Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

ESPN: Clayton: Bills likely not done dealing (Info of Redskins' Interest)

bubba9497

By bubba9497
in The Stadium

Recommended Posts

IceDragon38

IceDragon38

Posted
Posted

While it would be nice to see punt returns actually reach double digits more often, it just wouldn't work out for the Skins. Add yet ANOTHER WR, then what do you do with Rock? You can't cut him because it would hurt RB depth. I suppose we could cut Thrash....but the guy is an incredibly hard worker....hell he was the first WR to actually catch a TD pass last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gorebd82

gorebd82

Posted
Posted
While it would be nice to see punt returns actually reach double digits more often, it just wouldn't work out for the Skins. Add yet ANOTHER WR, then what do you do with Rock? You can't cut him because it would hurt RB depth. I suppose we could cut Thrash....but the guy is an incredibly hard worker....hell he was the first WR to actually catch a TD pass last year.

Cut Rock. Love him to death, but he doesn't add to our RB depth. The writing is on the wall. Bring in two RBs and a returner. The team is looking to upgrade from Rock. I think ideally the team would like Parrish to be the explosive returner and hope one of the young backs can not only beat out Rock, but maybe Betts too.

I think the Skins recognize Rock is very replaceable and Betts is old, not that productive, and overpaid. The CFL guy and Aldridge are here for the chance of finding a better, more explosive option at number two. A backup RB won't get more than about 10 touches in a game. So it is important for your number two to be able to take one of those 10 touches for 50 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monk4theHall81

Monk4theHall81

Posted
Posted
Exactly this guy would fill a huge need at punt returner and kick returner. He is a game breaker. I would have no issue at all picking him up for a 4th or 5th. No need for him at reciever but as a returner he is awesome.

Thank you, at least someone on here knows something about football and not just Colt Brennan and Chris Cooley

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
holmester

holmester

Posted
Posted

According to PFT (i know) Roscoe Parrish is back on the trade block and we are one of the likely landing spots.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/09/21/roscoe-parrish-is-on-the-trade-block-again/

Personally, I think the kid is electric and would be a huge upgrade over ARE on punt returns and a slight upgrade over Rock on kick returns. Not sure what I would offer for him. Have at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
holmester

holmester

Posted
Posted
According to PFT (i know) Roscoe Parrish is back on the trade block and we are one of the likely landing spots.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/09/21/roscoe-parrish-is-on-the-trade-block-again/

Personally, I think the kid is electric and would be a huge upgrade over ARE on punt returns and a slight upgrade over Rock on kick returns. Not sure what I would offer for him. Have at it.

Here is why I bumped.

I maybe should have started a new thread since this is not the same report as the original one that is in the OP. I just didn't feel a PFT rumor was worthy of its own thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...