ucfSKINS Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 I searched and did not see this posted. It can be moved to a different thread if deemed necessary. Kinda interesting. Have at it! Why Broncos nixed Redskins, Browns deals http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/97810-why-broncos-nixed-redskins-browns-deals?eref=fromSI In the end, Denver did not want Jason Campbell. And that's why Jay Cutler is headed to Chicago. According to a source involved in the discussions, the Redskins were closing in on a three-way deal Thursday afternoon that involved Cleveland quarterback Brady Quinn going to Denver. The source said he was told that the deal was likely to happen soon. The Examiner reported that a deal was close. Indeed, a CBS affiliate in Denver also reported that Jay Cutler had told them he was told by his agent that he was going to Washington. ESPN also reported that the Redskins were at the top of the list and a deal could happen at any time. However, the deal involving the Browns unraveled, prompting Chicago to jump back in and offer a less-complicated deal, knowing the Broncos liked Bears quarterback Kyle Orton. The source said Denver's preference of quarterbacks was Quinn and then Orton. They were not high on Campbell. So, rather than do a three-way deal with Washington and another team, the Bears, according to an NFL source, called to offer Orton, two first-round draft picks, and a third-round pick in exchange for Cutler and a fifth-round pick. Washington Examiner ...And yes, it was all one paragraph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 I saw this was in "Truth and Rumors"....which one is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntotoro Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Not true. It's all rumors. Everyone is lying. There was never any deal and it was never serious, at least that's what I read here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Not true. It's all rumors. Everyone is lying. There was never any deal and it was never serious, at least that's what I read here. :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsTerps26 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Snyder and Vinny never lie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ucfSKINS Posted April 3, 2009 Author Share Posted April 3, 2009 I saw this was in "Truth and Rumors"....which one is it? was that a rhetorical question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPortJGibbs89 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Not true. It's all rumors. Everyone is lying. There was never any deal and it was never serious, at least that's what I read here.Vinny said the team had no interest in trading for Cutler so its gotta to be a rumor. Will people that believe every word that comes out of Vinnys mouth finialy realize the guy is never going to tell the truth about stuff like this. I dont feel he has to tell the truth either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnb123 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 I would be more worried if Vinny came out and told us what they offered. Then I would know that he must be lying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 There is only one team out of the 32 NFL teams that like Campbell, unfortanetly; the Redskins are that team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnb123 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 There is only one team out of the 32 NFL teams that like Campbell, unfortanetly; the Redskins are that team. What team would that be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 There is only one team out of the 32 NFL teams that like Campbell, unfortanetly; the Redskins are that team. Doesn't the paragraph imply that the Browns wanted him? Or would we have just given all our picks to the Browns in order for them to get rid of Quinn? What team would that be? The consequences of ADD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamshatterer Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 There is only one team out of the 32 NFL teams that like Campbell, unfortanetly; the Redskins are that team. Its unfortunate that you don’t know how to spell unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pocampo Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Re: JLC: Redskins Trying to Land Cutler (Updated) MaCdanials does not want JC he wants somebody he can mold. He has had his eyes on somebody for a long time, and its not JC!!! Has you can see we where talking about this 3 days ago. JC was the reason Cutler is not in DC right now!!! we all knew no one wanted him. I know it sucks for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_89 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 There is only one team out of the 32 NFL teams that like Campbell, unfortanetly; the Redskins are that team. Yet you have a segment of the Redskins fanbase who call others "haters" because we see what the rest of the league sees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSO Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 I've seen this one paragraph a few times already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Its ancient history thats what it is! Time to focus on the Draft ... Sanchez? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 JFriedM ... just read your post ... its hilarious ... 30 thumbs up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky52Mc Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Don't listen to it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky52Mc Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Re: JLC: Redskins Trying to Land Cutler (Updated)MaCdanials does not want JC he wants somebody he can mold. He has had his eyes on somebody for a long time, and its not JC!!! Has you can see we where talking about this 3 days ago. JC was the reason Cutler is not in DC right now!!! we all knew no one wanted him. I know it sucks for us. I guess you could say it sucks for us right now..right. Being a Redskins fan and what you're used to. I could just call you a baby and assume Mommy didn't buy you that shiny toy. But in a sense, I like the idea that not exactly everyone is interested in our franchise QB. If he pans out this year, he'll come cheaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 This makes me very sad. The fact that the Redskins were on TOP of Cutler's list of potential teams makes me wish he was here. In the end, I still have faith in Campbell. Hopefully he can get pissed off enough, and take a **** the world attitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
281skins Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 In the end, Denver did not want Jason Campbell. a three-way deal Thursday afternoon that involved Cleveland quarterback Brady Quinn going to Denver. that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 so Im to believe they wanted Orton over Campbell? if so then the donkeys can get what they deserve...theyre going to be even worse then the chefs and faiders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Why do we respect the opinion of the Broncos? Unless I miss my guess, they just pissed off the Elway Heir they've been desperate for going on ten years now, and are now looking at Kyle Orton as their QB. The picks they got will have to be used in large part to shore up an appalling defense, (29th overall. :pooh:) with the hope they'll improve enough to compensate for the significant downgrade at QB. Last year they're second in the NFL on offense, 3rd overall in passing. And remember, seven RBs went to IR. Does anyone honestly think Orton's getting that kind of production? Consider their defense is SO bad that they HAD to be that kind of offense to just break even at 8-8. They screwed the pooch with Cutler, and have weakened their team considerably. IF they get immediate production out of the defense one would think they'll use these picks on, how good will that D have to get to make the team a contender? There's no reason at all that we should feel embarrassed because the Denver Broncos didn't want our quarterback. Hell, they didn't want THEIR quarterback, and he's one of the most promising players in the league. If anything we should be relieved they don't think much of JC. It's a better omen. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rook Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 Why do we respect the opinion of the Broncos? Unless I miss my guess, they just pissed off the Elway Heir they've been desperate for going on ten years now, and are now looking at Kyle Orton as their QB. The picks they got will have to be used in large part to shore up an appalling defense, (29th overall. P-U) with the hope they'll improve enough to compensate for the significant downgrade at QB. Last year they're second in the NFL on offense, 3rd overall in passing. And remember, seven RBs went to IR. Does anyone honestly think Orton's getting that kind of production? Consider their defense is SO bad that they HAD to be that kind of offense to just break even at 8-8. They screwed the pooch with Cutler, and have weakened their team considerably. IF they get immediate production out of the defense one would think they'll use these picks on, how good will that D have to get to make the team a contender? There's no reason at all that we should feel embarrassed because the Denver Broncos didn't want our quarterback. Hell, they didn't want THEIR quarterback, and he's one of the best one's in the league. If anything we should be relieved they don't think much of JC. It's a better omen. ~Bang Pay attention people - Bang has put it in perspective. The only thing Denver can hope for is that they will have different people picking their draft. Their recent selections have been as stellar as ours. :doh: :helmet: The Rook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 There's no reason at all that we should feel embarrassed because the Denver Broncos didn't want our quarterback. Hell, they didn't want THEIR quarterback, and he's one of the most promising players in the league. If anything we should be relieved they don't think much of JC. It's a better omen. ~Bang classic line :hysterical: I see a new Bang Cartoon coming soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.