Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Is DeAngelo Hall our 3rd CB now?


GOSKINS_08

Recommended Posts

I think I saw Smoot get burnt on a few plays. Gave up some key passes I think. I could be wrong though. Not a huge deal, we all know everyone gives up passes, but I think D. Hall might be our best option at the #3 spot. I think our secondary is rather grand with Landry, Horton, and the four beasts at Corner. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's Post also said that they were rotating everyone in and out to keep them fresh. That' a pretty cool luxury.

That is a very nice luxury. I hope the team decides to keep Springs on board for another couple of seasons so we can retain that luxury. When he's in the game he makes plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope the team decides to keep Springs on board for another couple of seasons so we can retain that luxury. When he's in the game he makes plays.

Not at his current pay rate, He is getting older and has always been fragile. He is a play maker and great guy on and off the field. The facts are we need some real influx of youth with talent in the DL, OL and LB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at his current pay rate, He is getting older and has always been fragile. He is a play maker and great guy on and off the field. The facts are we need some real influx of youth with talent in the DL, OL and LB's.

I agree about adding youth to the lines and LB. But if they can continue to work their salary-cap magic and keep Springs around I really wouldn't mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a very nice luxury. I hope the team decides to keep Springs on board for another couple of seasons so we can retain that luxury. When he's in the game he makes plays.

It would be nice if we could add a few years to his contract without adding any significant amounts of money. I've been one of Springs' biggest defenders but it's difficult to watch 9 million sit on the bench for the majority of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys I believe they had less than 100 yards of passing. this is seattle we are talking about with Matt at QB. Granted they are not what they used to be but still that is VERY impressive.

Ok, but it's not like Hassleback was even close to 100% nor were the receivers.

My dream is to see our Defense generate a sack without bringing LB's or DB's on the blitz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we face teams that like to spread you out and create space, it's nice to know we can put our Dime out there and have four high-level corners on the field.

We blitzed a lot yesterday because we felt confident playing man-to-man on all their wr's.

The Seahawks had a handful of nice pass executions, but there was very little separation out there (except the touchdown to their TE.....i want to know who got roasted on that one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...