bubba9497 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/24/redskins-could-pursue-crowell/ Click link for entire article Redskins could pursue Crowell To replace Marcus Washington at strongside linebacker, the Washington Redskins could pursue Buffalo's Angelo Crowell as a short-term option. In three years as a starter, he posted 119, 82 and 126 tackles but missed last year when he opted to have knee surgery late in the preseason. Even though he would have been out only four to six weeks, the Bills objected to the operation and placed him on injured reserve. A league source said there's "no chance" Crowell will be back in Buffalo. Crowell will turn 28 in August. If the Redskins sign him, that would allow them to address their offensive and defensive line issues with the No. 13 pick. "Ugh" and "Seriously?" were the responses of those at the combine when told the Redskins might bring Jason Taylor back. It makes no sense fiscally or performancewise. He made 37 tackles (according to the NFL) in 526 snaps (according to The Washington Times). Taylor said late in the season, "This dog can still hunt." But what he wouldn't admit is that the hunting conditions weren't optimum. If Taylor is back, it's up to coordinator Greg Blache to create situations in which Taylor can be productive. They started moving him around the field late in the season - on the same side as Andre Carter and in a two-point stance over a guard - to increase his production. "There wasn't ever enough time for him to feel comfortable," coach Jim Zorn said. In addition to having high expectations for receivers Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly, Zorn plans to use tight end Fred Davis dramatically more this year. He played only 111 of 1,026 offensive plays as a rookie. "We're glad we [drafted Davis]," Zorn said. "He's a tremendous athlete. He's going to help this football team. ... It was an excellent pick." Zorn said the Redskins' sack (24) and interception (13) totals will improve but defended the lack of pressure on first and second downs by pointing out the defense was eighth against the run. "We had good athletes and our scheme was very run-limiting," he said. "It's not cautious, but it's disciplined. ... We would all like a much stronger pass rush on third down, and we're working on improving that. We're not satisfied with the lack of sacks and the lack of interceptions. We're going to get better in those two areas." Texas defensive end/linebacker Brian Orakpo injured his hamstring during Monday's workout after he was fourth in the 40-yard dash (4.70 seconds), second in the vertical jump (39.5 inches) and seventh in bench press (31) among linemen. Count on the Redskins attending the Longhorns' pro day in Austin on March 25, regardless of whether they have addressed the strongside linebacker opening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mountain Mama Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 They must be putting up smoke screens left and right because everything I have heard is contradicting itself. They say they want Canty and they will move Taylor to strongside linebacker on 1st and 2nd down. Then they are looking at Crowell for a short term SLB but where does that leave JT on 1st and 2nd down. And finally they are all over Orakpo who is gonna play DE/SLB but hes not gonna be able to fit the run stuffing DE we need and are we really gonna spend a 1st rd pick on a player that has never played the position we are planning on using him at? I would like our SLB depth though with Crowell, J. Taylor and Orakpo. I say sign Canty, sign Crowell, cut JT and try to trade back in the draft. God I can't wait til free agency so I can atleast get an idea of what were doing this offseason and with the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheREALJBird Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 He'd be a good option at SLB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhearn Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 honestly why say you are getting rid of taylor when you arent sure if you are gonna need him or not..we may get screwed in the end and have to use him because we couldnt get anyone in FA to fill a LB or DE spot..and same with draft..if everything works out and we do fill those holes im sure taylor will be gone before training camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaRonDontLikeUgly Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Crowell was not the best athlete before his two major injuries (triceps and knee) but I think he has exceeded most people's expectations when given a starting role. Although he played on the outside in BUF, Crowell came into the draft as an ILB. With his shorter build and 4.7 speed (before injury), he'd probably be better in the middle... but at least he is a guy who can play more than one position. Bring him in. He might be Erasmus James 2.0, or he might come in and surprise people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 not against this move and the redskins still believe they have a shot at Orpako. he is going top ten or 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Bring in Crowell & Canty and bring back Jason Taylor and we can spend our first few picks on the offensive line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IbleedBnG83 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 OMG...its as if the FO is listening to me!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 "Ugh" and "Seriously?" were the responses of those at the combine when told the Redskins might bring Jason Taylor back. It makes no sense fiscally or performancewise.It surprises me that they have not become hardened to odd moves of Vinny and Danny, just as we almost shrug when Al Davis does something crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWFLSkins Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Hold up, we need to get after the QB on third downs, Jason Taylor can do that and most here want to trade, cut or behead him. HE WAS INJURED LAST YEAR. Give the guy a break and see what he can do. He should re-structure and be the thrid down specialist for the rest of his NFL career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 If the Redskins sign him, that would allow them to address their offensive and defensive line issues with the No. 13 pick. Wait, are they getting some amazing two-way player I've never heard about? How can they address both offensive and defensive needs with one pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twenty-eight Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 YES!!! I would be THRILLED if we signed crowell :jump: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maskedsuperstar Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Hold up, we need to get after the QB on third downs, Jason Taylor can do that and most here want to trade, cut or behead him. HE WAS INJURED LAST YEAR. Give the guy a break and see what he can do. He should re-structure and be the thrid down specialist for the rest of his NFL career. :applause::applause: Agreed. I'm tired of the Jason Taylor bashing. The man had a life threatening injury, non football related. And before that, he got hurt in preseason, and was never 100%. So, I can't see how some of you can bash the man. Lets see what happens. I'm sure he will make an impact, next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpheusmeyers Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Hold up, we need to get after the QB on third downs, Jason Taylor can do that and most here want to trade, cut or behead him. HE WAS INJURED LAST YEAR. Give the guy a break and see what he can do. He should re-structure and be the thrid down specialist for the rest of his NFL career. A healthy Taylor can still help the D. Don't think he's worth $8 million at this point in his career, but I've got no issue with him coming back for one more season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dieselfan44 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 All I can say is get ready for the drama because there will be plenty of it beginning Friday at midnight... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Truth Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 I like the idea of getting Crowell AND mainman from Texas; put him on the opposite side of Jason Taylor (if he come's back - GOTTA take a major pay cut tho) & we can have something nice..so what we don't got the BIG run stopper in the middle (hopefully we can get Canty too) - we'll be aiight..beef up that OL in the draft and maybe try to find a "run stopper" in the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moondog Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 They must be putting up smoke screens left and right because everything I have heard is contradicting itself. They say they want Canty and they will move Taylor to strongside linebacker on 1st and 2nd down. Then they are looking at Crowell for a short term SLB but where does that leave JT on 1st and 2nd down. And finally they are all over Orakpo who is gonna play DE/SLB but hes not gonna be able to fit the run stuffing DE we need and are we really gonna spend a 1st rd pick on a player that has never played the position we are planning on using him at? I know, it's almost as if these reporters are just scouring ES and saying the 'skins are targeting the exact players ES has said we should go after. Either that or maybe the FO is interested in stockpiling or front seven defense much like the Giants did recently so much so that they had to make Kiwanuka play linebacker. I wouldn't be opposed but if we bring in Canty and Crowell and keep Taylor we'd better be addressing the offensive line in the draft. I'd rather bring in Canty and maybe a short-term o-lineman in FA and draft Maualuga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Truth Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 I wouldn't be opposed but if we bring in Canty and Crowell and keep Taylor we'd better be addressing the offensive line in the draft. Let the church say AMEN :notworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie5 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 I say sign Canty, sign Crowell, cut JT and try to trade back in the draft. God I can't wait til free agency so I can atleast get an idea of what were doing this offseason and with the draft. That would work for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 :applause::applause:Agreed. I'm tired of the Jason Taylor bashing. The man had a life threatening injury, non football related. And before that, he got hurt in preseason, and was never 100%. So, I can't see how some of you can bash the man. Lets see what happens. I'm sure he will make an impact, next season. its not so much about bashing Taylor, its more along the lines of bashing the front office for bringing him back at his current salary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 They must be putting up smoke screens left and right because everything I have heard is contradicting itself. They say they want Canty and they will move Taylor to strongside linebacker on 1st and 2nd down. Then they are looking at Crowell for a short term SLB but where does that leave JT on 1st and 2nd down. And finally they are all over Orakpo who is gonna play DE/SLB but hes not gonna be able to fit the run stuffing DE we need and are we really gonna spend a 1st rd pick on a player that has never played the position we are planning on using him at? I would like our SLB depth though with Crowell, J. Taylor and Orakpo. I say sign Canty, sign Crowell, cut JT and try to trade back in the draft. God I can't wait til free agency so I can atleast get an idea of what were doing this offseason and with the draft. It very well may be smokescreens...what havent they talked about then would be the logical question. They talked LB, DL, LB but not OT. Keep an eye on the discourse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDSKINZ-RIDEORDIE Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Hold up, we need to get after the QB on third downs, Jason Taylor can do that and most here want to trade, cut or behead him. HE WAS INJURED LAST YEAR. Give the guy a break and see what he can do. THANK YOU :applause::applause::applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 "Ugh" and "Seriously?" were the responses of those at the combine when told the Redskins might bring Jason Taylor back. "those at the combine"?...Who exactly are "those"? His friends? lol...Skins fans? Skins' assitants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 By the way... Redskins could pursue Crowell "Could" pursue Crowell? So is this based off of anything he's been told, leaked or overheard?...Or is it just the writer's version of the ES "vet min + incentives" threads? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moondog Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 By the way..."Could" pursue Crowell? So is this based off of anything he's been told, leaked or overheard?...Or is it just the writer's version of the ES "vet min + incentives" threads? lol My thoughts exactly...see earlier post at top of page...I swear they know we don't like their writings so they visit ES to see what the fans done then write an article saying we "could" pursue the people they know the fans want so we'll be pleased...:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.