his rating upto 93 with a 5/6 55 yd effort with a TD in the last 2 minutes of play. Everyone who saw it it was clear the Gints had the game and it was a junk TD. 3. It doesnt matter how he did in the Gints game--JC sucked up the Lions, Rams and TB game-unacceptable. He lost to the Lions who were 0-19. Embarrassing 4. JC sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drastik Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 I disagree. The Giants game was not over until the failed onside kick attempt. The onside kick occurred with 1:30 left on the game clock. PLENTY of time to run a 2 minute drive in hopes of coming back from a 6 point hole. Saying that was garbage time is ridiculous. The score was 23 - 17 not 23 - 3. Against the Rams and Lions JC had good games. Against the Rams he was pretty much flawless save for 2 over throws. Had his receivers been dependable and caught the two TD passes, his rating would easily be over 100 for the Rams game. Against the Lions he had a solid game, he threw a costly interception, but thats going to happen from time to time no matter what QB you have under center. Jason Campbell kept the Redskins in the Lions game no thanks to a defense that gave up several 80+ yard drives and an abandoned running game. Saying JC single handily lost to the Lions during a game in which Washington's defense played the worst it has played in years is pretty bold. Against Tampa Bay, Jason had the worst game of his career. Yet the Redskins still won the football game thanks in large part to a 3rd quarter stretch in which Jason Campbell led the team to three consecutive scoring drives... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 I disagree.The Giants game was not over until the failed onside kick attempt. The onside kick occurred with 1:30 left on the game clock. PLENTY of time to run a 2 minute drive in hopes of coming back from a 6 point hole. Saying that was garbage time is ridiculous. The score was 23 - 17 not 23 - 3. Against the Rams and Lions JC had good games. Against the Rams he was pretty much flawless save for 2 over throws. Had his receivers been dependable and caught the two TD passes, his rating would easily be over 100 for the Rams game. Against the Lions he had a solid game, he threw a costly interception, but thats going to happen from time to time no matter what QB you have under center. Jason Campbell kept the Redskins in the Lions game no thanks to a defense that gave up several 80+ yard drives and an abandoned running game. Saying JC single handily lost to the Lions during a game in which Washington's defense played the worst it has played in years is pretty bold. Against Tampa Bay, Jason had the worst game of his career. Yet the Redskins still won the football game thanks in large part to a 3rd quarter stretch in which Jason Campbell led the team to three consecutive scoring drives... The Gints game was thot to be over by the players and they played soft during the last few minutes and Campbell shocked them. Thge lions game...cmon. He was the only qb to lose to that pathetic team in 20 tries. I didnt say he single handedly lost that game anywhere. QBs are leaders of teams...and he cannot lead our team to victory unlike the other QBs I compared his lousy stats to. And to pine about the dropped passes. All teams have that. All the other qbs have that. Their numbers are still better. What about ints that he threw that defensed dropped. I remember a couple of dropped ints against him as well. I know you like JC and I think he is a dimwitted moron. But it is clear he just doesnt produce even against the worst teams--even the worst team ever in professional football history. Who was the QB of the team that lost to the only team ever to go through an entire NFL season in the history of football without a win. Answer: Jason Campbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLASKINSFAN Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 J. Campbell 27/41 340 8.3 2 1 97.6 He still cant get a QB rating over 100. :hysterical: I'll take that hate all day. Buy nyourself a Manning Jersey and call it a day already ****.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirClintonPortis Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 The Lions aren't the same team anymore. They had a lot of roster turnover. We won't know how bad they really are until the season is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 The Lions aren't the same team anymore. They had a lot of roster turnover. We won't know how bad they really are until the season is over. Are you ****ing kidding me. Here is what the Lions have given up: 48, 45, 27, and 14. Guess which team was the 14? Ok, now the Bucs: 34, 33, 24, 16. Guess who was the 16? Now the Rams: 36, 35, 28, and 9. Guess who was the 9? Every one of those teams (besides the Skins) scored 4-5 TD's on the Rams. We kicked 3 field goals. Dude, wake the **** up. The Lions are who we thought they were. They've lost 3 times by an average score of 40-22. So, in other words, our defense actually held them to less than average but our offense laid down a turd, once again. Our defense has never given up 1/2 of what the Lions opponents average and we still couldn't score 1/2 as much. The Lions will go no better than 3-13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirClintonPortis Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 And the D made a Stafford who was tossing pick after pick look like a pro and gave Kevin Smith and Steven Jackson excellent stat lines. The primary reason the O is stinking it up now is because they can't run it in from the 10 yard line in, something that good teams clearly are able to do with consitency, as 'prolifc' offense with 45+ TDs may have a QB that throws for maybe 20-25 Tds and the running attack and defense account for about another 20, give or take a few. Our D can be relied on to produce a goose-egg in the TD department, so it's the running game, in particular the goal line running game, that needs to pick up the slack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdskn4eva Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 The Skins have played 4 winless teams and will play a fifth this week. Campbell considering his competition is having a dumb slow mentally retarded Im not an NFL QB season. They compare his stats above saying it isnt bad. But compared to other QBs that have faced the same crappy teams, he is clearly under being even comparable to average QBs on worse teams as of record from last year like Hill and Edwards.Lions: D. Brees 26/34 358 10.5 6 1 137.0 B. Favre 23/27 155 5.7 2 0 115.3 J. Campbell 27/41 340 8.3 2 1 97.6 J. Cutler 18/28 141 5.0 2 0 100.4 He still cant get a QB rating over 100. Lost to a team that had lost 19 in a row. Bucs T. Romo sits to pee 16/27 353 13.1 3 0 140.6 T. Edwards 21/31 230 7.4 2 1 97.5 E. Manning 14/24 161 6.7 2 0 106.4 J. Campbell 12/22 170 7.7 2 3 70.5 Three picks against the Bucs? Even TE only tossed one Rams M. Hasselbeck 25/36 279 7.8 3 2 96.9 J. Campbell 23/35 242 6.9 0 0 85.7 A. Rodgers 13/23 269 11.7 2 0 126.9 S. Hill 14/24 152 6.3 2 0 104.9 -everyone throws 2 or 3 TDs: Campbell 0 Clearly JC sucks and his good numbers are just a function of the poor teams he has played. He is clearly deficient compared to other QBs...even average ones when normalized to the teams they played. New QB next year. No one can be worse. WOW, just f'ing WOW. 97 quaterback rating...really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdskn4eva Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 The Gints game was thot to be over by the players and they played soft during the last few minutes and Campbell shocked them. Thge lions game...cmon. He was the only qb to lose to that pathetic team in 20 tries. I didnt say he single handedly lost that game anywhere. QBs are leaders of teams...and he cannot lead our team to victory unlike the other QBs I compared his lousy stats to. And to pine about the dropped passes. All teams have that. All the other qbs have that. Their numbers are still better. What about ints that he threw that defensed dropped. I remember a couple of dropped ints against him as well. I know you like JC and I think he is a dimwitted moron. But it is clear he just doesnt produce even against the worst teams--even the worst team ever in professional football history. Who was the QB of the team that lost to the only team ever to go through an entire NFL season in the history of football without a win. Answer: Jason Campbell. ok? Who was the quarterback that lost to the 1977 Bucs? Archie Manning. Whats your point? And by the way, the 76 bucs were the first team to go an entire season w/o a win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 ok? Who was the quarterback that lost to the 1977 Bucs? Archie Manning. Whats your point?And by the way, the 76 bucs were the first team to go an entire season w/o a win Wow, so maybe JC will have 2 sons who turn out to be winning NFL QB's after he is finished failing here. BTW, Dallas was winless in 1960. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Are you ****ing kidding me. Here is what the Lions have given up: 48, 45, 27, and 14. Guess which team was the 14?Ok, now the Bucs: 34, 33, 24, 16. Guess who was the 16? Now the Rams: 36, 35, 28, and 9. Guess who was the 9? Every one of those teams (besides the Skins) scored 4-5 TD's on the Rams. We kicked 3 field goals. Dude, wake the **** up. The Lions are who we thought they were. They've lost 3 times by an average score of 40-22. So, in other words, our defense actually held them to less than average but our offense laid down a turd, once again. Our defense has never given up 1/2 of what the Lions opponents average and we still couldn't score 1/2 as much. The Lions will go no better than 3-13. game, set, match Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 ok? Who was the quarterback that lost to the 1977 Bucs? Archie Manning. Whats your point?And by the way, the 76 bucs were the first team to go an entire season w/o a win yes youre right...I meant the first team ever to go 0-16 in a season in the history of the nfl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 WOW, just f'ing WOW. 97 quaterback rating...really? compared to the other QBs going against an 0-19 team...97 is bad. Oh and he lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.