dfitzo53 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Threads are cropping up already evaulating Zorn's performance and speculating on the 2009 draft, so I figure we may as well consider all of the offseason possibilities. A number of individuals have already been discussed in the free agent market as well, but I want to get your opinion on a possible trade. We all know that the Redskins could use a couple more draft picks this year, so why not trade away one of our older quarterbacks to get some picks to spend on younger talent along the offensive and defensive line? With the resurgence of veteran quarterbacks like Kurt Warner, Brett Favre, Kerry Collins and Jeff Garcia, there are teams out there who would love to improve their signal callers. Teams like Detroit, San Francisco, Arizona and Minnesota are all looking for answers. So what do you think? I bet Zorn still has some left in the tank, and the hair cut alone is worth a late 3rd or early 4th round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Meh, oh and Meh again. It's in a dictionary now of some sort I saw it. Even in jest, meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21Knock_U_Out Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 ^^^^^^ What he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warpath11 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 no way anyone will trade anything more than a 6th for Todd Collins at this point. I assume you mean Todd Collins since he is the only older QB on our roster. Again no way anyone trades a 3rd or 4th for a career backup that is over 35 years of age. Maybe on Madden though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted November 22, 2008 Author Share Posted November 22, 2008 no way anyone will trade anything more than a 6th for Todd Collins at this point. I assume you mean Todd Collins since he is the only older QB on our roster. Again no way anyone trades a 3rd or 4th for a career backup that is over 35 years of age. Maybe on Madden though? No, it was a joke, I was referring to Zorn. Apparently it wasn't very funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ST is my boy Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 No, it was a joke, I was referring to Zorn. Apparently it wasn't very funny.\Haha...now its funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sideshow24 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Its late. We are bored. We are drunk(the lucky ones). We have NO PRO FOOTBALL to watch. You took a shot at being funny. No worries. PS- I didn't think you could have that many posts by age 23! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkRascadizzle Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 lol I thought that was a typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praise_gibbs Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 PS- I didn't think you could have that many posts by age 23! :paranoid: And I thought this thread was funny Dave! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Colt Brennan for 2 1st rounders........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shilsu Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 How many teams would be willing to trade a pick to make it worth it? Only the Redskins are stupid enough to trade picks for quarterbacks over 30 that they intend to use for the short term. Mark Brunell for a #3 and Brad Johnson for a #1, #2, #3. Well, the Jets, too, but their front office is on par with the Redskins. Tight end, tight end (sound familiar - Fred Davis), letting Kendall go only to have to fill the guard spot with an old ass high-priced FA, trading Moss for Coles, and so on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 May as well change the title now to add "Joke Thread" before the mods do it for you Nice effort, though Can't fault you for trying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zCommander Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Meh, oh and Meh again. It's in a dictionary now of some sort I saw it. Even in jest, meh. Meh is used to describe any and every word possible, including: Yes No maybe kind of never always ok alright no thankyou yes please look ***** i really dont care so just shut the **** up if you want whatever If you wnat i dont want to really well shut up i dont really care no honestly, i dont care... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
techboy Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 The title should be changed to "Interesting Reading Comprehension Test". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texasthunder Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 I think its a great idea. Call the 49'rs and see if we can get Singletary. Afterall we need a linebacker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted November 22, 2008 Author Share Posted November 22, 2008 The title should be changed to "Interesting Reading Comprehension Test". As far as adding joke thread, the mods can do so if they want. They haven't already, so I'm guessing they're not going to. I've never understood the whole "joke thread" title. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of what's inside? Granted, this thread seems to have basically failed at its intended purpose anyway. Maybe it's time for bunnies and pancakes. I think its a great idea. Call the 49'rs and see if we can get Singletary.Afterall we need a linebacker. Actually, that isn't a bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 As far as adding joke thread, the mods can do so if they want. They haven't already, so I'm guessing they're not going to. I've never understood the whole "joke thread" title. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of what's inside? Granted, this thread seems to have basically failed at its intended purpose anyway. Maybe it's time for bunnies and pancakes. Valid points! I don't think it failed, by the way I actually thought it was semi-funny. Just not side splitting funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tennessee Ed Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 ... Granted, this thread seems to have basically failed at its intended purpose anyway. Maybe it's time for bunnies and pancakes. Actually, that isn't a bad idea. I love the bunnies!:point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.