bubba9497 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=4077830&name=clayton_john Click link for entire article Bills likely not done dealing Friday, April 17, 2009 The trade of Jason Peters doesn't put the Buffalo Bills in the market for a left tackle. Langston Walker will move from right tackle to the left side of the line that Peters is being shipped to Philadelphia. With their first pick (No. 11), the Bills are expected to select a defensive player, most likely a pass-rusher or linebacker, in the upcoming NFL draft. With the No. 28 pick, they can zero in on right tackle candidates. Don't think that the Bills are done with trades. They continue to shop wide receiver Roscoe Parrish, and a natural fit for him would be the Redskins. Ideally, the Bills would like to get a fourth-round pick for Parrish, but the odds favor them receiving a fifth-rounder. Expect something to get done with Parrish either before or during the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travdaskin Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 For a 5th round, that is really low, and why are the Skins the ideal fit??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theivorhick Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Just what we need, another teams garbage receiver... Hell, our WR's had better numbers than he did last year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soup Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 He's shorter than santana moss I think. That would be an odd trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 No thanks I'd rather gamble our 5th rounder on a position of need than trade it for a mediocre-at-best receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighOnHendrix Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 For a 5th round, that is really low, and why are the Skins the ideal fit??? x2 ... I am not an expert on Roscoe Parrish, but he doesn't seem special or tailor-made for our squad to me. Am I missing something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Oh but of course, the Skins are the perfect fit for every cast off, free agent, and player desiring to be traded. ideal because everyone gets paid LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 18, 2009 Author Share Posted April 18, 2009 he's a speedster, and a PUNT RETURNER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighOnHendrix Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 he's a speedster, and a PUNT RETURNER Then we should be trading Randle El for him, not picks. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Parrish can return punts and kicks since El doesn't want to do that anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyndorf25 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 No thanks I'd rather gamble our 5th rounder on a position of need than trade it for a mediocre-at-best receiver. I don't think that the Skins would view him so much as a receiver as they would a kick/punt returner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPortJGibbs89 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 he's a speedster, and a PUNT RETURNERExactly this guy would fill a huge need at punt returner and kick returner. He is a game breaker. I would have no issue at all picking him up for a 4th or 5th. No need for him at reciever but as a returner he is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhyno Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 he's a speedster, and a PUNT RETURNER Depending how the new wedge rule plays out, there certainly is some potential upside to that. It would certainly render rock a little less useful but.. Still, this seems to be completely unsubstantiated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 ESPN Roscoe Parrish http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/players/scouting?playerId=8469 2008 Scouting Report - Scouts Inc. Grade: 66 | Key Alert: None Comment: Parrish is an undersized third-year player with excellent athleticism. He has been used primarily as a No. 3 or No. 4 receiver and return specialist. He has outstanding quickness and burst in space and can be dangerous after the catch. He has turned short, underneath patterns into big plays with elusive moves on the second level. He is quicker than he is fast, but has enough speed to run away from defenders. He has excellent lateral quickness and foot agility to be a solid route runner. Parrish is best in the slot to because he is less apt to be rerouted off the line of scrimmage. He is an instinctive player who can convert routes versus disguising coverages. He can find voids in zone-coverage and understands how to get separation versus man schemes. He is a competitive player, but his lack of size hinders his effectiveness as a blocker. Parrish has good hands to make tough receptions away from his body. He has been an effective punt retuner showing good vision and elusiveness to hit a crease. He doesn't have the overall package to be a starting receiver in the league, but has enough talent to be a solid target and a core special team's contributor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 What bothers me though is that we signed the guy from Canada and he hasn't been given a chance yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dah-Dee Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 If we could get arguably the top punt returner in the league (#1 in yards per return among regular punt returners in both 2007 and 2008), guy who can also return kicks and chip in 20-30 catches a year for a couple of TDs, for a 5th rounder, why wouldn't we jump on that? ARE averaged 6.5 freaking yards per return last year; over the last 2 years Parrish has averaged right about 16 yards per punt return. Wouldn't you guys like to see the Skins starting 10 yards closer to 6 every time the offense comes back out after a punt? Are you willing to give up Dallas Sartz, Robert McCune, Mark Wilson, Andre Lott, Darnerian McCants, or Quincy Sanders to get that? Based on our draft history this decade, odds are that's the kind of player we'd be trading in effect for this 2005 2nd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaSkins27 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Who would you rather have James Thrash or Roscoe Parrish? That's what I thought. The guy is 26 and can burn up field, yea he's 5'9 who cares we desperatly need a punt returner. I am SICK of seeing ARE hop left hop right tackle for 1 yard gain. For a second day pick this year or next year? HELL YES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Jones Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 1. Besides this article, have the skins expressed any interest in this guy. 2. When a team tries to trade a player that doesn't garner a lot of interest any good FO will just wait it out and either pick the guy up for a low second day pick or wait for the release and get him for free. Even Vinny is not stupid enough to waste a 4th round pick on a player we might not even need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 we need help at PR for sure. if he wants to come in and fill that void Im down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Isn't parrish the guy who burned the Skins on that big pass down the field in the game after ST died? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Well that's great. Not only did the trade strengthen a division rival, but it put yet another team that needs a LT ahead of us. If Andre Smith or Oher are there, I'll bet they take him at 11 and keeping Walker on the right. Also I wonder why the Bills didn't push for the 21st pick instead? Peters had a bad year last year (11.5 sacks allowed in 13 starts) but he was good before and he's still young. And I hope we do not trade for Parrish. How would he make our roster? I'd rather just stick with Randle El Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarantula Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 We have no PR, so Parrish makes perfect sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 18, 2009 Author Share Posted April 18, 2009 1. Besides this article, have the skins expressed any interest in this guy. a. it's Clayton, whose one of the more reliable reporters b. the out of nowhere rumors seem to be the ones that happen 2. When a team tries to trade a player that doesn't garner a lot of interest any good FO will just wait it out and either pick the guy up for a low second day pick or wait for the release and get him for free. unless Danny wants him, to insure the Skin's get him Even Vinny is not stupid enough to waste a 4th round pick on a player we might not even need. We don't have a 4th round pick this year, have to be a 5th or lower Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Jones Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 If true Bubba, I just hope Vinny actually does his job right and waits out the Bills. They will come down in price. Correction, sorry about that I meant 5th rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKM311 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Stupid trade IMO! Case in point, look at Jason Peters and what he accomplished and the value Buff got for him. Don't trade unknown potential for someone who has shown his potential and it is not all that great. Will upgrade ST's, but thats about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.